Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this clinical study is to assess the cutaneous and ocular local tolerance of two cosmetic facial cleansers in healthy female participants with sensitive skin under normal conditions of use.
This is an assessor blind (dermatologist and ophthalmologist) clinical in use study to determine the local cutaneous and ocular tolerance of two cosmetic facial cleanser products when used as per the intended instructions for use in a population of healthy female participants with clinically assessed sensitive skin.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test product 1 | Experimental | All the participants in this arm will receive test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
|
| Test product 2 | Experimental | All the participants in this arm will receive test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micellar cleanser | Other | Participants will apply the micellar cleanser topically twice a day (morning and evening). Micellar cleanser will be applied on cotton pad and wiped over the entire face and closed eye to gently cleanse. No need to rub or rinse the micellar cleanser. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Combined Dermatologist Score | The intensity of any visual signs of irritation was recorded according to Dermal response score: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal popular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, and 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Dermatologist also provided a superficial irritation score if the dermal response score >0. Superficial irritation score was as follow: grade A/score 0=Slight glazed appearance, grade B/score 1=Marked glazing, grade C/score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, grade F/score 3=Glazing with fissures, grade G/score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, and grade H/score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. The combined score was equal the sum of the dermal response score plus the numerical equivalent of the superficial irritation score. Full range 0-10. | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Frequency of Combined Ophthalmologist Score | Ocular irritation assessed through the observation of the presence of two factors: Lacrimation Intensity and Conjunctiva Involvement. Conjunctiva involvement score are as follow: 0= None - No involvement, 1= Mild - Conjunctivae (palpebral and bulbar) injected above normal with possible chemosis (swelling); no discharge, 2= Moderate - Conjunctivae injected above normal; obvious swelling; possible discharge, and 3= Severe - Conjunctivae more diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible; excessive swelling and/or discharge. Lacrimal intensity score are as follow: 0= None - No lacrimation observed, 1= Mild-Excessive wetness (no distinct tears), 2= Moderate - A few formed tears (contained in orbit), and 3= Severe - Intense tearing (leaving orbit). The combined ophthalmologist score was calculated in the following way: Combined ophthalmologist score = conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score. Full range 0-6. | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Frequency of Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score | The combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated as the sum of the combined dermatologist score (i.e., dermal response score + superficial irritation score) and the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face | Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your face?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Combined score face was obtained by summing the 5 subject assessments for face i.e. redness, dryness, burning, itching and stinging. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline (for GlaxoSmithKline; Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company; Sirtris, a GSK Company; Stiefel, a GSK Company; ViiV Healthcare) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Campinas | São Paulo | 13084-791 | Brazil | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 190 participants were screened for the study, out of which 122 participants were enrolled and 68 participants were not eligible to meet study criteria. Out of 122 enrolled participants, 113 were randomized. Out of 77 nonrandomized participants, 73 did not meet the study criteria, 1 had an adverse event (AE), and 3 were lost to follow-up.
All the participants were enrolled from one center in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Test Product 1 | All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
| FG001 | Test Product 2 | All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Test Product 1 | All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
| BG001 | Test Product 2 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Frequency of Combined Dermatologist Score | The intensity of any visual signs of irritation was recorded according to Dermal response score: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal popular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, and 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Dermatologist also provided a superficial irritation score if the dermal response score >0. Superficial irritation score was as follow: grade A/score 0=Slight glazed appearance, grade B/score 1=Marked glazing, grade C/score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, grade F/score 3=Glazing with fissures, grade G/score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, and grade H/score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. The combined score was equal the sum of the dermal response score plus the numerical equivalent of the superficial irritation score. Full range 0-10. | Intent to Treat (ITT, N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. No inferential statistic were performed for this outcome. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
Approximately 21 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Test Product 1 | All the participants in this arm will receive test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRY EYE | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 26, 2017 | Jun 20, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 7, 2017 | Jun 20, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Micellar foaming cleanser | Other | Participants will use the micellar foaming cleanser topically twice a day (morning and evening). Micellar foaming cleanser will be massaged gently onto wet skin on the face using fingertips. After which participants will rinse thoroughly and pat the skin dry. |
|
| After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score (Modified) | A modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated, where the superficial irritation component was removed from the equation. Therefore, the modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was defined as the dermal response score + the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation. | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye | Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your eyes?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0. | Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product use |
| Campinas |
| São Paulo |
| 13084- |
| Brazil |
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Test Product 1 | All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
| OG001 | Test Product 2 | All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. |
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Combined Ophthalmologist Score | Ocular irritation assessed through the observation of the presence of two factors: Lacrimation Intensity and Conjunctiva Involvement. Conjunctiva involvement score are as follow: 0= None - No involvement, 1= Mild - Conjunctivae (palpebral and bulbar) injected above normal with possible chemosis (swelling); no discharge, 2= Moderate - Conjunctivae injected above normal; obvious swelling; possible discharge, and 3= Severe - Conjunctivae more diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible; excessive swelling and/or discharge. Lacrimal intensity score are as follow: 0= None - No lacrimation observed, 1= Mild-Excessive wetness (no distinct tears), 2= Moderate - A few formed tears (contained in orbit), and 3= Severe - Intense tearing (leaving orbit). The combined ophthalmologist score was calculated in the following way: Combined ophthalmologist score = conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score. Full range 0-6. | ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. No inferential statistic were performed for this outcome. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score | The combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated as the sum of the combined dermatologist score (i.e., dermal response score + superficial irritation score) and the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation. | ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
|
|
|
| Primary | Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score (Modified) | A modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated, where the superficial irritation component was removed from the equation. Therefore, the modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was defined as the dermal response score + the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation. | ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 21 (+2) days of test product use |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face | Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your face?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Combined score face was obtained by summing the 5 subject assessments for face i.e. redness, dryness, burning, itching and stinging. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0. | ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product use |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye | Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your eyes?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0. | ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product use |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 55 |
| 0 |
| 55 |
| 5 |
| 55 |
| EG001 | Test Product 2 | All the participants in this arm will receive test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days. | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 | 4 | 58 |
| OCULAR HYPERAEMIA | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INFLUENZA | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ORAL HERPES | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DRY SKIN | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| RASH MACULAR | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ACNE | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PAPULE | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SKIN EXFOLIATION | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LIP ULCERATION | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| THERMAL BURN | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| At Day 21, Score 1 |
|
| At Day 21, 1 |
|
| At Day 21, 1 |
|
| At Baseline, 1=Mild |
|
| At Baseline, 2=Moderate |
|
| At Baseline, 3=Severe |
|
| At Day 21, Missing |
|
| At Day 21, 0=None |
|
| At Day 21, 1=Mild |
|
| At Day 21, 2=Moderate |
|
| At Day 21, 3=Severe |
|
| At Baseline, 1 |
|
| At Baseline, 2 |
|
| At Baseline, 3 |
|
| At Day 21, Missing |
|
| At Day 21, 0 |
|
| At Day 21, 1 |
|
| At Day 21, 2 |
|
| At Day 21, 3 |
|