Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| VA Office of Research and Development | FED |
| VA Palo Alto Health Care System | FED |
| US Department of Veterans Affairs | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose: Implement a Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model that identifies and proactively manages Veterans at the highest risk for hospital admission and death while the patient is still in the ambulatory care setting.
Goal:
Objectives:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention--PACT Intensive Management | Experimental | The intervention is the PACT Intensive Management Program (PIM) which provides intensive interdisciplinary care planning, care coordination, patient self-management support, and tailored goal setting based on patient needs and preferences, and additional care management services. |
|
| Usual care | No Intervention | High-Risk patients receiving care in PACT. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACT Intensive Management | Behavioral | Purpose: Implement a Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model that identifies and proactively manages Veterans at the highest risk for hospital admission and death while they are still in the ambulatory care setting. Goal:
Objectives:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| VA health care cost | Total costs of VA care, including inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy and fee-basis services. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Utilization | VA central repository administrative data will be analyzed to calculate utilization of hospital, emergency and outpatient primary and specialty care. This information will be electronically abstracted through the VA central repository administrative data center | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Engagement | The investigators will look at patient PIM enrollment data by utilizing qualitative data. The data will be collected through qualitative interviews with patients and PACT providers. Provider Interviews questions: Tell me what kinds of things you and your team have been doing to try to engage patients What types of patients have you been able to engage most successfully? Once patients have started to engage with the PIM team, how do you prioritize what to work on with them? Patient Interview questions: Has working with the PIM team made a difference in your health? Have you changed how you take care of yourself since you have been part of PIM? If you were going to tell another Veteran about this program, what would you say (are the pros and cons)? How would you say you have benefitted from being in this program? What have been the drawbacks of being in this program? |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa Rubenstein, MD | VAGLAHS- WLA | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29868706 | Derived | Yoon J, Chang E, Rubenstein LV, Park A, Zulman DM, Stockdale S, Ong MK, Atkins D, Schectman G, Asch SM. Impact of Primary Care Intensive Management on High-Risk Veterans' Costs and Utilization: A Randomized Quality Improvement Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 19;168(12):846-854. doi: 10.7326/M17-3039. Epub 2018 Jun 5. | |
| 29698772 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 29, 2020 | Feb 4, 2020 | Prot_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Total Medicare Cost |
Data will be extracted from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse to capture patient Medicare cost. Medicare claims data to measure total patient inpatient and outpatient cost for services reimbursed by Medicare. Inpatient cost will be measured as cost for total acute hospitalizations, and subcategories: medical, surgical, psychiatric, rehabilitation, hospice and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Outpatient cost will be measured as the cost for combined visits in VHA and elsewhere reimbursed by Medicare in 9 categories: primary care, specialty care, mental health, surgical, home health, nursing home, diagnostic, rehabilitation and ED. |
| 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Total Medicare Utilization | Data will be extracted from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse to capture patient utilization. Medicare claims data to measure total patient inpatient and outpatient utilization for services reimbursed by Medicare. Inpatient utilization will be measured as counts of total acute hospitalizations, and subcategories: medical, surgical, psychiatric, rehabilitation, hospice and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Outpatient utilization will be measured as the number of combined visits in VHA and elsewhere reimbursed by Medicare in 9 categories: primary care, specialty care, mental health, surgical, home health, nursing home, diagnostic, rehabilitation and ED. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Functional status | Patient report of their physical, social, and mental functional status is routinely collected as part of their medical visit as health factor data. The data will be abstracted through the VA central repository administrative data. The variables used to measure functional status are the following:
| 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Patient Quality of Life Status | Patient assessment of their quality of life collected as part of their medical care as a health factor. This information will be electronically abstracted through the VA central repository administrative data center. The variables used to assess a patient's quality of life are the following:
| 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Patient Symptom Burden | Patient assessment of symptom burden is routinely collected as part of their care and documented in their medical record and will be electronically abstracted through the VA central repository administrative data center. Mental Health and physical burdens are abstracted from the medical record utilizing ICD-9 and ICD-10 code. It will be assessed as yes/no if present. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Anxiety | Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2): (Not at all; several days; More than half the days, nearly every day). The higher the score the higher the anxiety. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Substance Abuse | The 3-item AUDIT-C scored on a scale of 0-12; Drugs: How many times in the past year, have you used an illegal drug or used a prescription medication for nonmedical reasons? (Yes/No, Number of times). The greater the score the worse the substance abuse status. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Cognitive Status | The Blessed-Short and/or the Mini-Cog where the lower the score the more impairment. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Pain level | Pain in past 24 hours on scale of 0 = no pain, to 10 = worst pain imaginable. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Shortness of Breath | Shortness of breath in past 24 hours on a scale of 0, no shortness of breath, to 10, worst imaginable. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Problems with constipation | Constipation in past 24 hours on a scale from 0, no constipation, to 10, worst imaginable. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Sleep Problems | Sleep problems in past 24 hours on a scale from 0, no sleep problems, to 10, worst imaginable. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Level of Fatigue | Fatigue in past 24 hours on a scale from 0, no fatigue, to 10, worst imaginable. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Risk of Falls | Falls (Patient reports no falls in past 12 months;Patient reports no problems with walking or balance; Patient reports problems with walking or balance; Patients reports falls in past 12 months | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Implementation Outcome/challenges | Implementation barriers and facilitators, feasibility, and sustainability will be obtained through stakeholder interviews of patients, staff and facility leaders. PIM Staff topics include program goals, patient enrollment, engagement strategies, patient decision making; target population, gaps in care, care coordination, readiness, resource adequacy, and sustainability. PIM program leader topics include lessons learned, impact and sustainability, and implementation process. Patient topics include experience in program, engagement in care and suggestions for improvement. PACT teamlet topics include exposure to PIM, the impact on workload, the services PIM provides, feasibility of providing PIM services, impact and sustainability of PACT on working with PIM team. Facility leaders topics include PIM program goals, specialty service programs, target population, and services for high-risk patients, PACT functioning, PIM affects patients on services, and facility. | 2 years (two 1-year points) |
| Primary Care Staff Job Satisfaction | We will survey Primary Care Providers (PCPs) (physicians, MDs/DOs; nurse practitioners, NPs; physician assistants, PAs) and nurses (registered nurses, RNs; licensed practical nurses, LPNs; licensed vocational nurses-LVNs) at the five healthcare systems that have a PIM team. We will use both online using RedCap and paper-and-pen versions of the survey to increase response rate. We will survey Primary Care staff at baseline and one year later. Primary Care Staff Job Satisfaction is measured by a single item "Overall, I am satisfied with my job," rated on a 5-point Likert agreement scale. (Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree). The higher the score the higher the satisfaction. • Overall, I am satisfied with my job. (Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree). The higher the score the higher the satisfaction. | 3 years (two waves) |
| Primary Care staff Intention to Stay at the VA | We will survey Primary Care Providers (PCPs) (physicians, MDs/DOs; nurse practitioners, NPs; physician assistants, PAs) and nurses (registered nurses, RNs; licensed practical nurses, LPNs; licensed vocational nurses-LVNs) at the five healthcare systems that have a PIM team. We will use both online using RedCap and paper-and-pen versions of the survey to increase response rate. We will survey Primary Care staff at baseline and one year later. Intention to Stay at the VA is measured by a single item "I intend to continue working in PC at the VA for the next two years," rated on a 5-point Likert agreement scale. (Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree). The higher the score the higher the satisfaction. | 3 years (two waves) |
| Chang ET, Zulman DM, Asch SM, Stockdale SE, Yoon J, Ong MK, Lee M, Simon A, Atkins D, Schectman G, Kirsh SR, Rubenstein LV; PIM Executive Committee and Demonstration Sites. An operations-partnered evaluation of care redesign for high-risk patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): Study protocol for the PACT Intensive Management (PIM) randomized quality improvement evaluation. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jun;69:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 23. |