An Investigation With an Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence

An Open Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Investigation With an Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Comparison to Using Standard of Care

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-armed multi-center pre-market trial. Nighty-six (96) subjects will be recruited at sites in Sweden. Patients with diagnosed stress urinary incontinence (SUI), will be considered as potential study participants. After written informed consent has been acquired, a medical and surgical history, a physical examination (including pelvic examination), and a confirmation of the diagnosis of SUI will be performed, followed by a confirmation of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study subjects fulfilling all the eligibility criteria will thereafter be randomized 3:1 into either the TVS group or the standard of care (SoC) group.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Signed Informed Consent Form
2. Over the age of 18 years
3. Women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence
4. Normal voiding without residual urine ≤100mL
5. Leakage of at least 10 grams per 24 hours (based on pad-weight test)
6. Provoking test with leakage

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of dominated urgency's symptoms
2. Any contraindication for the investigational device; such as hypersensitivity to silicon rubber
3. Unexplained pelvic bleeding or vaginal discharge
4. Is hysterectomized,has a history of incontinent surgery or surgery for prolapse correction.
5. The woman is currently using prolapse ring
6. Women with prolapse reaching the hymus during coughing.
7. Pregnant or suspicion of pregnancy
8. Urinary tract or vaginal infection
9. History of not being able to use tampons
10. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction
11. The patient is to start, or change an ongoing, pelvic floor training
12. If the patient does not have a well adjusted diuretica, or is to start, or change an ongoing, diuretic treatment
13. The patient is participating in another study on SUI
14. Any other condition that as judged by the investigator may make follow-up or investigations inappropriate
15. Any patient that according to the Declaration of Helsinki is unsuitable for enrollment