Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This retrospective descriptive study is to determine what proportion of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates patients who underwent surgical management for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) would qualify for a basic office exam (BOE) alone, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial, and thus could have potentially had Urodynamic studies (UDS) omitted from their preoperative workup.
Urodynamic studies (UDS) are an assessment tool used to evaluate physiologic variables during bladder filling, bladder storage, and bladder emptying. They are commonly performed as part of the routine preoperative evaluation of women with symptoms of SUI. However, UDS are costly, with payments allowed by Medicare quoted at greater than $500, time consuming, uncomfortable, and have been shown to increase the risk of urinary tract infection. But most concerning is the fact that UDS have not been shown to improve surgical outcomes.
In 2012, the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial evaluated 630 women who underwent a basic office exam (BOE) or BOE plus UDS, and concluded that for women with uncomplicated, demonstrable SUI a BOE alone was not inferior to evaluation with UDS for outcomes at 1 year. This recent publication has resulted in urogynecology practices across the country evaluating their own standard of care when it comes to preoperative evaluation of SUI.
Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. standard practice is to perform UDS on all patients undergoing surgery for SUI. The providers of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. would be remiss if the providers did not follow this trend and evaluate their own personal practice of preoperative UDS in patients presenting with SUI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUI Surgery Patients in 2015 | All women 18 years of age or older, who underwent surgery for SUI between January 2015 and December 2015 |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients who meet VALUE trial criteria | A patient meets all the inclusion criteria and doesn't meet any of exclusion criteria of the VALUE trial will be classified under the category of who meets VALUE trial criteria. | Within 15 months to the initial presentation |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All women 18 years of age or older, who under went surgery for SUI performed by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. between January 2015 and December 2015
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rachel Pauls, MD | TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45220 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22551104 | Background | Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, Sirls LT, Norton PA, Arisco AM, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Barber MD, Dandreo KJ, Menefee SA, Kenton K, Lowder J, Richter HE, Khandwala S, Nygaard I, Kraus SR, Johnson HW, Lemack GE, Mihova M, Albo ME, Mueller E, Sutkin G, Wilson TS, Hsu Y, Rozanski TA, Rickey LM, Rahn D, Tennstedt S, Kusek JW, Gormley EA; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1987-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113595. Epub 2012 May 2. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Oct 19, 2022 | |
| Reset | Aug 31, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2022 | Aug 31, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided