Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kantonsspital Aarau | OTHER |
| Kantonsspital Liestal | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patient case presentations during ward rounds can take place at the bedside or outside the room. The best approach to patient case presentation is yet unclear. Thus, the overall aim of this multicenter, randomized-controlled study is to test the hypothesis that outside the room patient case presentation compared to bedside patient case presentation results in better outcomes across different dimensions including patient understanding and perception of quality of care as well as patient outcomes, physicians' preferences, perception of quality and effectiveness, and timing of the ward rounds, respectively.
Patient-centered care may be defined as "providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions". Involving patients in all steps of the healthcare process is thus important. Yet, best presentation of patients' cases during ward rounds remains unknown. During outside the room patient case presentation, the medical team discusses difficult patient or medical issues in the team, and later presents a "patient-friendly" synthesis to the patient. Bedside patient case presentation, on the other hand, allows a patient to be part of the whole team discussion. Yet, there is concern that patients may be unable to cope with the magnitude of medical information and misunderstandings may occur. Currently, there is equipoise regarding both possibilities of patient case presentation with an important lack of trial data. We thus aim to compare the effect of bedside patient case presentation with outside the room patient case presentation during ward rounds ("Chefarztvisite") on different patient- and physician-related endpoints.
Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to test the hypothesis that outside the room patient case presentation compared to bedside patient case presentation results in better outcomes across different dimensions including patient understanding and perception of quality of care as well as patient outcomes, physicians' preferences, perception of quality and effectiveness, and timing of the ward rounds, respectively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patient case presentation Bedside | Active Comparator | In the bedside presentation group, patient case presentation and discussions will be at bedside with direct involvement of the patient as needed. |
|
| patient case presentation Outside-the-room | Active Comparator | In the outside the room condition, case presentation and discussions will take place outside without the patient being present. After the case presentation and discussions the team will enter the room and give the patient a short summary of the medical situation, complete the medical information and examine the patient, as needed, and discuss the next steps. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| patient case presentation bedside | Procedure | Patient case presentation in absence or presence of Patient at bedside. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective understanding of disease and management | average of the visual analog scale (VAS) score across the following three dimensions rated by the patient (0 "I have no knowledge at all about the situation" to 100 "I have best possible knowledge about the situation": I. Patients' subjective understanding of the disease II. Patients' subjective understanding of the therapeutic concept III. Patients' subjective understanding of the next steps | post ward round up to 36 h |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement understanding | Patients' perception about how well the current ward round improved the understanding of each of these three components, i.e., current disease, therapeutic concept, and next steps (VAS, 0-100) | post ward round up to 36 h |
| Objective understanding of disease and management |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sabina Hunziker, Prof. | Medical Communication, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, and University of Basel, Switzerland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | 4056 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9099660 | Background | Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen MC, Roter D, Dobs AS. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1150-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361606. | |
| 16751910 | Background | Chauke HL, Pattinson RC. Ward rounds -- bedside or conference room? S Afr Med J. 2006 May;96(5):398-400. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003142 | Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
On the day before the ward round, patients will be randomized 1:1 into one of both study arms. In one study arm, patient case presentation will be performed at bedside. In the other study arm, patient case presentation will be performed outside the room.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| patient case presentation Outside-the-room | Procedure | Patient case presentation Outside-the-room. |
|
Comparison of patients' recall information regarding current main diagnosis, main therapeutic measures and next steps (qualitative information) with medical chart information. Answers regarding current main diagnosis will be categorized as: (1) patient correctly states both pathophysiology and localization, (2) patient correctly states either pathophysiology or localization, (3) patient states neither pathophysiology nor localization (correctly) but correctly states symptoms, (4) patient correctly states that the current diagnosis is still unclear, (5) patient states incorrect information, (6) patient correctly states a secondary diagnosis relevant for the current hospitalization Answers regarding main therapeutic measures and next steps will be categorized as: (1) correct (regarding main diagnosis), (2) incorrect (regarding main diagnosis), (3) correct (regarding secondary diagnosis), (4) incorrect (regarding secondary diagnosis) |
| post ward round up to 36 h |
| Overall quality of care | Patients' perception (each rated on a VAS 0-100) regarding: comprehensibility of information during ward round, satisfaction with care, confidence in the medical team, perceived competence of the medical team, perceived interpersonal behavior during ward round, affective response of the patients, adequacy of ward round duration (includes two additional questions asking for patients' estimations on how much time the medical team spent on their case within the ward round as well as on average per day (estimates in minutes)) | post ward round up to 36 h |
| Follow up health status | Patients' perceived health status (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire) | 30 days follow up after study inclusion |
| Follow up understanding | Patients' subjective (VAS 0-100) and objective (recall as compared to objective medical chart information) understanding | 30 days follow up after study inclusion |
| Follow up quality of hospital care | Patients' overall perspective of hospital care (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, HCAHPS) | 30 days follow up after study inclusion |
| Follow up readmission | Patients' readmission rate since study inclusion | 30 days follow up after study inclusion |
| Follow up duration of hospitalization | total duration of hospitalization | 30 days follow up after study inclusion |
| Treating team satisfaction | The treating team's satisfaction with ward round (rated on a VAS 0-100) | post ward round up to 96 h |
| Treating team performance | The treating team's perceived performance in the ward round (each rated on a VAS 0-100): time management of the ward round, interaction within the medical team and with the patient during ward round, perceived time management and feasibility | post ward round up to 96 h |
| Treating team affect | The treating team's affective response (rated on a VAS 0-100) | post ward round up to 96 h |
| Treating team preference | The treating team's preference of bedside compared to outside the room patient case presentation (rated on a semantic differential ranging from 1 "I prefer bedside ward rounds" to 6 "I prefer ward rounds outside the room") | post ward round up to 96 h |
| Timeliness | duration of the ward round (minutes) | during ward round which may last from 5 up to 30 minutes |
| Communication-specific items during ward rounds | Rated by investigator (nominal 3-point scale (1 = yes; 2 = no; 3 = not applicable): structuring of conversation, use of patient-centered techniques, use of physician-centered techniques, dealing with emotions, conveying of complex information, negotiation of shared concepts of disease and treatment, realization of shared decision making, breaking bad news | during ward round which may last from 5 up to 30 minutes |
| 26628552 | Background | O'Leary KJ, Killarney A, Hansen LO, Jones S, Malladi M, Marks K, M Shah H. Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients' decision control, activation and satisfaction with care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):921-928. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561. Epub 2015 Dec 1. |
| 26840968 | Background | Ramirez J, Singh J, Williams AA. Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds. South Med J. 2016 Feb;109(2):112-5. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000419. |
| 10760128 | Background | Seo M, Tamura K, Morioka E, Shijo H. Impact of medical round on patients' and residents' perceptions at a university hospital in Japan. Med Educ. 2000 May;34(5):409-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00516.x. No abstract available. |
| 37734895 | Derived | Gross S, Becker C, Beck K, Memma V, Gaab J, Schutz P, Leuppi JD, Schaefert R, Langewitz W, Trendelenburg M, Breidthardt T, Eckstein J, Osthoff M, Bassetti S, Hunziker S. Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073584. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073584. |
| 36085211 | Derived | Becker C, Gross S, Gamp M, Beck K, Amacher SA, Mueller J, Bohren C, Blatter R, Schaefert R, Schuetz P, Leuppi J, Bassetti S, Hunziker S. Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1180-1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9. |
| 35072414 | Derived | Gross S, Beck K, Becker C, Gamp M, Mueller J, Loretz N, Amacher SA, Bohren C, Gaab J, Schuetz P, Mueller B, Fux CA, Leuppi JD, Schaefert R, Langewitz W, Trendelenburg M, Breidthardt T, Eckstein J, Osthoff M, Bassetti S, Hunziker S. Perception of physicians and nursing staff members regarding outside versus bedside ward rounds: ancillary analysis of the randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jan 19;152:w30112. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30112. eCollection 2022 Jan 17. |
| 34181449 | Derived | Becker C, Gamp M, Schuetz P, Beck K, Vincent A, Hochstrasser S, Metzger K, Widmer M, Thommen E, Mueller B, Fux CA, Leuppi JD, Schaefert R, Langewitz W, Trendelenburg M, Breidthardt T, Eckstein J, Osthoff M, Bassetti S, Hunziker S; BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Study Group. Effect of Bedside Compared With Outside the Room Patient Case Presentation on Patients' Knowledge About Their Medical Care : A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1282-1292. doi: 10.7326/M21-0909. Epub 2021 Jun 29. |