Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Currently, the application status of MSCs as treatment modalities in IPF is still in its infancy and remains exploratory. Although a number of safety and efficacy clinical trials of MSCs as therapeutic options in immune-mediated and cardiac diseases have already been published with tantalizing results, to our disappointment, pulmonary and critical care medicine have traditionally lagged behind other therapeutic and research fields including hematology, gastroenterology and cardiology in translational studies of the use of reparative cells
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPF patients | Experimental | autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | Biological | intravenous infusion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| number of participants with treatment related side effects as infection, allergic reaction, disease acute exacerbation, and ectopic tissue formation | safety and side effects | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post therapy diffusing capacity of CO% (DLCO)predicted | Efficacy of procedure | 6-12 months |
| post therapy forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted. | efficacy of the procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6-12 months |