Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-005035-33 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a three period study design consisting of a 6-month, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment (period 1) followed by a 6-month, open-label treatment (period 2) and a follow-up treatment period (period 3).
Primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of REGN2477 in male and female patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP).
Primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of REGN2477 versus placebo on the change from baseline in heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients with FOP, as determined by 18-NaF uptake in HO lesions by positron emission tomography (PET) and in total volume of HO lesions by computed tomography (CT).
Key Secondary objectives are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGN2477 | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGN2477 | Drug | Pharmaceutical form: liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment periods 1 and 2. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported. | Up to Week 28 |
| Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported. | Up to Week 28 |
| Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve [AUC]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. | Baseline and Week 28 |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO) | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. |
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial Management | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States | ||
| University of Pennsylvania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41806277 | Derived | Baldasaro J, Sanchez RJ, Hartford C, Dahir KM, Keen R, Funck-Brentano T, Pignolo RJ, Davis M, Altman DE. Content Validation of the Flares Diary: A Qualitative Analysis of the Flares Experience Within the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Population. Adv Ther. 2026 Apr;43(4):1827-1844. doi: 10.1007/s12325-026-03506-6. Epub 2026 Mar 10. | |
| 39381032 |
Not provided
Not provided
This was a three period study design which consisted of a 6-month (28 weeks), randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (Period 1) followed by a 6-month (28 weeks), open-label treatment period (Period 2) and a 20 week follow-up treatment period (Period 3). Participants could continue receiving REGN2477 every 4 weeks beyond week 76 provided that no safety signals were identified.
A total of 48 participants were screened, out of which, 44 participants were randomized and treated.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to REGN2477 intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. |
| FG001 | REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 28, 2020 | Sep 15, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Matching placebo | Drug | Pharmaceutical form: Liquid product for injection/infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous (IV); Administered during treatment period 1 only. |
|
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported. |
| Week 28 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as "new HO lesions." Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Week 28 |
| Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC) | The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC) | Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported. | Week 8 |
| Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO) | Percent change in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported. | Week 8 |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO) | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. | Week 28 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28 | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline. | Baseline, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported. | Week 28, Week 56 |
| Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported. | Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported. | Week 28 to Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent change from baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56 | Baseline, Week 56 |
| Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. | Week 28 up to Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary | Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported. | Week 28 to Week 56 |
| Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups | Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported. | Week 28 to Week 56 |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported. | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug). | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 |
| Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses < 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, >= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing. | Up to Week 76 |
| Philadelphia |
| Pennsylvania |
| 19104 |
| United States |
| Vanderbilt University | Nashville | Tennessee | 37240 | United States |
| Toronto General Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2C4 | Canada |
| Hopital Cochin | Paris | 75014 | France |
| Hopital Lariboisiere,Hospitalier Universitaire Nord | Paris | 751010 | France |
| Giannina Gaslini Institute | Genova | 16147 | Italy |
| VU University Medical Center | Amsterdam | North Holland | 1081 HV | Netherlands |
| Szpital Wojewodzki Nr 2 | Rzeszów | 35-301 | Poland |
| Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill | Stanmore | Middlesex | HA7 4LP | United Kingdom |
| de Ruiter RD, Botman E, Teunissen BP, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R, Raijmakers PG, Schwarte LA, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Gonzalez Trotter D, Eekhoff EMW, Yaqub M. Performance of simplified methods for quantification of [18F]NaF uptake in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Front Nucl Med. 2024 Jul 22;4:1406947. doi: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1406947. eCollection 2024. |
| 39216107 | Derived | Keen R, Dahir KM, McGinniss J, Sanchez RJ, Mellis S, Economides AN, Di Rocco M, Orcel P, Roux C, Tabarkiewicz J, Bachiller-Corral J, Cheung AM, Al Mukaddam M, Mohammadi K, Gu J, Srinivasan D, Trotter DG, Eekhoff EMW, Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ. Characterization of flare-ups and impact of garetosmab in adults with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LUMINA-1 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Sep 26;39(10):1486-1492. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae140. |
| 37770652 | Derived | Di Rocco M, Forleo-Neto E, Pignolo RJ, Keen R, Orcel P, Funck-Brentano T, Roux C, Kolta S, Madeo A, Bubbear JS, Tabarkiewicz J, Szczepanek M, Bachiller-Corral J, Cheung AM, Dahir KM, Botman E, Raijmakers PG, Al Mukaddam M, Tile L, Portal-Celhay C, Sarkar N, Hou P, Musser BJ, Boyapati A, Mohammadi K, Mellis SJ, Rankin AJ, Economides AN, Trotter DG, Herman GA, O'Meara SJ, DelGizzi R, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Eekhoff EMW, Kaplan FS. Garetosmab in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2023 Oct;29(10):2615-2624. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02561-8. Epub 2023 Sep 28. |
| 32557665 | Derived | Vanhoutte F, Liang S, Ruddy M, Zhao A, Drewery T, Wang Y, DelGizzi R, Forleo-Neto E, Rajadhyaksha M, Herman G, Davis JD. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Garetosmab (Anti-Activin A): Results From a First-in-Human Phase 1 Study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;60(11):1424-1431. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1638. Epub 2020 Jun 18. |
| 32515349 | Derived | Aykul S, Corpina RA, Goebel EJ, Cunanan CJ, Dimitriou A, Kim HJ, Zhang Q, Rafique A, Leidich R, Wang X, McClain J, Jimenez J, Nannuru KC, Rothman NJ, Lees-Shepard JB, Martinez-Hackert E, Murphy AJ, Thompson TB, Economides AN, Idone V. Activin A forms a non-signaling complex with ACVR1 and type II Activin/BMP receptors via its finger 2 tip loop. Elife. 2020 Jun 9;9:e54582. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54582. |
Participants received a single dose of REGN2477 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1.
| FG002 | Placebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants who were in the placebo group in Period 1 crossed over to receive a single dose of REGN2477 IV infusion Q4W for 28 weeks during Period 2 followed by 20 weeks during Period 3. |
| FG003 | REGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants who were in the REGN2477 group in Period 1 continued treatment with a single dose of REGN2477 IV infusion Q4W for additional 28 weeks during Period 2 followed by 20 weeks during Period 3. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Period 2 (28 Weeks Open-label) |
|
|
| Period 3 (20 Weeks Follow-up) |
|
|
The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants and was based on the treatment allocated.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to REGN2477 intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. |
| BG001 | REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants received a single dose of REGN2477 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Total Lesion Activity by fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (18 F-NaF) PET (AHO Analysis Set) | 18^F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was used to assess lesion and disease activity. | The baseline-active HO analysis set (AHO) includes all randomized patients who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; it is based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Mean | Standard Deviation | gram (g) |
| |||||||||||||
| Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) (AHO Analysis Set) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. The baseline-Active Heterotopic ossification (AHO) analysis set includes all randomized patients who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; it is based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Mean | Standard Deviation | cubic centimeter (cm^3) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Total Lesion Activity by 18F-NaF PET (AHOC Analysis Set) | 18^F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was used to assess lesion and disease activity. | The baseline-active HO classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation analysis set (AHOC) includes all randomized patients with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one active HO lesion(s) at baseline, as defined by 18F-NaF PET positivity; it is based on the treatment allocated (as randomized) | Mean | Standard Deviation | gram (g) |
| |||||||||||||
| Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT (AHOC Analysis Set) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. | The baseline-active HO classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation analysis set (AHOC) includes all randomized patients with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one active HO lesion(s) at baseline, as defined by 18F-NaF PET positivity; it is based on the treatment allocated (as randomized) | Mean | Standard Deviation | cubic centimeter (cm^3) |
| |||||||||||||
| Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Genetic Mutation | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported. | The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Week 28 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity | Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported. | The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Week 28 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve [AUC]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. | Baseline-active heterotopic ossification analysis set (AHO) included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent Change | Baseline and Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported. | AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent Change | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as "new HO lesions." Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO Lesions | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent Change | Week 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent Change | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO) | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. | AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Week 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC) | The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a Scale | Week 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC) | Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) as Assessed by 18^F-NaFPET at Week 8 (AHO) | Percent change in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of individual active HO site(s) as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 in AHO analysis set is reported. | AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC) | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | HO Lesions | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHO) | Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in AHO analysis set is reported. | AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | HO Lesions | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHOC) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions was detectable by CT using AHOC analysis set is reported. | AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 [R206H] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | HO Lesions | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 1: Change From Baseline in Number of HO Lesions Detectable by CT at Week 28 (AHO) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Change from baseline in number of HO lesions detectable by CT at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported. | AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | HO Lesions | Week 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO lesions | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to positron-emission tomography (PET). Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO lesions | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET). Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to week 28 scan is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET versus from Baseline to Week 28 | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Active lesions | Week 28, Week 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Change From Week 28 in Number of Active HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Scan at Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Change from Week 28 to Week 56 as assessed by CT Scan versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Active lesions | Week 28, Week 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 only (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO Lesions | Baseline, Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative baseline is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who receive a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan is collected and the period between any consecutive doses is less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO Lesions | Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by CT at week 56 relative to baseline were reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NAF PET at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | New HO Lesions | Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | 18^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Percentage of participants with new HO lesions as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at week 56 relative to baseline. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Total Lesion Activity (TLA) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET in New HO Lesions at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | TLA is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. Activity of individual HO lesions was calculated as the product of mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) and the PET volume of the active HO lesion. TLA was derived for each participant at each time point as the sum of HO lesion activity of individual target and new active HO lesions. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | gram (g) | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 28, Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2 vs. Period 1: Percent Change From Week 28 in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (Period 2) Versus the Same Participants Between Baseline and Week 28 (Period 1) (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Difference of Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 versus from Baseline to Week 28 is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 28, Week 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: TLA in New HO Lesions as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Total Lesion Activity (TLA) is a measure of participant-level cumulative burden of metabolically active HO. TLA in New (Relative to Baseline) Lesions at Week 56 is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | gram (g) | Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Total Volume of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT Only at Week 56 Relative to Baseline (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT Only: Computed Tomography (CT) assessment without reference to Positron-Emission Tomography (PET); Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT only at week 56 relative to baseline is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cubic centimeter (cm^3) | Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in TLA as Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent change from baseline in TLA as assessed by 18^F-NaF PET to week 56 were reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT to Week 56 were reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percent Change From Week 28 in SUVmax as Assessed by 18^F-NaF to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent Change from Week 28 to Week 56 is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Week 28 to Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to Week 56 (AHO COVID-19 mITT) | Percent change from baseline in 18^F-NaF PET SUVmax to week 56 | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to week 28 for participants on treatment during period 2 (Placebo/REGN2477) as planned. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | Baseline, Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Daily Average Pain Due to FOP Measured Using the Daily NRS | The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a Scale | Week 28 up to Week 56 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Flare-ups Assessed by Participant E-diary | Percentage of participants with flare-ups starting between week 28 and week 56 as assessed by participant E-diary is reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 28 to Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Period 2: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Flare-ups | Percentage of participants with investigator-assessed flare-ups were reported. | COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Data were planned to be collected and analyzed only for participants switching to REGN2477 in period 2 for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 28 to Week 56 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentration of Total Activin A in Serum | Concentration of total activin A in serum over time is reported. | The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. ("Number Analyzed" equals number of participants evaluable at that time point) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milligram per Liter (mg/L) | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Concentrations of Functional REGN2477 in Serum | Concentrations of REGN2477 capable of target binding were measured (functional drug). | The PK analysis set included all treated participants who received any study drug and who had at least 1 non-missing drug concentration following the first dose of study drug. ("Number Analyzed" equals number of participants evaluable at that time point) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/L | Week 28, Week 56, Week 76 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Periods 1, 2, and 3: Number of Participants With Clinical Impact of Treatment-Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN2477 | Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses < 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, >= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the REGN2477 ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing. | The Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) analysis set included all participants who received study drug and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first study dose. "Overall number of participants analyzed" are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Week 76 |
|
From first dose of study drug to end of study
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to REGN2477 intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. | 0 | 24 | 2 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| EG001 | REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants received a single dose of REGN2477 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 28 weeks during Period 1. | 0 | 20 | 4 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| EG002 | Placebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants who were in the placebo group in Period 1 crossed over to receive a single dose of REGN2477 IV infusion Q4W for 28 weeks during Period 2 followed by 20 weeks during Period 3. | 2 | 24 | 6 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| EG003 | REGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W | Participants who were in the REGN2477 group in Period 1 continued treatment with a single dose of REGN2477 IV infusion Q4W for additional 28 weeks during Period 2 followed by 20 weeks during Period 3. Participants could continue receiving REGN2477 every 4 weeks beyond week 76 provided that no safety signals were identified. | 3 | 19 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 19 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perineal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subcutaneous abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skull fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Splenic rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Temporomandibular joint syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Calcification of muscle | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coccydynia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Exostosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal mass | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint noise | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal discomfort | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in jaw | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Burning sensation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical radiculopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head discomfort | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post-traumatic headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decubitus ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkeratosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin lesion | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne cystic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blister | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermal cyst | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ecchymosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hirsutism | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertrichosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intertrigo | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Madarosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nail bed bleeding | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Onychalgia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Onycholysis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Papule | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perioral dermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Petechiae | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash pruritic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash vesicular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin exfoliation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess rupture | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorectal cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis orbital | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Furuncle | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Groin abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hordeolum | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected bite | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected dermal cyst | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Otitis externa | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Otitis media acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paronychia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pustule | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin bacterial infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subcutaneous abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulval abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvovaginal mycotic infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mouth ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dental caries | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gingival pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Glossodynia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematochezia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lip blister | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Noninfective gingivitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemoptysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal dryness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal discomfort | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Productive cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract inflammation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper-airway cough syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vessel puncture site bruise | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling hot | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device site bruise | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Extraskeletal ossification | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post-traumatic pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Animal bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post vaccination syndrome | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular access site swelling | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somatic symptom disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Increased tendency to bruise | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymph node pain | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphadenitis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Microcytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crystal urine present | Investigations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fibrin D dimer increased | Investigations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet function test abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| SARS-CoV-2 test positive | Investigations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count increased | Investigations | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gilbert's syndrome | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sebaceous naevus | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conductive deafness | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear discomfort | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear pain | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear pruritus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperacusis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoacusis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ocular hypertension | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Photophobia | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Melanocytic naevus | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acquired phimosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometrial thickening | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menstruation irregular | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perineal cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (23.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
The investigator has the right to independently publish study results from the investigator's site after a multi-center publication, or a defined period after the completion of the study by all sites. The investigator must provide the sponsor a copy of any such publication derived from the study for review and comment in advance of any submission, and delay publication, if requested, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trials Administrator | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc | 844-734-6643 | clinicaltrials@regeneron.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 23, 2020 | Sep 15, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009221 | Myositis Ossificans |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009220 | Myositis |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|