Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Can professional performance and the probability of returning to work up to three years after medical rehabilitation be predicted by spiroergometric data (or performance of the cardiovascular system) together with psychological factors (motivation, self-efficacy) as well as physical activity, and their interaction? How are work related and health related factors associated with the The following variables: workload, work satisfaction, personal assessment of the professional future and psychological stress?
One main aim of medical rehabilitation is to restore ability to work. The goal is to increase health, as well as the performance and functional capacity of the the rehabilitant, in order to improve their occupational ability, as well as social activity and participation.
A number of the psychological and structural factors involved in this are already known. There is less evidence, however, regarding the importance of objectively measured performance and functioning, as well as the relation of these objective measures with subjective factors (i.e., the interaction of cardiovascular performance and physical activity with psychological factors with).
Therefore, this study investigates how rehabilitants can successfully decrease their professional vulnerability, and the importance of spiroergometric and psychological data to predict viability and return to work.
The aim is to improve the theorised variance in predicting the viability and return to work and, based on the results, to make appropriate recommendations to those affected and their social network, rehabilitation facilities, those offering rehabilitation services, employers and physicians.
The following research questions are to be answered with this study:
Can spiroergometric data and psychological mechanisms characterize:
(A) workability and physical activity, (B) self assessment of the professional future, (C) return to working life, (D) ability to deal with occupational burdens (professional capacity)
... 6, 12, 18 and 36 months after medical rehabilitation?
What is the significance of objective data compared to subjective characteristics (such as "higher level goals" in terms of employment), and how are the mediating psychological mechanisms involved?
In rehabilitation patients with degenerative skeletal diseases, a spiroergometry measurement (cardiovascular checkup) was carried out in 2013/2014 (group 1, G1). This study determined the performance of the cardiovascular system and the general "fitness". The patients were also questioned about age, workload, work satisfaction, assessment of the future of the profession and accompanying psychological stress.
A follow-up survey of those who are insured is to be carried out by telephone.
In addition, new patients (group 2, G2) are to be interviewed and spiroergometrically tested, as well as to be interviewed three times over the phone.
This will allow: (1) analyzing the change over time and the cardiovascular capacity beyond psychological factors (motivation, self-efficacy) and physical activity, (2) comparisons with other insured persons.
Data collection after rehabilitation is carried out as a computer-assisted telephone interview, and is conducted after the rehabilitation after 6, 12, 18 (G2) and 36 months (G1).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Group 1 will be questioned 36 months (in 2017) after their medical rehabilitation which was in 2013/2014. | ||
| Group 2 | Group 2 has the medical rehabilitation in 2017 and will be questioned at the end of the medical rehabilitation and 6, 12 and 18 months after that |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen absorption during stress test | Measured by VO2MAX (maximum oxygen consumption in ml / kg body weight / min) | 6 months |
| Workability, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include health status, employment history, current position, working hours, physical, mental or emotional restrictions to work | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Job satisfaction, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include earning capacity, whether job is mentally/physically/emotionally/inter-personally exhausting, skills required, whether recognition is received, independence, boring/challenging , overwhelming, continuous learning, whether important to the person | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Personal appraisal of the professional future, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include whether individual expects future work difficulties professionally and/or due to health restrictions | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Return to working life, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include how many hours individual desires to work again | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| The handling of occupational burdens, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Plans to participate and wishes to take measures to safeguard the earning capacity, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include personal reasons to safeguard earning capacity: money, feeling needed, interpersonal contact, recognition, knowledge/experience, fun, routine, development, mentally fitness, being outside the home, purpose in life, expectations from others, physical fitness, distraction from other problems |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
In the study insured members of the Deutsche Rentenversicherung Oldenburg-Bremen with a granted medical rehabilitation treatment at the Montanus-Klinik Bad Schwalbach will be asked to fill out a questionnaire when arriving at the rehabilitation clinic as well as to take part in three subsequent telephone interviews after 6,12 and 18 months.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sonia Lippke, Prof. Dr. | Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH | Bremen | 28759 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32345071 | Derived | Rinn R, Gan Y, Whittal A, Lippke S. Cardiopulmonary capacity and psychological factors are related to return to work in orthopedic rehabilitation patients. J Health Psychol. 2021 Nov;26(13):2505-2519. doi: 10.1177/1359105320913946. Epub 2020 Apr 28. |
Not provided
Not provided
There is no IPD sharing plan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Parameters include personal initiatives to make return to work practical: changing working conditions, reduction in work hours, different position, professional training, attended health promoting courses, attended coaching/counseling, engaged in self-help, lifestyle changes |
| After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Self-imposed objectives and achievement, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include personal objectives to achieve from rehabilitation: improved mobility, improved physical condition, improved physical illness and complaints, improved mental condition, improved interpersonal situation, improved professional situation, improved working capacity, weight loss, pain reduction, overall health promotion, deal with daily stress, more confidence | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Personal, social and contextual factors, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include: perceived job security, earning capacity risk, satisfaction with life, satisfaction with job-related activities, satisfaction with physical activity, social support, self-efficacy | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |
| Participation in interventions, as measured by questionnaire - change at 6, 12 and 18 months + at 36 months after rehabilitation | Parameters include participation in: medical treatments, psychological therapies, disease-specific group training, physical therapy, movement therapy, general health training, work-related measures, professional advice, relaxation techniques | After the rehabilitation treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months (G2) + at 36 months (G1) |