Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective: Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF) is activated with titanium, which results in a more mature and aggregated form than PRF. In our previous studies, we established that the fibrin carpet formed with titanium had a firmer network structure, and longer resorption time in the tissue than the fibrin carpet formed with glass. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the effects of autogenous T-PRF and CTG.
Materials and methods: A total 114 Miller Class I/II gingival recessions with abrasion defects will be treated either T-PRF (63 teeth) or CTG (51 teeth) using a modified tunnel technique. Clinical periodontal indexes, keratinized tissue (KTW), gingival thickness (GT) and recession depth (RD) will be recorded before surgery and at 6 and 12-month follow-up examinations. The Visual Analog Scale and healing index scores will be assessed.
A total of 34 patients will be informed in detail about the risks and benefits of each step of the study, and their signed consents will be obtained.
These clinical assessments will be done:
VAS Assessment On the postoperative Day 1, 3 and 7, the patients will be asked to complete a chart where they can rate subjective complaints of pain, burning sensation and discomfort in the surgery site between 0 (none) and 100 (very severe).
Wound Healing Index While removing the sutures two weeks after surgery, the physician will evaluate wound healing according to the Huang criteria separately for each tooth; Score 1: Problem-free wound healing without gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, or dehiscence of the flap margins.
Score 2. Problem-free wound healing with mild gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort and flap dehiscence without suppuration.
Score 3. Poor wound healing with severe gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort and flap dehiscence.
Calculation of Root Surface Coverage Ratio This ratio is presented as percentage (%) and evaluated in the 6th and 12th months.
Preoperative recession depth - Postoperative recession depth X 100 % Preoperative recession depth
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Root Coverage Surgery with T-PRF | Experimental | Multiple gingival recessions were treated by Titanium prepared PRF (T-PRF) in 16 patients. The T-PRF membrane that was procured was placed in the defect area 1 mm beyond the enamel-cement border.. The T-PRF was fixed in the receiver area by a mattress stitch through the apical aspect using 5-0 monofilament absorbable sutures. The flap was stitched in a manner that completely covered the graft in the coronal aspect. Thereafter, the graft was fixed to the flap on the coronal aspect with horizontal mattress sutures. Compression was applied to the receiver area with serum-impregnated sterile gauze for approximately 5 minutes, and then periodontal paste was placed onto the surgery site. |
|
| Root Coverage Surgery with CTG | Active Comparator | Multiple gingival recessions were treated by Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)in 18 patients.The CTG width was measured to include 1 mm beyond the root surface defects in the receiver area. Following anaesthesia of the palate, the borders of the start and finish incisions were marked. Subepithelial connective tissue that was 1.5-2 mm thick and excluded the periosteum was removed and maintained in physiological saline. The palate was stitched with 4-0 absorbable sutures (Pegalak, DoÄŸsan, Turkey) and covered with a periodontal paste. Before placing the connective tissue in the receiver area, the fat and glandular tissues and the band-shaped epithelium on the connective tissue were removed using scissors. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root Coverage Surgery with T-PRF | Procedure | Root surfaces in the multiple gingival recession regions were made smooth using Gracey curettes. To remove the smear layer, 24% EDTA solution was applied to the tooth surfaces for approximately 2 minutes and then washed with physiological saline. The receiver region was prepared using the modified tunnel method. After passive stabilization of the flap in the coronal aspect, the preparation of the donor region was initiated |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Root Coverage Percentage at 12 months | Preoperative recession depth - Postoperative recession depth X 100 % Preoperative recession depth | Change from baseline Root Coverage Percentage at 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Keratinized Tissue Width at 12 months | The distance between gingival margin to mucogingival junction | Change from baseline Keratinized Tissue Width at 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Eligibility criteria included the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Esra Ercan | Karadeniz Technical University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esra Ercan | Trabzon | Others | 61080 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
In this randomized controlled clinical trial, multiple gingival recessions were treated by T-PRF in 16 patients and by CTG in 18 patients selected by the coin-toss method. All surgical procedures, measurements and follow-up were performed by the same clinician
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Root Coverage Surgery with CTG | Procedure | Root surfaces in the multiple gingival recession regions were made smooth using Gracey curettes. To remove the smear layer, 24% EDTA solution was applied to the tooth surfaces for approximately 2 minutes and then washed with physiological saline. The receiver region was prepared using the modified tunnel method. After passive stabilization of the flap in the coronal aspect, the preparation of the donor region was initiated |
|
| D055093 |
| Periodontal Atrophy |