Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to assess analgesic efficacy of ASP8062 relative to placebo as well as the safety and tolerability. This study also assessed the treatment differences in physical function as well the improvements in overall subject status (e.g., fibromyalgia symptoms, global functioning) of ASP8062 relative to placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASP8062 | Experimental | Participants received 30 mg of ASP8062 orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received matching placebo orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASP8062 | Drug | ASP8062 30 mg was administered orally as a single daily dose, taken preferably in the morning with or without food. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) | The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | Baseline and week 8 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), which included abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc.) if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant. A TEAE was defined as any AE that started or worsened after the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. AEs were considered serious (SAEs) if the AE resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, resulted in congenital anomaly, or birth defect or required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization. TEAEs in drug abuse, dependence and withdrawal standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) are special AEs of interest grouped together using the SMQ tool (MedDRA v20.0). | From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 87 days) |
| Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation | The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal ideation (1. Wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan, 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and End of Treatment (EOT) in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRS | The mean daily average pain score was assessed through the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT analysis, participants with missing baseline or EOT data were classified as nonresponders. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject has a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 45 kg/m^2.
Female subject must either:
Female subject must agree not to breastfeed at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
Female subject must not donate ova starting at Screening, throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
Male subject must not donate sperm starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
A sexually active male subject with female partner(s) who are of childbearing potential is eligible if:
Male subject with a partner of child-bearing potential, or a pregnant or breastfeeding partner(s) must agree to remain abstinent or use a condom throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
Subject meets the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria at Screening:
Subject meets the ACR 2010 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria at Screening:
Subject has a pain score ≥ 4 on the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR) pain item at Screening.
Subject is compliant with daily pain recordings during the Baseline Diary Run-In period, as defined by the completion of a minimum of 5 of 7 daily average pain ratings and agrees to complete daily diaries throughout the duration of the study.
Subject has a mean daily average pain score ≥ 4 and ≤ 9 on an 11-point 0 to 10 NRS as recorded in the subject e-diary during the Baseline Diary Run-In period, and meeting pre-specified criteria for daily average pain scores.
Subject agrees to use only acetaminophen as rescue medication for fibromyalgia pain throughout the course of the trial (up to 1000 mg per dose and not to exceed 3000 mg/day).
Subject agrees not to initiate or change any non-pharmacologic interventions (including normal daily exercise routines, chiropractic care, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and massage therapy) during the course of the study. Non-pharmacologic interventions must be stable for a minimum of 30 days prior to Screening. And subject agrees to maintain usual level of activity for the duration of the study.
Subject is capable of completing study assessments and procedures.
Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study from Screening through the End of Study (EOS) visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Director | Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noesis Pharma, LLC | Phoenix | Arizona | 85032 | United States | ||
| Excell Research, Inc |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website | View source |
Not provided
Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants underwent a screening period (up to 42 days), where washout of medications and a 7-day baseline diary run-in were completed. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) after confirmation of eligibility (which also required a mean daily average pain score of ≥ 4 and ≤ 9 [per Daily Average Pain Numerical Rating Scale] to enter the study).
Participants with fibromyalgia (FM) were enrolled in 24 sites in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
| FG001 | ASP8062 | Participants received 30 mg of ASP8062 orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 14, 2017 | Mar 5, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo was administered orally as a single daily dose, taken preferably in the morning with or without food. |
|
| Weeks 1 to 8 |
| Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to C-SSRS: Suicidal Behavior | The C-SSRS is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal behavior (1. Preparatory acts or behavior, 2. Aborted attempt, 3. Interrupted attempt, 4. Actual attempt, 5. Completed suicide). | Weeks 1 to 8 |
| Baseline to week 8 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and EOT in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRS | The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT analysis, participants with missing baseline or EOT data were classified as nonresponders. | Baseline to week 8 |
| Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and EOT in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Function Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days or the last time the activity was performed if not within the 7-day recall period. The Function subscale has a range of scores of 0 to 90, with a lower score indicating better (higher) function. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
| Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Symptoms Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Symptoms subscale range of scores is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a better (lower) level of symptoms. A negative change indicates a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
| Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Overall Impact Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Overall Impact subscale has a range of scores from 0 to 20, with a lower score indicating better (lower) impact. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
| Overall Participant Improvement as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The PGIC is a self-administered 7-point Likert scale that asks participants to evaluate their fibromyalgia relative to baseline. This is a single question and the grade ranges from 1 ("Very Much Improved") to 7 ("Very Much Worse"). | Weeks 2, 4, 8 |
| Oceanside |
| California |
| 92056 |
| United States |
| Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC. | Torrance | California | 90502 | United States |
| PAB Clinical Research | Brandon | Florida | 33511 | United States |
| Avail Clinical Research, LLC | DeLand | Florida | 32720 | United States |
| Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc | Orlando | Florida | 32801 | United States |
| Chicago Research Center, Inc | Chicago | Illinois | 60634 | United States |
| Medisphere Medical Research Center, LLC | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Infinity Medical Research, Inc | North Dartmouth | Massachusetts | 02747 | United States |
| Elite Clinical Research, LLC | Jackson | Mississippi | 39202 | United States |
| The Center For Pharmaceutical Research | Kansas City | Missouri | 64114 | United States |
| Advanced Biomedical Research of America | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89123 | United States |
| NY Scientific | Brooklyn | New York | 11235 | United States |
| Neurobehavioral Research, Inc | Cedarhurst | New York | 11516 | United States |
| Private Practice | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| PMG of Winston-Salem, LLC | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Neuro-Behavioral Clinical Research, Inc | Canton | Ohio | 44718 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Summit Research Network | Portland | Oregon | 97210 | United States |
| Lehigh Center for Clinical Research | Allentown | Pennsylvania | 18104 | United States |
| Omega Medical Research | Warwick | Rhode Island | 02886 | United States |
| Meridian Clinical Research | Dakota Dunes | South Dakota | 57049 | United States |
| ClinSearch, LLC | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37421 | United States |
| Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc | Kenosha | Wisconsin | 53142 | United States |
| Treated |
|
| COMPLETED | Completed the treatment period. |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The analysis population was the safety analysis set (SAF), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
| BG001 | ASP8062 | Participants received 30 mg of ASP8062 orally once daily for 8 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Baseline Mean Daily Average Pain Score Group | The baseline mean daily average pain score was assessed through the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The baseline mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants in the 7-day electronic baseline diary. | The analysis population was the FAS. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||
| Baseline Mean Daily Average Pain Score | The baseline mean daily average pain score was assessed through the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The baseline mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants in the 7-day electronic baseline diary. | The analysis population was the full analysis set (FAS), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) | The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | The analysis population was the full analysis set (FAS), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants with available data at baseline were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline and week 8 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), which included abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc.) if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant. A TEAE was defined as any AE that started or worsened after the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. AEs were considered serious (SAEs) if the AE resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, resulted in congenital anomaly, or birth defect or required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization. TEAEs in drug abuse, dependence and withdrawal standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) are special AEs of interest grouped together using the SMQ tool (MedDRA v20.0). | The analysis population was the SAF. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 87 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal Ideation | The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal ideation (1. Wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan, 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). | The analysis population was the SAF. Participants with available data were included in the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Weeks 1 to 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to C-SSRS: Suicidal Behavior | The C-SSRS is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal behavior (1. Preparatory acts or behavior, 2. Aborted attempt, 3. Interrupted attempt, 4. Actual attempt, 5. Completed suicide). | The analysis population was the SAF. Participants with available data were included in the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Weeks 1 to 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and End of Treatment (EOT) in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRS | The mean daily average pain score was assessed through the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT analysis, participants with missing baseline or EOT data were classified as nonresponders. | The analysis population was the FAS. Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) was used for week 8. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used for EOT. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Baseline to week 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and EOT in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRS | The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT analysis, participants with missing baseline or EOT data were classified as nonresponders. | The analysis population was the FAS. BOCF was used for week 8. LOCF was used for EOT. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Baseline to week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and EOT in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Function Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days or the last time the activity was performed if not within the 7-day recall period. The Function subscale has a range of scores of 0 to 90, with a lower score indicating better (higher) function. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | The analysis population was the FAS. Participants with available data at baseline were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EOT. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Symptoms Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Symptoms subscale range of scores is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a better (lower) level of symptoms. A negative change indicates a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | The analysis population was the FAS. Participants with available data at baseline were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EOT. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Overall Impact Subscale Score | The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Overall Impact subscale has a range of scores from 0 to 20, with a lower score indicating better (lower) impact. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome). | The analysis population was the FAS. Participants with available data at baseline were included in the analysis. LOCF was used for EOT. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Participant Improvement as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The PGIC is a self-administered 7-point Likert scale that asks participants to evaluate their fibromyalgia relative to baseline. This is a single question and the grade ranges from 1 ("Very Much Improved") to 7 ("Very Much Worse"). | The analysis population was the FAS. Modified LOCF (mLOCF) was used for weeks 2, 4, and 8, where "No Change" was imputed for participants who discontinued due to lack of efficacy or AEs, and LOCF was used for participants who discontinued due to other reasons. LOCF was used for EOT. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Weeks 2, 4, 8 |
|
|
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 87 days)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo orally once daily for 8 weeks. | 0 | 88 | 0 | 88 | 17 | 88 |
| EG001 | ASP8062 30 mg | Participants received 30 mg of ASP8062 orally once daily for 8 weeks. | 0 | 95 | 0 | 95 | 38 | 95 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Institute and/or Principal Investigator may publish trial data generated at their specific study site after Sponsor publication of the multi-center data. Sponsor must receive a site's manuscript prior to publication for review and comment as specified in the Investigator Agreement.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial Disclosure | Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. | 800-888-7704 | astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 19, 2018 | Mar 5, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000709210 | ASP8062 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
| Other |
|
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Mild: > 0 to < 4 |
|
| Moderate: >= 4 to < 7 |
|
| Severe: >= 7 to 10 |
|
| Superiority |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Minimally Improved |
|
| No Change |
|
| Minimally Worse |
|
| Much Worse |
|
| Very Much Worse |
|
| Minimally Improved |
|
| No Change |
|
| Minimally Worse |
|
| Much Worse |
|
| Very Much Worse |
|
| Minimally Improved |
|
| No Change |
|
| Minimally Worse |
|
| Much Worse |
|
| Very Much Worse |
|