Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Triste | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to analyze neoformed bone after maxillary sinus lifting with transcrestal approach, in atrophic crests (≤5 mm residual bone height). Clinical and laboratory data will be related to maxillo breast anatomy.
Bone resorption and sinus pneumatization, following tooth extraction, are common occurrences in the posterior maxilla. They may cause both a quantitative reduction and qualitative deterioration of bone, resulting in an inadequate bone volume for a standard implant placement. Sinus floor elevation with lateral approach had been described 35 years ago and widely studied afterwards, demonstrating an high predictability in regenerating bone, to allow for reliable implant supported rehabilitations. Maxillary sinus floor elevation with transcrestal approach represents a validated and effective alternative option to vertically enhance the available bone through an access created in the edentulous bone crest. Regardless of graft type, it is not yet well defined how three-dimensional anatomical sinus cavity characteristics may influence healing and mineralization process. An adequate Schneiderian membrane elevation in order to expose sinus floor, buccal and medial walls, seems to represent a crucial factor in influencing new bone formation, as the greatest part of the osteoprogenitor cells derives from these anatomical structures. It is not documented yet the efficacy of the different trnanscrestal sinus floor elevation approaches in exposing the internal bony walls of the sinus. Moreover, on the basis of the fact that only few articles correlated the size of the maxillary sinus with histologic outcome by lateral window and one retrospective radiographic study reported results in relation to the three-dimensional conformation of the sinus using a trans-crestal approach, the investigators conjecture that sinus bucco-palatal diameter could influence the newly-formed bone quality after a crestal sinus lift procedure. For example, the healing in a narrow maxillary sinus could result in a faster new bone formation, when compared to a larger and wider sinus. The aim of this study is to analyze neoformed bone after maxillary sinus lifting with transcrestal approach, in atrophic crests (≤5 mm residual bone height). Clinical and laboratory data will be related to maxillo breast anatomy. The present study has been designed as a multicenter prospective clinical trial. Five clinical centers will treat patients with two-stage transcrestal sinus floor elevation using a calibrated drills technique and a xenogeneic biomaterial. Implants will be inserted 6 months after sinus augmentation and bone-core biopsies will be harvested during the implant site preparation. Histological analyses will be performed in order to assess the quality of the newly-formed tissue and cone beam computed tomography scan examination will be used to evaluate graft resorption over time. For each inserted implant, collection of experimental parameters will be required up to 1 year after its placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| narrow sinuses | transcrestal sinus floor elevation in narrow sinuses |
| |
| wide sinuses | transcrestal sinus floor elevation in wide sinuses |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transcrestal sinus floor elevation | Procedure | augmentation procedure with xenograft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| newly formed bone | assessment of newly formed bone via histomorphometric analysis | 6 months after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| implant success | short term implant success rate via clinical and radiographic data | 1 years after implant insertion |
| exposed walls | number of sinuses exposed walls after augmentation procedure via cone beam computed tomography |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Local inclusion criteria will be the following:
General exclusion criteria are:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population was composed of all patients presenting for evaluation and management of any partial edentulism requiring unilateral maxillary sinus elevation. To be included in the study sample, patients had to present a residual crestal height on the sinus floor less than 5 mm, to be 18 years or older, and able to understand and sign a written informed consent form.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Claudio Stacchi, Dr. | Piezosurgery Academy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piezosurgery Academy | Parma | 43100 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21320169 | Background | Farina R, Pramstraller M, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L. Alveolar ridge dimensions in maxillary posterior sextants: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1138-1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02087.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15. | |
| 20467595 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000099066 | Atrophic Maxilla |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D008439 | Maxillary Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
bone biopsies were retrieved at the time of implant placement (after 6 months of regenerative procedure) and obtained through implant site preparation with trephine bur
| 10 day after surgery |
| Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, Worthington H, Coulthard P. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26. |
| 20450402 | Background | Avila G, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P, Misch CE, Bagramian RA, Rudek I, Benavides E, Moreno-Riestra I, Braun T, Neiva R. The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes. J Periodontol. 2010 Jul;81(7):1041-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090686. |
| 28125520 | Result | Lombardi T, Stacchi C, Berton F, Traini T, Torelli L, Di Lenarda R. Influence of Maxillary Sinus Width on New Bone Formation After Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Proof-of-Concept Prospective Cohort Study. Implant Dent. 2017 Apr;26(2):209-216. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000554. |
| D007571 |
| Jaw Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |