Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Decision of investigational team
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective clinical study designed to observe the long-term clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using a patient-specific, posterior stabilized implant in patients with osteoarthritis.
The study is prospective. Subjects will be implanted with an iTotal® PS Knee Replacement System. The study will include a minimum of 100 subjects across up to 10 sites. The patients enrolled in this study may represent the first cases of the iTotal PS KRS implanted at a particular site; data collected for the first 15 patients at each site will be analyzed separately from the rest of the enrolled population. This will provide visibility towards determining if there exists a learning curve in the implantation process of the iTotal PS KRS. The study sites will be located in the United States.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iTotal PS KRS | Device | Total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Baseline from 1-Year in KSS | Change in Knee Society Scores from the pre-operative visit to the 1-year post-operative visit. The Knee Society Score (KSS) includes an Objective Knee Score, Function Score, Satisfaction Score, and Expectation Score. The objective knee score, completed by the surgeon, includes a VAS score of pain walking on level ground and on stairs or inclines, as well as an assessment of alignment, ligament stability, and ROM, along with deductions for flexion contracture or extensor lag. Patients then record their satisfaction, functional activities, and expectations (Scuderi et al., 2012). | 2 Years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in KSS at years 2, 5 and 10 post-implantation | The Knee Society Score includes an Objective Knee Score, Function Score, Satisfaction Score, and Expectation Score. The Knee Society Score (KSS) includes an Objective Knee Score, Function Score, Satisfaction Score, and Expectation Score. The objective knee score, completed by the surgeon, includes a VAS score of pain walking on level ground and on stairs or inclines, as well as an assessment of alignment, ligament stability, and ROM, along with deductions for flexion contracture or extensor lag. Patients then record their satisfaction, functional activities, and expectations (Scuderi et al., 2012). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Revision rates post-implantation | Rate of patients that require a revision of the total knee replacement for any reason. | Collected from the date of implantation to the end of the study. Up to 10 years. |
| Length of procedure: Skin to Skin |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Quartulli | Restor3D | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC Orthopedics | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States | ||
| Texas Institute for Hip & Knee Surgery |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17403800 | Background | Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. | |
| 1959265 | Background | Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):157-64. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Up to 10 years |
| Change from baseline in KOOS at years 1, 2, 5 and 10 post-implantation | The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a 42 question knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. | Up to 10 years |
| Post-operative limb alignment if long leg x-rays available | Comparison of limb alignment between pre-operative and post-operative x-rays. | 2 years |
| Length of hospital stay in hours | How long the patient is in the hospital from the time of admission to the time of discharge. | 1 year |
| Blood loss during surgery | Estimated blood loss during surgery (mL) | 1 year |
| Transfusion rate | Rate of patients who require blood transfusions during surgery | 1 year |
The duration of the knee arthroplasty starting from the time the surgeon makes the first incision and ending when the surgeon sutures the initial incision.
| 1 year |
| Austin |
| Texas |
| 78751 |
| United States |
| Mansfield Orthopaedics | Morrisville | Vermont | 05661 | United States |
| Scott Orthopedic | Huntington | West Virginia | 25702 | United States |
| 17188876 | Background | Fitzpatrick C, FitzPatrick D, Lee J, Auger D. Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee. 2007 Mar;14(2):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22. |
| 19182028 | Background | Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91 Suppl 1:69-76. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01448. |
| 19844772 | Background | Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. |
| 16967035 | Background | Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:35-43. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e. |
| 22045067 | Background | Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):3-19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0. No abstract available. |