Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R21NS094988 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Record erroneously created as an updated trial was initiated & performed in the same patient population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose: To investigate whether rhythmic direct electrical stimulation (DES) causes entrainment of endogenous neural oscillatory activity and whether such activity improve cognition.
Participants: Drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing epilepsy surgery cortical mapping with continuous electrocorticography (ECoG) with intracranial electrodes.
Procedures (methods): Rhythmic electrical stimulation will be delivered via intracranial electrodes during routine extra-operative cortical mapping. Long-term ECoG, Pre-stimulation ECoG, peri-stimulation ECoG, and post-stimulation ECoG data will be analyzed to assess for entrainment of neural oscillations.
The aim of this study is to characterize the entrainment of endogenous neural oscillatory activity using direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the brain and understand the effects on cognition.
In this study, the investigators will apply rhythmic DES to patients who are undergoing routine DES for cortical mapping as a part of their epilepsy surgery evaluation with the aim of entraining cortical neural oscillations at specific frequencies relevant to cognitive processing and neuropsychiatric disease. The investigators hypothesize that rhythmic DES within a naturally occurring oscillatory frequency will cause entrainment at that frequency (e.g. 10Hz rhythmic DES will entrain a 10 Hz alpha oscillation). Also, the investigators posit that rhythmic DES at the theta (5Hz), alpha(10Hz), and gamma (50Hz) frequencies will cause enhancement of neural oscillations in the gamma band.
The study follows a within-participant crossover design. Participants will perform one of the tasks described below and each task consists of multiple trials of varying difficulty. Stimulation will be applied concurrently through electrodes implanted for clinical determination of seizure focus. Equal number of stimulation and sham trials will be pseudo-randomly interleaved to get a balanced design (balanced across trial difficulty and trial type).
The investigators will apply electrical stimulation in the form of pulse trains. The applied electrical stimulation intensity, duration and frequency follow the parameters used for clinical assessments of language and seizure focus and fall below the clinically approved limits.
The investigators will measure participants performance on a simple working memory task during the above-described cortical electrical stimulation protocol. Alternately, participants can perform a face recognition task.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | Sham Comparator | Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham. Trials in which stimulation is not applied. These trials are initiated using a generic trigger generator. |
|
| Stimulation | Active Comparator | Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation. 150 stimulations with stimulations lasting 5 seconds at different target electrodes at two target frequencies (e.g. 5 Hz and 10 Hz) 2 milliampere in amplitude (Pulse shape - Biphasic square pulse 200 microsecond in duration per phase). Stimulation will be applied concurrently with the task and stimulation trials will be randomly interleaved with sham trials. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Cortical Stimulation | Device | A train of periodic electrical pulses is delivered between two local electrodes implanted in the brain |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Working Memory Task Performance - Accuracy | In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Accuracy will be quantified in percentage correct. | 1 Hour |
| Working Memory Task Performance - Reaction Time | In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Reaction times will be quantified in milliseconds. | 1 Hour |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intracranial EEG | Spectral analysis and functional connectivity analysis of electrophysiology data will be performed using methods like multi-taper fft, wavelets, phase locking, Granger causality etc. The measures will be compared between sham and stimulation trials to identify if stimulation enhances neuronal entrainment. The correlation between the measures described above and the task performance will also be estimated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Facial Recognition Task Performance - Accuracy | Participants who consent will be administered this task. On a given trial, participants will be presented with images of two faces side-by-side. The faces will either match in terms of emotion category (e.g., 2 anger faces) or not (e.g., an anger face and a fear face). Faces presented together will always be of the same gender but different identities. Participants will be asked to determine whether the two faces presented depict the same emotion category. Participants will have 5 seconds to make the decision and indicate by pressing a key in the keyboard. Accuracy will be quantified in percent correct. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Flavio Frohlich, PhD | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
| Hae Won Shin, MD | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27023427 | Background | Alagapan S, Schmidt SL, Lefebvre J, Hadar E, Shin HW, FrÓ§hlich F. Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent. PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 29;14(3):e1002424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002424. eCollection 2016 Mar. |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summary Data Set | View IPD |
De-identified electrophysiology data and task information (e.g. timing of each trial, timing of responses) will be shared at the end of the study in a central repository (e.g. zenodo)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham | Device | Sham trials where no electric pulse is delivered |
|
| Intracranial EEG will be collected simultaneously when the participants perform the task. 1 Hour |
| 1 Hour |
| Facial Recognition Task Performance - Reaction Time | Participants who consent will be administered this task. On a given trial, participants will be presented with images of two faces side-by-side. The faces will either match in terms of emotion category (e.g., 2 anger faces) or not (e.g., an anger face and a fear face). Faces presented together will always be of the same gender but different identities. Participants will be asked to determine whether the two faces presented depict the same emotion category. Participants will have 5 seconds to make the decision and indicate by pressing a key in the keyboard. Reaction times will be quantified in milliseconds. | 1 Hour |
Dataset supporting Alagapan et al. 2016 PLoS Biology |