Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A randomized controlled trial that aimed at studying the values (if any) of subcutaneous drains use in lean women during Cesarean section.
Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common operative procedures performed in modern obstetrics. Despite being that, common, surgical techniques and steps do widely vary. These variations depend on many factors including surgeons preferences, patient s characteristics and available facilities and circumstances .
The most common complications of Cesarean section are superficial surgical site complications including sepsis, seroma formation and breakdown.
One of the common, yet debatable, practices in Cesarean section is to use a subcutaneous drain for the wound .The advantage of such a practice is to drain any blood or serous fluid that may accumulate in the subcutaneous space, which cause post-operative pain or provide a good medium for microbial growth and infection.
Thus, it is assumed that drains can reduce the burden of surgical site infection. Some surgeons, however, have raised much argument about the value of subcutaneous drains and emerging evidence raised concerns about its effectiveness. Despite this, it is evident that it is still widely used in the clinical practice.
Most randomized controlled trials on this issue, from which we draw the current evidence, were conducted in the developed countries, mainly the United States, with readily available facilities and optimum level of care. This fact raises concerns about how this evidence can be applicable in developing countries with weak health care systems and low level of awareness. In addition, Cesarean section rates are greatly higher in developing countries due to its abuse, which emphasize how the current evidence can't be applicable and in need for further updates .
The current gap between the current practice and lack of evidence has to be filled. In this study, investigators aim at providing answers for this critical issue, thus investigators can ensure women's health and provide the best quality of care following Cesarean section.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Experimental | Patients for whom a subcutaneous drain was used |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | No drain group |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous Drain | Procedure | A closed drainage system for the subcutaneous tissue was used (Redivac) through a separate stab wound. Drains were left in place for 24 h or until drainage was less than 50 ml. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of superficial surgical site infection | rate of superficial surgical site infection, defined as presence of wound discharge that yielded a positive result on bacteriological culture within 72 hours after the operation | within 72 hours after the operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound seroma | A seroma is a pocket of clear serous fluid that sometimes develops in the body after surgery | up to 6 weeks postoperative |
| Superficial wound breakdown | superficial wound breakdown (defined as skin and/or subcutaneous dehiscence with intact fascial layer) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1. All females with previous cesarean sections admitted to Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Menoufia University Hospitals either for elective or urgent cesarean section will be considered eligible.
Exclusion Criteria: In order to control any confounding variables, we will exclude women with an added risk of wound complications. Those will include:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| HAITHAM A HAMZA, MD | Menoufia University - Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Ibrahim A Seif El Nasr, MD | Menoufia University - Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Nabih I Elkhouly, MD | Menoufia University - Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Faculty of Medicine - Menoufia University | Shibīn al Kawm | EL Menofia | 32651 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11961377 | Background | Al-Inany H, Youssef G, Abd ElMaguid A, Abdel Hamid M, Naguib A. Value of subcutaneous drainage system in obese females undergoing cesarean section using pfannenstiel incision. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53(2):75-8. doi: 10.1159/000052996. | |
| 24338262 | Background | Gates S, Anderson ER. Wound drainage for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 13;2013(12):CD004549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004549.pub3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| up to 6 weeks postoperative |
| Postoperative fever | temperature 38 C, 24 hours postoperatively | 24 hours postoperatively |
| Postoperative pain | through visual analogue scale (VAS); with 0 meaning no pain, and 10 meaning the worst pain | after 24 hours postoperative |