Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Meditrial Europe Ltd. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pre-market Investigational device exemption study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Surfacer System to facilitate stable upper body central venous access suitable for any conventional catheter.
This prospective, single arm, multi-center study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Surfacer System. Safety will be evaluated based on the overall rate of acute complications using the study device as compared to historical rates of device/procedure related safety events using conventional central venous access methods. Efficacy will be evaluated by the rate of transient successful central venous accesses created by the study device. A total of 30 patients are planned to be enrolled, with 10 patients initially following review of safety data. Duration expected to be through 7 days. A minimum of 3 sites will participate in the study in the United States.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Venous Access Placement | Other | Central venous access placement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Venous Access Placement | Device | Device inserted into the femoral vein to insert a central venous access catheter |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Safe Insertion and Patency of Central Venous Access Catheter | Safety reported as 86.7% (26/30) % of subjects with no procedural complications at discharge through 7 days follow up. | 7 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Experienced Safe Use of the System to Insert Femoral Vein to Sub-clavicular Exit as Assessed by Central Venous Access Placement in 30 Patients Attempted | Safety and Efficacy 90.0% (27/30) successful central venous catheter placements as assessed by patent open central venous access catheter. Ability to use the central venous access catheter for dialysis and infusion through 7 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Monica Tocchi, MD | Meditrial Europe Ltd. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Methodist Research Institute | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Central Venous Access Placement | Central venous access placement Central Venous Access Placement: Device inserted into the femoral vein to insert a central venous access catheter |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
patients with central venous disease with pathology impeding standard access methods
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Central Venous Access Placement | Central venous access placement Central Venous Access Placement: Device inserted into the femoral vein to insert a central venous access catheter |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Safe Insertion and Patency of Central Venous Access Catheter | Safety reported as 86.7% (26/30) % of subjects with no procedural complications at discharge through 7 days follow up. | Posted | Number | participants | 7 days |
|
|
4 weeks or 30 days
Overall number of participants who experienced adverse events as a result of the access procedure per definitions within 24 hours of occurrence.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Central Venous Access Placement | Central venous access placement Central Venous Access Placement: Device inserted into the femoral vein to insert a central venous access catheter |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotension | Renal and urinary disorders | Hypotension | Non-systematic Assessment | Hypovolemia causing Hypotension post dialysis, resolved with inpatient hospitalization greater than 24 hours |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| allergic reaction | Infections and infestations | allergic reaction | Non-systematic Assessment | one allergic reaction occurred rated as mild adverse event |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Research Organization and Trial Manager | mmc medical international services | 9492805700 | laura22@mmc-medical.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 7, 2017 | Jul 30, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients requiring venous access
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 7 days |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| chronic Kidney disease | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced Safe Use of the System to Insert Femoral Vein to Sub-clavicular Exit as Assessed by Central Venous Access Placement in 30 Patients Attempted | Safety and Efficacy 90.0% (27/30) successful central venous catheter placements as assessed by patent open central venous access catheter. Ability to use the central venous access catheter for dialysis and infusion through 7 days | patients treated with central venous access device | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 7 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 4 |
| 30 |
| 1 |
| 30 |
|
| Bleeding | Vascular disorders | bleeding | Non-systematic Assessment | Bleeding requiring transfusion and narcan and colloidal solution. In patient hospitalization greater than 24 hours |
|
| Hemodynamic Instability | Vascular disorders | hemodynamic unstable | Non-systematic Assessment | low blood pressure requiring vasopressors, extended hospitalization greater than 24 hours |
|
| unintended embolization | Vascular disorders | embolization | Non-systematic Assessment | anticoagulants administered, in patient hospitalization greater than 24 hours |
|
| bleeding | Vascular disorders | bleeding | Non-systematic Assessment | bleeding at the central venous access site, resolved with transfusion |
|
|
Not provided