Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For effective drug delivery using inhalation route, it is important to use the inhalers correctly. This open-label study will evaluate the error rates during the use of ELLIPTA DPI, alone or in combination, in comparison with other DPIs. The study aims to provide clinical evidence in subjects with COPD that the reduced number of steps required to use the ELLIPTA DPI could result in fewer errors made by subjects, and therefore a more consistent treatment. Approximately 450 subjects prescribed with either of RELVAR® ELLIPTA, ANORO® ELLIPTA, INCRUSE® ELLIPTA, SYMBICORT® TURBUHALER®, SERETIDE® DISKUS®, SPIRIVA® HANDIHALER®, ULTIBRO® BREEZHALER® or SEEBRI® BREEZHALER will be included in the study and will have 2 clinical visits. At Visit 1, subjects will take their maintenance DPIs and the critical and overall errors made by subjects will be assessed. After the assessment, subjects will be instructed on correct use or informed of their correct use of their DPIs. The total duration of the study is approximately 6 weeks. ELLIPTA, SERETIDE and DISKUS are registered trademarks of the GSK group of companies. SYMBICORT and TURBUHALER are registered trademarks of the AstraZeneca group of companies. SPIRIVA and HANDIHALER are registered trademarks of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. ULTIBRO, BREEZHALER and SEEBRI are registered trademarks of the Novartis group of companies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects using RELVAR ELLIPTA | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroids/ long-acting beta agonists (ICS/LABA) via a single DPI of RELVAR ELLIPTA for treatment of COPD will be included. |
| |
| Subjects using SYMBICORT TURBUHALER | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via a single DPI of SYMBICORT TURBUHALER for treatment of COPD will be included. |
| |
| Subjects using SERETIDE DISKUS | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via a single DPI of SERETIDE DISKUS for treatment of COPD will be included. |
| |
| Subjects using SPIRIVA HANDIHALER | Subjects with a fixed dose monotherapy of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) via a single DPI of SPIRIVA HANDIHALER for treatment of COPD will be included. |
| |
| Subjects using INCRUSE ELLIPTA or ANORO ELLIPTA | Subjects with a fixed dose monotherapy of LAMA via a single DPI of INCRUSE ELLIPTA or subjects taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of ANORO ELLIPTA for treatment of COPD will be included. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relvar ELLIPTA | Device | ELLIPTA inhaler containing Relvar will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the health care practitioner (HCP) in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in patient instruction leaflets (PILs) for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The analysis was performed on the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population which comprised of all enrolled participants who demonstrated use of their primary DPI. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and reporting and analysis plan (RAP). | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in the primary DPI is presented. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and uses a dry powder inhaler
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Beek | 6191JW | Netherlands | |||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32606640 | Background | Collier DJ, Wielders P, van der Palen J, Heyes L, Midwinter D, Collison K, Preece A, Barnes N, Sharma R. Critical Error Frequency and the Impact of Training with Inhalers Commonly used for Maintenance Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 9;15:1301-1313. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S224209. eCollection 2020. |
Not provided
Not provided
IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (copy the URL below to your browser)
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
A total of 461 participants were screened of which 11 failed screening and 450 participants were enrolled. The study was conducted in two countries-Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
This was an open-label study investigating error rates for ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler (DPI), alone or in combination when compared to other DPIs (DISKUS, Turbuhaler, HandiHaler and Breezhaler) and combinations of these, as prescribed to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participants, prior to any retraining in correct use.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Relvar Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) via Relvar Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Relvar Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of Ellipta DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Relvar Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 24, 2017 | Jan 14, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Subjects using SEEBRI BREEZHALER or ULTIBRO BREEZHALER | Subjects with a fixed dose monotherapy of LAMA via a single DPI of SEEBRI BREEZHALER or subjects taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of ULTIBRO BREEZHALER for treatment of COPD will be included. |
|
| Subjects using RELVAR ELLIPTA with HANDIHALER/ INCRUSE ELLIPTA | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via RELVAR ELLIPTA along with a fixed dose of LAMA via SPIRIVA HANDIHALER or INCRUSE ELLIPTA will be included. |
|
| Subjects using TURBUHALER with HANDIHALER/INCRUSE ELLIPTA | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via SYMBICORT TURBUHALER along with a fixed dose of LAMA via SPIRIVA HANDIHALER or INCRUSE ELLIPTA will be included. |
|
| Subjects using DISKUS with HANDIHALER/INCRUSE ELLIPTA | Subjects with a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via SERETIDE DISKUS along with a fixed dose of LAMA via SPIRIVA HANDIHALER or INCRUSE ELLIPTA will be included. |
|
| Symbicort TURBUHALER | Device | TURBUHALER inhaler containing Symbicort will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Seretide DISKUS | Device | DISKUS inhaler containing Seretide will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Spiriva HANDIHALER | Device | HANDIHALER inhaler containing Spiriva will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| BREEZHALER | Device | BREEZHALER inhaler containing either Seebri or Ultibro will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Incruse ELLIPTA | Device | ELLIPTA inhaler containing Incruse will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Anoro ELLIPTA | Device | ELLIPTA inhaler containing Anoro will be used by subjects as their maintenance treatment to control COPD. |
|
| Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented.The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Day 1 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in the primary DPI is presented. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. . | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as critical, when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | Week 6 |
| Beek en Donk |
| 5741 CG |
| Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Eindhoven | 5623 EJ | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hengelo | 7555 DL | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hoorn | 1624 NP | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kloosterhaar | 7694 AC | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nijverdal | 7442 LS | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rotterdam | 3051 GV | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zutphen | 7207 AE | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Northwood | Middlesex | HA6 2RN | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | London | EC1M 6BQ | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | London | SW17 0QT | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sidcup, Kent | DA14 6LT | United Kingdom |
| FG001 | Symbicort Turbuhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Symbicort Turbuhaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Turbuhaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Symbicort Turbuhaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| FG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Relvar Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) via Relvar Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Relvar Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of Ellipta DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Relvar Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG001 | Symbicort Turbuhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Symbicort Turbuhaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Turbuhaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Symbicort Turbuhaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| BG009 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the health care practitioner (HCP) in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in patient instruction leaflets (PILs) for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The analysis was performed on the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population which comprised of all enrolled participants who demonstrated use of their primary DPI. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and reporting and analysis plan (RAP). | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in the primary DPI is presented. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants with at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 1-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 1 and any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented.The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Day 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in the primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Critical Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose. The percentage of participants making at least one critical error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one critical error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Primary Device Comparisons | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in the primary DPI is presented. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2 in Primary DPI (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in primary DPI is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. . | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus Relvar Ellipta With Any Other LAMA) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta DPI Versus All ICS/LABA DPIs With a LAMA Second DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. Errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as critical, when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. Percentage of participants making at least one overall error in either one or both devices (where applicable) is presented. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta versus all ICS/LABA+LAMA DPIs; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Making at Least One Overall Error at Visit 2-Dual Device Comparisons (Relvar Ellipta With or Without a LAMA DPI) Versus Any Other ICS/LABA DPI With or Without a LAMA DPI) | Participants were asked to demonstrate use of their prescribed DPI at Visit 2 within 6 weeks after they were retrained on the correct use of inhalers. Any error made by the participant was recorded by the HCP in the checklist. Checklist of instructions for correct use were based on the steps for correct use listed in PILs for the respective DPI. The errors made during demonstration by participants were defined as "critical", when the participant received a lesser/no dose and non-critical when the dose may not be affected, but the participant has demonstrated improper use of their DPI, as per the PIL. Overall errors is the combination of critical and non-critical errors. The aim of the analysis was to compare percentage of participants making at least one overall error with Ellipta and Ellipta+LAMA versus Turbuhaler and Turbuhaler+LAMA and Diskus and Diskus+LAMA; hence, the arms were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and RAP. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at Visit 2 were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 6 |
|
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-SAEs were collected until completion of the study (Up to Week 6)
SAEs and non-SAEs were collected in the ITT Population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Relvar Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) via Relvar Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Relvar Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of Ellipta DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Relvar Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 4 | 50 |
| EG001 | Symbicort Turbuhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Symbicort Turbuhaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Turbuhaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Symbicort Turbuhaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 50 |
| EG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
| EG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 50 |
| EG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 51 | 1 | 51 | 2 | 51 |
| EG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 49 | 1 | 49 | 2 | 49 |
| EG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 50 |
| EG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 1 | 50 | 3 | 50 |
| EG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 5 | 50 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic obstructive | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 26, 2018 | Jan 14, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian-Central/South Asian Heritage |
|
| Asian-East Asian Heritage |
|
| Asian-Japanese Heritage |
|
| Asian-South East Asian Heritage |
|
| White-Arabic/North African Heritage |
|
| White-White/Caucasian/European Heritage |
|
| Regression, Logistic |
| 0.114 |
Analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect and adjusting for the covariate of time on current primary DPI. |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 2.478 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.805 |
| 7.632 |
Odds ratio was calculated considering Relvar Ellipta as comparator. |
| Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.026 | Analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect and adjusting for the covariate of time on current primary DPI. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 3.499 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.160 | 10.555 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Incruse/Anoro Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.012 | Analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect and adjusting for the covariate of time on current primary DPI. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 3.943 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.348 | 11.534 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Incruse/Anoro Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.746 | Analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect and adjusting for the covariate of time on current primary DPI. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.223 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.361 | 4.151 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Relvar Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.001 | Sensitivity analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect. Time on current primary device was removed from the model for this sensitivity analysis as it was confounded with primary device/treatment cohort. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 5.562 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.932 | 16.013 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Relvar Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.050 | Sensitivity analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect. Time on current primary device was removed from the model for this sensitivity analysis as it was confounded with primary device/treatment cohort. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 2.979 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.999 | 8.882 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Relvar Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.006 | Sensitivity analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect. Time on current primary device was removed from the model for this sensitivity analysis as it was confounded with primary device/treatment cohort. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 4.418 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.521 | 12.834 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Incruse/Anoro Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.009 | Sensitivity analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect. Time on current primary device was removed from the model for this sensitivity analysis as it was confounded with primary device/treatment cohort. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 4.165 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.425 | 12.178 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Incruse/Anoro Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
| Regression, Logistic | 0.761 | Sensitivity analysis was performed using logistic regression with treatment cohort as fixed effect. Time on current primary device was removed from the model for this sensitivity analysis as it was confounded with primary device/treatment cohort. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.209 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.357 | 4.095 | Odds ratio was calculated considering Relvar Ellipta as comparator. | Superiority |
|
|
|
| Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] |
All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All participants from Relvar Ellipta+LAMA, Symbicort Turbuhaler (Symb Turb)+LAMA, and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
| OG002 |
| Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] |
All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2.
|
|
|
| OG001 | [Relvar Ellipta+LAMA]+[Symb Turb+LAMA]+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Relvar Ellipta+LAMA, Symbicort Turbuhaler (Symb Turb)+LAMA, and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
All participants from Symbicort Turbuhaler and Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA arms were included.
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| [Relvar Ellipta+LAMA]+[Symb Turb+LAMA]+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] |
All participants from Relvar Ellipta+LAMA, Symbicort Turbuhaler (Symb Turb)+LAMA, and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Symbicort Turbuhaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Turbuhaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Symbicort Turbuhaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Seretide Diskus prior to retraining on the correct use of Diskus at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Seretide Diskus within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG003 | Spiriva Handihaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via Spiriva Handihaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Spiriva Handihaler prior to retraining on the correct use of Handihaler at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Spiriva Handihaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG004 | Incruse/Anoro Ellipta | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Incruse Ellipta or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via Anoro Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Incruse/Anoro Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Incruse/Anoro Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG005 | Ultibro/Seebri Breezhaler | Participants prescribed a fixed dose of LAMA via Seebri Breezehaler or participants taking a fixed dose combination of LAMA/LABA via a single DPI of Ultibro Breezehaler for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Ultibro/Seebri Breezehaler within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG006 | Relvar Ellipta+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG007 | Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Symbicort Turbuhaler along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
| OG008 | Seretide Diskus+LAMA | Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Seretide Diskus along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
|
|
|
Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) via Relvar Ellipta for treatment of COPD were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using Relvar Ellipta prior to retraining on the correct use of Ellipta DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of Relvar Ellipta within 6 weeks at Visit 2.
|
|
|
All participants from Symbicort Turbuhaler and Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA arms were included. |
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
| Relvar Ellipta+LAMA |
Participants prescribed a fixed dose combination of ICS/LABA via Relvar Ellipta along with a fixed dose of LAMA via Spiriva Handihaler or Incruse Ellipta were included. Participants were assessed for errors while using combination DPI prior to retraining on the correct use of DPI at Visit 1 (Day 1). The participants were retrained on inhaler use following which they were reassessed for errors during use of combination DPI within 6 weeks at Visit 2. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | [Relvar Ellipta+LAMA]+[Symb Turb+LAMA]+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Relvar Ellipta+LAMA, Symbicort Turbuhaler (Symb Turb)+LAMA, and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|
All participants from Symbicort Turbuhaler and Symbicort Turbuhaler+LAMA arms were included.
| OG002 | Seretide Diskus+[Seretide Diskus+LAMA] | All participants from Seretide Diskus and Seretide Diskus+LAMA arms were included. |
|
|
|