Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine the SPF of the test product according to the International Standards Organization (ISO) 24444:2010 methodology (In vivo determination of the SPF).
A single-center, randomized, evaluator blind, intra-individual comparison, no treatment and positive controlled clinical study to determine the SPF of Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light as per ISO 24444:2010. The provisional minimal erythemal dose of unprotected skin (MEDu) for each subject will be determined before starting the test phase. Once the provisional MEDu for a subject has been determined, the three test sites will be demarcated. The test product and positive control (P3 reference sunscreen formulation) will be applied to two of the three test sites. The other test site will remain unprotected. All three test sites will be exposed to UV radiation at the expected MED and subsequently evaluated for erythema 16-24 hours after UV exposure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test product | Experimental | This arm will include all the test sites on the participants back where test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light) will be applied. |
|
| Reference product | Active Comparator | This arm will include all the test sites on the participants back where reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen) will be applied. |
|
| Negative control | No Intervention | This arm will include all the test sites on the participants back which will be left unprotected. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light | Other | Investigator controlled, topical application to the epidermis at a dose of 2 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2). Single application. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic Mean of Individual Sun Protection Factor (SPFi) Value | Arithmetical mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hours after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (SPFi = MEDp/MEDu). The Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) was defined as the lowest dose of UV radiation that produced the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UV exposure, 16 to 24 hours after UV exposure. No inferential statistical analysis has been performed for this outcome. Test and reference products achieved a 95% CI of ±16.4% and ±16.6% of the mean SPF. These data meet the statistical criterion defined in ISO 24444:2010 as the 95% CI is within ±17% of the mean SPF. | Up to 24 hours post UV exposure |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline (for GlaxoSmithKline; Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company; Sirtris, a GSK Company; Stiefel, a GSK Company; ViiV Healthcare) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Schenefeld | Schleswig-Holstein | 22869 | Germany |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All the participants were randomized at one center in Germany.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Participants | There were a total of 4 test sites assigned to each participant: 1) untreated skin for provisional MEDu assessment; 2) untreated skin for SPF assessment; 3) test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light); and 4) reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen). Test sites were delineated on the dorsum between the scapula and waist, either side of the spine. The test and reference products were applied topically to separate test sites by trained technician at a dose of 2 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) as per the randomization schedule. All participants who were randomized to receive the study treatments were included. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Participants | Baseline population included safety population (N=26), safety population included all participants randomized and received any application of the study products.There were a total of 4 test sites assigned to each participant: 1) untreated skin for provisional MEDu assessment; 2) untreated skin for SPF assessment; 3) test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light); and 4) reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen). Test sites were delineated on the dorsum between the scapula and waist, either side of the spine. The test and reference products were applied topically to separate test sites by trained technician at a dose of 2 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) as per the randomization schedule. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Arithmetic Mean of Individual Sun Protection Factor (SPFi) Value | Arithmetical mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hours after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (SPFi = MEDp/MEDu). The Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) was defined as the lowest dose of UV radiation that produced the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UV exposure, 16 to 24 hours after UV exposure. No inferential statistical analysis has been performed for this outcome. Test and reference products achieved a 95% CI of ±16.4% and ±16.6% of the mean SPF. These data meet the statistical criterion defined in ISO 24444:2010 as the 95% CI is within ±17% of the mean SPF. | Intent to treat (ITT, N= 25) all valid participants data with no major protocol deviations were included in the SPF calculations. All participants exposed to Ultra Violet (UV) radiation were included the safety population, irrelevant of whether they successfully complete the study. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Ratio (unit less) | Up to 24 hours post UV exposure |
Approximately 17 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Test Product | This arm included all the test sites on the participants back where test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light) was applied. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 11, 2017 | Jun 5, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 29, 2017 | Jun 5, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The trained grader responsible for assessing Minimal Erythemal Dose of unprotected skin (MEDu) and Minimal Erythemal Dose of product treated (MEDp) at Visit 5 will be blinded to the product allocation of subjects. The trained grader responsible for assessing the provisional MEDu at Visit 3 will, necessarily, not be blinded since only one test site will be exposed to Ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
| ISO 24444:2010 P3 Standard Sunscreen | Other | Investigator controlled, topical application to the epidermis at a dose of 2 mg/cm2. Single application. |
|
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Test Product | This arm included all the test sites on the participants back where test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light) was applied. |
| OG001 | Reference Product | This arm included all the test sites on the participants back where reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen) was applied. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| EG001 | Reference Product | This arm included all the test sites on the participants back where reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen) was applied. | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| EG002 | Negative Control | This arm included all the test sites on the participants back which were left unprotected. | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| EG003 | All Participants | Safety population included all participants randomized and received any application of the study products.There were a total of 4 test sites assigned to each participant: 1) untreated skin for provisional MEDu assessment; 2) untreated skin for SPF assessment; 3) test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light); and 4) reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen). Test sites were delineated on the dorsum between the scapula and waist, either side of the spine. The test and reference products were applied topically to separate test sites by trained technician at a dose of 2 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) as per the randomization schedule. | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.