Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDICATE - DZHK 6 | Other Identifier | Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) | OTHER |
| The German Heart Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized controlled, multi-center trial randomizing patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low to intermediate operative risk of mortality in a 1:1 fashion to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to test, whether TAVI is non-inferior to SAVR, as measured by all-cause mortality or stroke after 1 and 5 years.
A paradigm-shift towards performing TAVI in intermediate- and low-risk patients has already begun, as procedural results of TAVI have improved significantly within the past years. Nevertheless, a prospective and independent comparison of surgical (SAVR) and interventional (TAVI) valve therapy in patients considered at low to intermediate risk that covers an "all-comers" patient population and multiple devices has not yet been performed.
The DEDICATE-trial is designed as a prospectively randomized (1:1), multi-center, comparator-controlled interventional trial to investigate whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is non-inferior - as measured by all-cause mortality or stroke after 1 and 5 years - compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low to intermediate operative risk of mortality, as assessed by the local Heart Team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter aortic valve implantation | Experimental | Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the most appropriate CE (Conformité Européene)-marked device available, with a minimum demand of experience of 30 implanted devices/type per center. |
|
| Surgical aortic valve replacement | Active Comparator | Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with free choice of surgical bioprosthesis and free choice of surgical access according to the surgeon's preference. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter aortic valve implantation | Device | (TAVI) |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom from stroke or death | (Efficacy endpoint) | within 5 years after randomization |
| Freedom from stroke or death | (Safety endpoint) | within 1 year after randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom from stroke or death | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Overall survival | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Heart team consensus that TAVI and SAVR are both medically justified and advisable based on:
Degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiographically derived criteria:
Patient is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis
Patient is classified as low to intermediate operative risk as assessed by the local heart team according to the variables outlined in the 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of valvular heart disease, taking into account cardiac and extracardiac Patient characteristics and established risk scores (e.g. STS-PROM, EuroSCORE).
A transfemoral or alternative (e.g. transapical, transaortic, transaxillary) access for TAVI seems feasible. Centers should follow a "transfemoral first" strategy for the primary route of access; however, other routes of access are also allowed, as decided by local heart team consensus.
Patient has provided written informed consent to participate in the trial.
Ability of the patient to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in the study, before performing any study related procedures.
The patient agrees to undergo SAVR, if randomized to control treatment.
The patient and the treating physician agree that the patient will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Patients aged 65 to 85 years.
Male patients or females who are postmenopausal defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stefan Blankenberg, MD | Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg (UHZ), Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Jochen Cremer, MD | Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg (UHZ) | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 20251 | Germany | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37655862 | Background | Seiffert M, Vonthein R, Baumgartner H, Borger MA, Choi YH, Falk V, Frey N, Hagendorff A, Hagl C, Hamm C, Konig IR, Landmesser U, Massberg S, Reichenspurner H, Thiele H, Twerenbold R, Vens M, Walther T, Ziegler A, Cremer J, Blankenberg S. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk: rationale and design of the randomised DEDICATE Trial. EuroIntervention. 2023 Oct 23;19(8):652-658. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00232. | |
| 38588025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Surgical aortic valve replacement |
| Procedure |
(SAVR) |
|
| Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from cardiovascular mortality | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from the composite of all-cause mortality and stroke | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from myocardial infarction | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from stroke | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from major or life-threatening / disabling bleeding | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from acute kidney injury | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from vascular access site and access-related complications | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from conduction disturbances and arrhythmias, need for permanent pacemaker implantation | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from residual aortic regurgitation ≥ moderate | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Composite device success | Number of participants with freedom from procedural mortality and correct positioning of a single transcatheter heart valve (THV) in the proper position with intended performance (no prosthesis- patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or peak velocity <3 m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation) | Five years after last patient in |
| Composite early safety | Number of participants dying and/or number of participants with stroke (disabling and non-disabling), and/or life-threatening bleeding and/or acute kidney injury stages 2/3 and/or coronary artery obstruction requiring Intervention and/or major vascular complication and/or valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure. | within first 30 days after procedure |
| Composite clinical efficacy | Number or participants dying and/or number of participants with stroke (disabling and non-disabling) and/or rehospitalisation for worsening heart failure or valve-related symptoms and/or New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) III or IV and/or valve-related dysfunction (mean aortic valve gradient >20 mmHg, effective orifice area (EOA) <0.9-1.1 cm2 and/or Doppler Velocity Index (DVI) <0. 35 m/s, AND/OR moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation) | within first 30 days after procedure |
| Freedom from prosthetic valve dysfunction | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis | will be assessed at every study visit and compared between TAVI and SAVR groups | Five years after last patient in |
| Freedom from the composite time-related valve safety | Number of participants with structural valve deterioration (including repeat procedures, prosthetic valve endocarditis and/or thrombosis) and/or number of participants with thromboembolic events (stroke) and/or Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) bleeding (unless clearly unrelated to valve therapy). | Five years after last patient in |
| Quality of life measures | Number of participants with reduced quality of life measures after valve replacement as compared to baseline levels prior to valve-replacement, assessed using EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire and/or Barthel Index and/or center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) Scale. | Five years after last patient in |
| Health economic analysis | Incremental cost-effectiveness of TAVI compared to surgical valve replacement, by using quality adjusted life years (QALYs). | Five years after last patient in |
| Number of (re) hospitalisations | Number rehospitalisations of all participants. Length of stay in hospital | Five years after last patient in |
| Uniklinik Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen |
| Aachen |
| Germany |
| Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen | Bad Krozingen | Germany |
| Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim | Bad Nauheim | Germany |
| Herz- und Gefässklinik Bad Neustadt/Saale | Bad Neustadt an der Saale | Germany |
| Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Bad Oeynhausen | Bad Oeynhausen | Germany |
| Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Benjamin-Franklin) | Berlin | Germany |
| Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Mitte) | Berlin | Germany |
| Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Virchow) | Berlin | Germany |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Vivantes Friedrichshain | Berlin | Germany |
| Vivantes Humboldt Kliniken | Berlin | Germany |
| Vivantes Klinikum am Urban | Berlin | Germany |
| Vivantes Neukölln | Berlin | Germany |
| Immanuel Klinikum Bernau | Bernau | 16321 | Germany |
| Kliniken der Ruhr-Universität Bochum | Bochum | Germany |
| Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane | Brandenburg an der Havel | Germany |
| Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln | Cologne | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Dresden an der Technischen Universität Dresden | Dresden | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf | Düsseldorf | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinikum für Kardiologie und Angiologie am Westdeutschen Herz- und Gefäßzentrum | Essen | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt | Frankfurt | Germany |
| Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen | Freiburg im Breisgau | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg | Giessen | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Göttingen | Göttingen | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) | Halle | Germany |
| Medizinische Hochschule Hannover | Hanover | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Jena | Jena | Germany |
| Universitätsmedizin Greifswald / Klinikum Karlsburg | Karlsburg | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein | Kiel | Germany |
| Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz | Koblenz | 56076 | Germany |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum Leipzig | Leipzig | Germany |
| Universitäres Herzzentrum Lübeck | Lübeck | Germany |
| Otto-von Guericke-Universität Magdeburg | Magdeburg | Germany |
| Universitätsmedizin Mainz | Mainz | Germany |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum München | München | Germany |
| LMU Klinikum der Universität München | München | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Regensburg | Regensburg | Germany |
| Robert Bosch Krankenhaus | Stuttgart | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Ulm | Ulm | Germany |
| Background |
| Blankenberg S, Seiffert M, Vonthein R, Baumgartner H, Bleiziffer S, Borger MA, Choi YH, Clemmensen P, Cremer J, Czerny M, Diercks N, Eitel I, Ensminger S, Frank D, Frey N, Hagendorff A, Hagl C, Hamm C, Kappert U, Karck M, Kim WK, Konig IR, Krane M, Landmesser U, Linke A, Maier LS, Massberg S, Neumann FJ, Reichenspurner H, Rudolph TK, Schmid C, Thiele H, Twerenbold R, Walther T, Westermann D, Xhepa E, Ziegler A, Falk V; DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial Investigators. Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment of Aortic-Valve Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2024 May 2;390(17):1572-1583. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400685. Epub 2024 Apr 8. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014694 | Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065467 | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019918 | Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation |
| D006348 | Cardiac Surgical Procedures |
| D013504 | Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019919 | Prosthesis Implantation |
| D019616 | Thoracic Surgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided