Automated Closed Loop Propofol Anaesthesia Versus Desflurane Inhalation Anaesthesia In Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Randomized Analysis of Recovery Profile
Automated Closed Loop Propofol Anaesthesia Versus Desflurane Inhalation Anaesthesia In Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Randomized Analysis of Recovery Profile
Complete recovery from anaesthesia is absolutely desirable in the obese patients to avoid postoperative airway, oxygen ventilation or sleep apnea related complications. Over the years, Desflurane has emerged as the anaesthetic agent of choice for maintenance of anaesthesia in obese patients for its efficient elimination profile and ability to facilitate early recovery from anaesthesia. Alternatively, Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent administered as a part of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) regimen. However, it is a lipid soluble drug and there are concerns that it may accumulate in obese patients due to their increased proportion of body fat Therefore, Propofol TIVA is likely to result in a prolonged duration of action and consequently, delayed emergence from anaesthesia and a protracted recovery time. A recent advance in the delivery of Propofol to the patient is the development of computer-controlled anesthesia delivery systems. These devices deliver Propofol based on feedback from patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by monitoring bispectral index (BIS). Evaluation of anesthesia delivery by these systems has shown that Propofol and maintain depth of anesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual/simple infusion administration. This, in turn, holds promise that recovery from Propofol anaesthesia can also be favourable in the obese patients. An indigenously developed computer-controlled anesthesia delivery sytem is the closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS), which has been extensively evaluated in patients belonging to different surgical settings. The evidence generated with Propofol anaesthesia delivered by CLADS has shown significant improvement in recovery outcome.The performance of CLADS has not yet been evaluated in obese surgical patients. We hypothesise that in the obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, automated delivery of Propofol using CLADS would allow precision control of anaesthesia depth, intra-operative haemodynamics, and rapid recovery from anaesthesia. We plan to conduct a randomised controlled investigation to compare patient recovery profile following Desflurane anaesthesia versus CLADS empowered Propofol anaesthesia.
After Institutional Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, forty-participants (20 per group) aged 18-65 years, ASA physical status I/III, BMI >35-kg/m2, of either sex, and undergoing laparoscopic/robotic bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass) will be included in this single center (Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi-110060, India) prospective, double-blinded, two-arm, randomised controlled study.
The patients who qualify inclusion criteria and consent for recruitment will be randomly divided into one of the two groups:
Group-1 [CLADS Group, n=20]: Anaesthesia will be induced and maintained with Propofol administered using the automated CLADS.
Group-2 [Desflurane Group, n=20]: Anaesthesia will be induced with Propofol administered using the automated CLADS and will be maintained with Desflurane.
Sample-size Estimation
In a previous study, the time-to-eye opening with Desflurane and Propofol was 4.2 minutes and 10.7 minutes, respectively. Based on above, a samples size of 15-patients will be required per group to provide 90% power with a bilateral α-risk value of 0.05 to posit a significant difference in time-to-eye opening. We plan to recruit a total of 40-patients to cover up for unanticipated losses after the recruitment.
Randomization, Allocation Concealment
The patients will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups based on a computer-generated random number table (url:stattrek.com/statistics/random-number-generator.aspx). Randomization sequence concealment will include opaque-sealed envelopes with alphabetic codes whose distribution will be in control of an independent analyst. The envelopes will be opened; patient's data-slip will be pasted on them, and will be sent back to the control analyst.
Blinding Strategy
The attending anaesthesiologist will not be blinded to the technique utilized to administer GA and recovery immediately after extubation inside the OR. However, the postoperative patient recovery profile will be evaluated by an independent assessor blinded to the technique of GA.
Management of Anesthesia
Two peripheral venous lines (18G/20G catheter) will be secured. Standard monitoring (EKG, NIBP, pulse oximeter, EtCO2) will be applied. A BIS sensor (Covidien IIc, Mansfield, USA) will be applied over the patient's forehead according to manufacturer's instruction prior to induction of anaesthesia for monitoring depth of anaesthesia. The BIS monitoring module (Model DSC-XP, Aspect medical system, USA) will facilitate monitoring of anaesthesia depth.
Anaesthesia Technique
All the patients will be administered pre-induction fentanyl-citrate analgesia as per a predefined strategy (total 2-µg/kg IV: 1-µg/kg at 0 minute and 3-minute time point). Pre-oxygenation will be initiated at 3-minute time point or prior to that if there is a fall in oxygen saturation (< 94 percent). In both the groups, at 6-minute time point, anesthesia will be induced with Propofol administered by CLADS. In both the groups CLADS will be set to deliver Propofol according to lean body weight (LBW). A BIS-value of 50 will be used as the target for induction of anesthesia. After induction of anesthesia, atracurium besylate 0.05-mg/kg will be administered for skeletal muscle relaxation to facilitate tracheal intubation. Ventilator settings of CMV, tracheal tube size [7.5-mm I.D (male), 6.5-mm I.D (female)], and breathing circuit (circle-CO2 absorber system) will be the standardized in all the patients. Thereafter, the patients in the CLADS group will receive anaesthesia maintenance with Propofol, with the dosing based on adjusted body weight (ABW), and administration controlled with CLADS tuned to consistent anaesthetic depth (BIS-50) feedback from the patients. The patients in Desflurane group will receive anaesthesia maintenance with Desflurane dial concentration titrated to maintain a BIS of 50-55 in all the patients. Oxygen-air mixture (FiO2 0.50) will be used for ventilation in both the groups.
In addition, starting post-intubation, all the patients will receive 1.0-µg/kg/hr fentanyl infusion for intraoperative analgesia. Intraoperative muscle relaxation will be maintained using atracurium boluses controlled by train-of-four response on peripheral neuromuscular monitor (Infinity TridentNMT Smartpod, Draeger Medical Systems, Inc Telford, USA).
Thirty minutes before the end of surgery, non-opioid analgesics, such as paracetamol 1-gm, and tramadol 100-mg will be administered to the patient. The Propofol or Desflurane delivery will be stopped at the point of completion of skin closure. Residual neuromuscular blockade (assessed with train-of-four response) will be reversed with neostigmine (50-µg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (20-µg/kg).
Thirty minutes before the end of surgery, non-opioid analgesics, such as paracetamol 1-gm, and tramadol 100-mg will be administered to the patient. The Propofol or Desflurane delivery will be stopped at the point of completion of skin closure. Residual neuromuscular blockade (assessed with train-of-four response) will be reversed with neostigmine (50-µg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (20-µg/kg).
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: