Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ResearchPoint Global | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a pivotal phase study of up to 120 subjects and 15 clinical sites. All subjects are implanted with the Vivistim System® and then randomized to either study treatment or active-control treatment. The randomization will be stratified by age (<30, >30) and baseline FMA UE (20 to <35; >35 to 50). Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding.
This study has three distinct stages: Stage I, an acute blinded stage, Stage II, an unblinded stage through one year of standard VNS, and Stage III, an unblinded stage for yearly follow-up after one year of VNS. The Control group crosses over to VNS treatment at Stage II.
For Stage I, subjects have:
Stage II:
Stage III:
• After one year of standard VNS therapy (~13.5 months after implant for VNS group subjects and ~18 months after implant for Control group subjects), subjects who wish to keep their device for further use will have annual follow-up assessments until commercial approval.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| VNS + Rehabilitation (1) | Experimental | Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. |
|
| Control VNS | Active Comparator | Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation | Device | Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for difference in average change at 1-day after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (Difference in average change in FM-A from baseline [V4] to one day after therapy [V5]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). | V5, One day after 6-weeks of therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for change in average score at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy (change in average FMA-UE from baseline [V4] to 90 days after therapy [V7]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perseverance Research Center | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85254 | United States | ||
| Rancho Research Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31903435 | Background | Kimberley TJ, Prudente CN, Engineer ND, Pierce D, Tarver B, Cramer SC, Dickie DA, Dawson J. Study protocol for a pivotal randomised study assessing vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitation for improved upper limb motor function after stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):363-377. doi: 10.1177/2396987319855306. Epub 2019 Jun 17. | |
| 24553102 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study recruiting website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | VNS + Rehabilitation (1) | Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 23, 2017 | Apr 12, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Double blind, randomized, parallel study with partial crossover (control subjects crossover to treatment after randomized portion)
Not provided
Not provided
Participants, therapists (care providers), investigators, and outcomes assessors do not know which group (VNS or control VNS) the patients are randomized. Only one person at the site - the programmer who programs the device settings - knows which group the subject is randomized into.
| Rehabilitation | Other | Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke |
|
| V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response is the percent of patients with a 6 point or greater improvement on the (FMA-UE). The percent of patients with the 6-point change is calculated at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (V4). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). | V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
| Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average Change | The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is an assessment scale of upper extremity functional level after stroke. The functional assessment range is an average of 15 sub-items with a range from 0 to 5, with 0 (meaning did not attempt) to 5 (meaning normal). WMFT 90-day - is a measure of the functional assessment change from baseline to 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy. | V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
| Downey |
| California |
| 90242 |
| United States |
| Providence St. John's Medical Center | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| Mayo Jacksonville / Brooks Rehabilitation | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Emory University Medical School | Atlanta | Georgia | 30329 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02129 | United States |
| Spectrum Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| New York Presbyterian Hospital / Weill Cornell Medicine | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Burke Medical Research Institute | White Plains | New York | 10605 | United States |
| Ohio State University - Neuroscience Research Institute | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37240 | United States |
| UT Southwestern | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| TIRR Memorial Hermann (UT Health Science Center at Houston) | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Royal Aberdeen Infirmary | Aberdeen | AB25 2ZB | United Kingdom |
| University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital | Glasgow | G51 4TF | United Kingdom |
| Royal London | London | E15 4LZ | United Kingdom |
| Newcastle (Royal Victoria Infirmary) | Newcastle upon Tyne | NE1 4LP | United Kingdom |
| Royal Hallamshire Hospital | Sheffield | S1 4DA | United Kingdom |
| Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Fayyaz T, Hulsey DR, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):698-706. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521006. Epub 2014 Feb 18. |
| 26645257 | Background | Dawson J, Pierce D, Dixit A, Kimberley TJ, Robertson M, Tarver B, Hilmi O, McLean J, Forbes K, Kilgard MP, Rennaker RL, Cramer SC, Walters M, Engineer N. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):143-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477. Epub 2015 Dec 8. |
| 33894832 | Result | Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Dixit A, Alexander J, Ali R, Brown BL, Feng W, DeMark L, Hochberg LR, Kautz SA, Majid A, O'Dell MW, Pierce D, Prudente CN, Redgrave J, Turner DL, Engineer ND, Kimberley TJ. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1545-1553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X. |
| 40329913 | Derived | Kimberley TJ, Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Liu C, Gochyyev P, Dawson J; VNS-REHAB Trial Group. Long-Term Outcomes of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke. Stroke. 2025 Aug;56(8):2255-2265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.050479. Epub 2025 May 7. |
| 38836606 | Derived | Lin S, Rodriguez CO, Wolf SL. Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper Extremity Rehabilitation for Chronic Ischemic Stroke: Contribution of Dosage Parameters. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Aug;38(8):607-615. doi: 10.1177/15459683241258769. Epub 2024 Jun 5. |
| 38815953 | Derived | Vora I, Gochyyev P, Engineer N, Wolf SL, Kimberley TJ. Distal Versus Proximal Arm Improvement After Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy After Chronic Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep;105(9):1709-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.018. Epub 2024 May 28. |
| Control VNS |
Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | VNS + Rehabilitation (1) | Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke |
| BG001 | Control VNS | Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| FMA-UE Baseline Score | The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). The study allowed entry on the FMA-UE between 20 and 50. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||||
| WMFT Baseline Score | The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is an assessment scale of upper extremity functional level after stroke. The functional assessment range is an average of 15 sub-items with a range from 0 to 5, with 0 (meaning did not attempt) to 5 (meaning normal). | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for difference in average change at 1-day after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (Difference in average change in FM-A from baseline [V4] to one day after therapy [V5]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | V5, One day after 6-weeks of therapy |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for change in average score at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy (change in average FMA-UE from baseline [V4] to 90 days after therapy [V7]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response is the percent of patients with a 6 point or greater improvement on the (FMA-UE). The percent of patients with the 6-point change is calculated at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (V4). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average Change | The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is an assessment scale of upper extremity functional level after stroke. The functional assessment range is an average of 15 sub-items with a range from 0 to 5, with 0 (meaning did not attempt) to 5 (meaning normal). WMFT 90-day - is a measure of the functional assessment change from baseline to 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy |
|
|
Adverse events were collected over the course of the randomized study (enrollment, 4-week baseline, implant, 2-week recover, 6-week therapy, 90-day follow-up) and reported here.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | VNS + Rehabilitation (1) | Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke | 0 | 53 | 5 | 53 | 43 | 53 |
| EG001 | Control VNS | Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke | 0 | 55 | 3 | 55 | 42 | 55 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Patient with history of seizures had one during the 5th week of study treatment. Admitted to the ICU, recovered, was discharged, and continued in the study. The device implant and device stimulation are not related to this event (patient history). |
|
| Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)/ chronic kidney disease (CKD) | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | The patient was hospitalized after 7-8 months of worsening swelling and dyspnea on exertion (pre study). Found to have acute onset kidney injury (AKI on Chronic Kidney Disease [CKD]). Patient recovered and continued. Not related to implant or stim. |
|
| Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject hospitalized with urinary tract infection. Subject recovered and continued in the study. No relationship to implant surgery or stimulation. |
|
| Dysphonia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject experienced vocal cord paresis and dysphonia after surgery. Recovered over 5 weeks; laryngoscope confirmed complete recovery. Related to the implant procedure but not stimulation. Subject recovered and continued in the study. |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | 1 Subject fell at home walking down steps; fractured two vertebrae. 1 Subject fell at hospital during testing. 1 subject fell at home and broke her humerus. Subjects missed visits but continued in the study. No relationship to surgery or therapy. |
|
| Colinic Diverticular Abscess | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject reported pain and achiness at home. ER assessment indicated CDA. CDA drained and antibiotics started; subject returned home and recovered. No relationship to device implant or stimulation. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coughing/Hoarseness | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Low Mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bruise | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Local Throat Irritation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (22.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | MicroTransponder Inc. | 8556289375 | studies@microtransponder.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 30, 2018 | Apr 12, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D010291 | Paresis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|