Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Central Finland Hospital District | OTHER |
| Helsinki University Central Hospital | OTHER |
| Turku University Hospital | OTHER_GOV |
| Tampere University Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded, three armed parallel 1:1:1, multicenter trial. The research objective is to determine, which treatment strategy 1) primary percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) followed by surgical limited fasciectomy (LF) in patients who do not respond to PNF, 2) primary collagenase clostridium histolyticym (CCH) followed by LF in patients who do not respond to CCH or 3) LF as the primary (and secondary) treatment modality is the most cost-effective in treating Dupuytren´s contracture. Short- and long-term results will be published.
Dupuytren's contracture (DC) is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palmar fascia, which in time leads to flexion contracture in one or more fingers. Etiology of the disease is still unknown, but it strongly seems that genetic factors play a major role. DC is associated most commonly with Caucasian population groups from Northern Europe. The estimated global prevalence among whites is 3% to 6% and increases with age. Men women ratio is 7:1. There is no definitive cure for DC. The treatment aims at relieving the symptoms by releasing the contracture by percutaneous or operative techniques.
The investigators planned a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded, three armed parallel 1:1:1, multicenter trial comparing the cost-effectiveness of 1) collagenase clostridium histolyticum followed by limited fasciectomy in non-responsive cases, 2) percutaneous needle fasciotomy followed by limited fasciectomy in non-responsive cases and 3) primary limited fasciectomy in short- and long-term follow-up in DC.
Protocol is approved by Tampere university hospital institutional review board and Finnish Medicine Agency (Fimea). All patients will give written informed consent. The results of the trial will be disseminated as published articles in peer-reviewed journals.
Treatment of Duputren's contracture aims at reducing the functional deficit caused by the contracture. Recurrence is almost inevitable if the follow-up is long enough. Therefore, the investigators aim to analyze the effectiveness of three different treatment strategies in long-term follow-up, in addition to short-term follow-up, which include multiple interventions rather than just single intervention. The investigators chose a pragmatic primary outcome, which comprises both objective and subjective standpoint and reflects the needs of the patients as well as goals of the healthcare system. Furthermore, our short-term results give good high quality level evidence of effectiveness of all the three treatments and long-term follow-up a good perspective to the cost-effectiveness of the strategies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) | Experimental | PNF is a treatment in which the Dupuytren's contracture cord causing the contracture is not excised, but only divided with a hypodermic needle. |
|
| Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) | Experimental | Generic name of the drug is collagenase clostridium histolyticum. Dosage form is injectable powder, dosage 0.58 mg and frequency is one injection in four weeks up to three times. One injection is performed normally at least to three different places in the cord. |
|
| Limited fasciectomy (LF) | Active Comparator | In LF, the thickened part of the palmar fascia causing the contracture is excised through skin incision. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) | Procedure | The division of the cord can be made under local anesthesia in the clinic and takes only a few minutes to perform. It can be performed whenever the cord is palpable. There are only puncture wounds left, and hence, the patient can start normal use of the hand the day after the procedure. If patient seeks for a treatment and the recurrence of the disease can not be treated by the PNF or patient is not willing to new PNF patient will be treated with LF. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of success | Success is a composite outcome comprising of 1) at least 50% contracture release from the recruitment and 2) patient is in patient accepted symptom state (PASS). PASS is defined by question: "Would you be satisfied and not in need for any other treatment if the functional impairment caused by the contracture would remain the same as it is today for the rest of your life?". Primary time point is five years' follow-up visit. | 5 year follow-ups |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| QuickDASH | QuickDASH questionnaire is a validated upper extremity specific questionnaire consisting of 11 tasks/questions about the functional capacity and the pain. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Perceived hand function |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mikko P Räisänen, M.D. | Tampere University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Harry J Göransson, M.D., Ph.D., adjunct professor | Tampere University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Aleksi RP Reito, M.D., Ph.D., adjunct professor | Central Finland Hospital District | Principal Investigator |
| Hannu Kautiainen, MSc | Medcare Ltd | Principal Investigator |
| Antti OV Malmivaara, M.D., Ph.D., adjunct professor | Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Hospital of Central Finland | Jyväskylä | Central Finland | 40620 | Finland | ||
| Oulu University hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29599391 | Background | Raisanen MP, Karjalainen T, Goransson H, Reito A, Kautiainen H, Malmivaara A, Leppanen OV. DupuytrEn Treatment EffeCtiveness Trial (DETECT): a protocol for prospective, randomised, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded, three-armed parallel 1:1:1, multicentre trial comparing the effectiveness and cost of collagenase clostridium histolyticum, percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy as short-term and long-term treatment strategies in Dupuytren's contracture. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 28;8(3):e019054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019054. | |
| 38346307 |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Protocol | View IPD |
All the IPD will be shared with other researchers by request.
Data will be available after finishing the trial and it will be available for 15 years.
Request.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 29, 2017 | Apr 26, 2018 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004387 | Dupuytren Contracture |
| D003286 | Contracture |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005350 | Fibroma |
| D018218 | Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue |
| D009372 | Neoplasms, Connective Tissue |
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003012 | Microbial Collagenase |
| C570746 | xiapex |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017364 | Collagenases |
| D008666 | Metalloendopeptidases |
| D010450 | Endopeptidases |
| D010447 | Peptide Hydrolases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Kuopio University Hospital | OTHER |
| Oulu University Hospital | OTHER |
| Medcare Oy | OTHER |
| Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare | OTHER_GOV |
| Orton Orthopaedic Hospital | OTHER |
This is a multicenter, randomized, outcome assessor blinded, three parallel armed (1:1:1), superiority trial comparing needle fasciotomy, collagenase injection and surgery as primary intervention for people with treatment-naïve Dupuytren's contracture with a five-year follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Outcome assessors who measured index, middle, ring and small fingers' flexion and extension degrees were blinded. Patients had opaque gloves in their hand when visiting the blinded outcome assessor. Due to the nature of the treatments it was not possible to blind patients, leading investigators or research assistants. To minimize any bias in interpreting the findings, we blinded treatment allocation in the draft results manuscript with groups labelled as A, B and C. The writing committee reached consensus on the interpretation of the findings prior to being unblinded to group assignments.
|
|
| Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) 2.9 MG/ML [Xiaflex] | Drug | CCH chemically dissolves type I collagen of which the cord is composed of. It is injected inside the cord at least three different places in the outpatient clinic and the cord can be ruptured by gently force after one to three days. If patient seeks for a treatment and the recurrence of the disease can not be treated by the CCH or patient is not willing to new CCH patient will be treated with LF. |
|
|
| Limited fasciectomy (LF) | Procedure | LF is performed in general or regional anesthesia in operating room. Constricting cords will be excised under direct vision. LF has been the dominant technique of surgical treatment. If patient seeks for a treatment the recurrence of the disease will be treated with LF as long as needed. |
|
|
Perceived hand function will be assessed pre- and postoperatively by VAS scale.
| 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Global rating | Global rating to treatment effect will be evaluated by question: "How would you rate the function of your hand compared to the situation before the treatment?". The options are in 5-step Likert scale from (-2) Much worse to (+2) Much better: This question is also used as anchor question in the MCII analysis in which +1 and +2 are considered to present meaningful improvement to the patient. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| EQ-5D-3L | EQ-5D-3L is a generic instrument for assessing quality of life comprising 5 dimensions and VAS for health level. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Rate of Patient Accepted Symptom State | PASS is a relevant patient-centered outcome measurement, which reflects the overall state in which patients consider themselves as being well. It is a state of the symptoms between complete remission and subjective dissatisfaction with the symptoms. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Rate of patients achieving clinically significant improvement | Percentage of patients achieving clinically significant improvement (50% better PED) will be assessed. | 10 year follow-up |
| Rate of patients achieving full contracture release | Percentage of patients achieving full contracture release (PED 0°-5°) will be assessed. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Willingness to undergo same treatment | Patient satisfaction with the treatment will be assessed by a simple "yes" or "no" question: "Would you prefer the same treatment again, if the result would be the same as it is now?" | 3 months and 2 year follow-ups |
| Major adverse events | In the trial will be reported major adverse events, which include: tendon rupture, nerve injury, arterial injury, CRPS and infection, skin rupture or hematoma that needs hospitalization/revision surgery. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Extension deficits | The total passive extension deficit (TPED) and passive extension deficit (PED) of metacarpophalangeal (MPJ) and proximal interphalangeal (PIPJ) joints are used in almost all of the DC studies. Most of the studies used the PED as their primary outcome. In this trial, the TPED and PED of MPJ and PIPJ are used as secondary outcomes. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Total maximum flexion | Patients are seeking help for their extension deficit in DC but in the end flexion of the fingers is more important for the hand function. Our treatments should not jeopardize finger flexion in an effort to reduce the extension deficit. | 3 months, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Expenses | The costs are assessed by allocating previously estimated costs for interventions to each of the treatment arm. | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Progression of the disease | Recurrence or extension is treated if the patient contacts the study center and requires new treatment (ie, patient is not in the PASS anymore) and at least 20° flexion contracture is observed in one of the joints. Progression of disease is measured and reported in three levels: (1) rate of reinterventions in the arm due to recurrence or extension of the disease (clinically relevant progression); (2) costs of reinterventions (impact of progression); and (3) change in TPED in those patients who do not require further treatments (clinically irrelevant progression). | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Recurrence of the disease | In this study recurrence is defined when patient considers not being in PASS anymore and seeks for further treatment, and has at least 20° contracture. | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Extension of the disease | Extension means that the disease will be activated in other rays than treated after the treatment. | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Progression-free-survival | Progression-free-survival will be counted to each arm as mean time. | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Favored treatment modality questionnaire | Favored treatment modality will be asked from patients who undergo several treatment modalities (i.e. LF after CCH or PNF). Outcome will be assessed by question: "If you presented with a contracture for the first time now, would you prefer needle fasciotomy/injectable drug as the primary treatment or would prefer having surgery at first place?" | 2, 5 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Rate of success | Success is a composite outcome comprising of 1) at least 50% contracture release from the recruitment and 2) patient is in patient accepted symptom state (PASS). PASS is defined by question: "Would you be satisfied and not in need for any other treatment if the functional impairment caused by the contracture would remain the same as it is today for the rest of your life?". Primary time point is five years' follow-up visit. | 3 months, 2 and 10 year follow-ups |
| Oulu |
| North Ostrobothnia |
| 90220 |
| Finland |
| Kuopio University hospital | Kuopio | Northern Savonia | 70029 | Finland |
| Tampere University Hospital | Tampere | Pirkanmaa | 33521 | Finland |
| Turku University Hospital | Turku | Southwest Finland | 20521 | Finland |
| Helsinki University hospital | Helsinki | Uusimaa | 00029 | Finland |
| Result |
| Raisanen MP, Leppanen OV, Soikkeli J, Reito A, Malmivaara A, Buchbinder R, Kautiainen H, Kaivorinne A, Stjernberg-Salmela S, Lappalainen M, Luokkala T, Ponkko A, Taskinen HS, Paakkonen M, Jaatinen K, Juurakko J, Karjalainen VL, Karjalainen T. Surgery, Needle Fasciotomy, or Collagenase Injection for Dupuytren Contracture : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Mar;177(3):280-290. doi: 10.7326/M23-1485. Epub 2024 Feb 13. |
| 41334972 | Derived | Karjalainen VL, Soikkeli J, Raisanen MP, Leppanen OV, Reito A, Stjernberg-Salmela S, Buchbinder R, Karjalainen T. Progression of Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgery, Needle Fasciotomy, and Collagenase Injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 Jul 1;158(1):101-112. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012666. Epub 2025 Dec 4. |
Protocol in BMJ Open access |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D006867 |
| Hydrolases |
| D004798 | Enzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D045726 | Metalloproteases |