Evaluation of Zimmer® iASSIST™ vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographic, Clinical and Economic Outcomes
Evaluation of Zimmer® iASSIST™ vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographic, Clinical and Economic Outcomes
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate Zimmer® iASSIST™ with respect to radiographic, clinical and economic outcomes and compared to conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty (NexGen or Persona knee implants).
The study design is a prospective, multicenter, comparative outcome study. The study requires each site to obtain IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval prior to study enrollment. All potential study subjects will be required to participate in the Informed Consent Process.
All study subjects will undergo preoperative clinical evaluations prior to their total knee arthroplasty. Investigators will collect clinical data for 12 months. Follow-up clinical visits include 3 and 12 months post-operatively.
The primary endpoint of this study is defined as component alignment as determined using long leg X-Rays. The secondary endpoint will be to evaluate the Knee Society Score, EQ-5D (EuroQol-5Dimensions) scoring system, operating room time, blood loss and complications
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient is male or female
Patient needs a primary total knee replacement using the NexGen LPS Flex or Persona knee implant
Patient is diagnosed with non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (e.g., osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, etc.)
Patient is over 18 years old
Patient is able to:
Patient meets an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free of or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological or other conditions that would pose excessive operative risk.
Patient has a presence of varus or valgus deformity of 15 degrees or less.
Exclusion Criteria: