Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-A00258-33 | Other Identifier | ID-RCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS compared to that of a single intra-articular injection of the reference product SYNVISC-ONE in the treatment of symptomatic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. The primary endpoint was the change in mean score on the WOMAC pain scales from D0 to D180.
After a period of washout-out for NSAIDs, the patients received a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS or of SYNVISC-ONE in the most painful knee. The study involved a preselection visit at D-7 and five further visits: at D0 (baseline, evaluation before intra-articular injection), at D2 ± 2 days (injection), at D30 ± 15 days, at D90 ± 15 days and C5 at D180 ± 15 days.
To enrol the patients as quickly as possible, 129 sites, i.e. general medical or rheumatology practices, were open. After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the evaluating investigators assigned a randomisation number based on the chronological order of inclusion of patients at their site. The patient was then sent to the injecting investigator so that he/she could give the injection of the product corresponding to the randomisation number.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSTENIL PLUS | Experimental | A single intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate 40 mg/2.0 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0) |
|
| SYNVISC-ONE | Active Comparator | A single intra-articular injection of hylan G-F 20 48 mg/6 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSTENIL PLUS | Device | Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in WOMAC A | Change from baseline in the pain subscore (section A) of the WOMAC score | Day 0 to Day 180 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lequesne algofunctional index | Index assessing the severity of osteoarthritis | Day 0 to Day 180 |
| WOMAC B | Stiffness subscore (section B) of the WOMAC score |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of all adverse events | Recording of all adverse events and changes in concomitant treatments | Day 0 to Day 180 |
| Incidence of local adverse reactions | Recording of adverse manifestations such as post-injection pain, inflammatory reaction, presence of hydrarthrosis, presence of acute pseudoseptic or septic arthritis |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Renée Liliane Dreiser, Dr | APHP Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France | Study Chair |
| Bernard Avouac, Dr | APHP Henri Mondor, Creteil, France | Study Chair |
| Thomas Bardin, Prof. | APHP Lariboisière, Paris, France | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This study was a multicentre, prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled non-inferiority study in two parallel groups of patients followed up for six months.
Not provided
Not provided
To prevent the patients from knowing the nature of their treatment, the investigational products OSTENIL PLUS and SYNVISC-ONE were packed in identical neutral packs. OSTENIL PLUS and SYNVISC-ONE differ in appearance (product volume and viscosity, prefilled syringe) and were therefore readily identifiable by the investigator administering the investigational product (i.e. injecting investigator). The double-blind masking could be ensured thanks to the intervention of an observer who did not know the nature of the treatment, namely the evaluating investigator. The treatment was therefore administered blind to the evaluating investigator and the patient but not to the injecting investigator.
| SYNVISC-ONE |
| Device |
Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee |
|
| Day 0 to Day 180 |
| WOMAC C | Function subscore (section C) of the WOMAC score | Day 0 to Day 180 |
| Patient's overall status score in relation to his/her knee osteoarthritis | Visual analogue scale assessed by the patient | Day 0 to Day 180 |
| Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the patient | 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor) | Day 30 to Day 180 |
| Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the investigator | 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor) | Day 30 to Day 180 |
| Day 30 |
| Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the patient | 5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor) | Day 30 |
| Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the investigator | 5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor) | Day 30 |
| Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the investigator | 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor) | Day 30 to Day 180 |
| Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the patient | 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor) | Day 30 to Day 180 |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |