Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ocular safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ISV-305 (dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) compared with Vehicle in the treatment of inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ocular safety, tolerability, and efficacy of topical administration of ISV-305 (0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2) compared with Vehicle when dosed twice daily for 1 day prior to surgery, the day of surgery and 14 days post cataract surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISV-305 | Experimental | 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 |
|
| Vehicle | Placebo Comparator | DuraSite® 2 Vehicle |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISV-305 | Drug | Dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 twice daily for 16 days |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population | Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and > 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward). | Day 15 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment | Eye pain/discomfort in the study eye was evaluated at every visit except Visit 2 (Surgery; Day 0) using a VAS, scoring from 0 to 100 using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent; 100 = maximum). Participants were asked to rate the feeling of the symptom in the study eye from absent to extreme by moving a slide on the side of the scale to align with images of descriptive faces. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Research Center | Memphis | Tennessee | 38120 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ISV-305 | ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. |
| FG001 | Vehicle | Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Demographics were summarized for the Safety Population which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ISV-305 | ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. |
| BG001 | Vehicle |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population | Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and > 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward). | mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population, but were treated as failures. | Posted | Number | participants | Day 15 |
Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ISV-305 | ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iritis | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager, Clinical Sciences | InSite Vision | +91 9987096080 | manjiri.desai@sparcmail.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 25, 2017 | Jun 30, 2020 | Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 27, 2017 | Jun 30, 2020 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Vehicle |
| Other |
Vehicle twice daily for 16 days |
|
| Day 1 to Day 29 |
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Surgery Cancelled |
|
| Other - Various Administrative Reasons |
|
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment | Eye pain/discomfort in the study eye was evaluated at every visit except Visit 2 (Surgery; Day 0) using a VAS, scoring from 0 to 100 using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent; 100 = maximum). Participants were asked to rate the feeling of the symptom in the study eye from absent to extreme by moving a slide on the side of the scale to align with images of descriptive faces. | mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population but were treated as failures. | Posted | Number | Participants | Day 1 to Day 29 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 158 |
| 3 |
| 158 |
| 31 |
| 158 |
| EG001 | Vehicle | Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days. | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | 21 | 80 |
| Atrial flutter | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood magnesium decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary thrombosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Visual acuity reduced | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cystoid macular oedema | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye inflammation | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Foreign body sensation in eyes | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Visual impairment | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Intraocular pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The investigator agrees to submit the manuscript of any journal article, abstract or other presentation arising from an InSite Vision-sponsored clinical investigation to InSite Vision for editorial review prior to submission for publication or presentation. At the sponsor's request, if proprietary information is to be disclosed, proposed publications or presentations will be delayed until appropriate patent applications and/or legal documents of a similar nature have been filed.
| Pain Score of 0 on Day 15 |
|
| Pain Score of 0 on Day 18 |
|
| Pain Score of 0 on Day 29 |
|
| Statistical analysis of proportion of participants who achieved a pain score of 0 on the VAS on Day 8 | Chi-squared, Corrected | A Fisher's exact test was used if 1 or more of the cells had an expected frequency of ≤ 5. | <0.0001 | P-values were from a Chi-Square test (with continuity correction). | Odds Ratio (OR) | 4.337 | 2-Sided | 95 | 2.305 | 8.161 | Superiority | Statistical hypotheses testing for the secondary efficacy endpoints were two-sided and performed using a significance (alpha) level of 0.05. |
| Statistical analysis of proportion of participants who achieved a pain score of 0 on the VAS on Day 15 | Chi-squared, Corrected | A Fisher's exact test was used if 1 or more of the cells had an expected frequency of ≤ 5. | <0.0001 | P-values were from a Chi-Square test (with continuity correction). | Odds Ratio (OR) | 4.120 | 2-Sided | 95 | 2.113 | 8.033 | Superiority | Statistical hypotheses testing for the secondary efficacy endpoints were two-sided and performed using a significance (alpha) level of 0.05. |
| Statistical analysis of proportion of participants who achieved a pain score of 0 on the VAS on Day 18 | Chi-squared, Corrected | A Fisher's exact test was used if 1 or more of the cells had an expected frequency of ≤ 5. | 0.0043 | P-values were from a Chi-Square test (with continuity correction). | Odds Ratio (OR) | 2.580 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.380 | 4.822 | Superiority | Statistical hypotheses testing for the secondary efficacy endpoints were two-sided and performed using a significance (alpha) level of 0.05. |
| Statistical analysis of proportion of participants who achieved a pain score of 0 on the VAS on Day 29 | Chi-squared, Corrected | A Fisher's exact test was used if 1 or more of the cells had an expected frequency of ≤ 5. | 0.0005 | P-values were from a Chi-Square test (with continuity correction). | Odds Ratio (OR) | 3.277 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.695 | 6.335 | Superiority | Statistical hypotheses testing for the secondary efficacy endpoints were two-sided and performed using a significance (alpha) level of 0.05. |