Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective is to evaluate the benefit of the SmartDelay™ algorithm in patients with a prolonged RV-LV interval.
The primary hypothesis of SMART CRT is that among cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) patients with prolonged inrerventricular delay between the RV and LV leads, CRT with atrioventricular optimization (AVO) will result in greater reverse LV remodeling compared with CRT programmed at nominal settings (120 ms).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartDelay™ algorithm | Other | Subjects programmed with AV Delay and pacing chamber determined by SmartDelay |
|
| Fixed AV Delay with BiV pacing | Other | Subjects programmed with a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms with BiV pacing |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRT-D | Device | Commercially approved quadripolar Boston Scientific Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) devices and future generations of BSC X4 CRT-D devices approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies will be included in the trial. All devices utilized in the study will include SmartDelay™ and must be capable of providing SmartDelay recommendations for both biventricular pacing (BiV) and Left Ventricular (LV) only pacing. All enrolled subjects with implanted BSC X4 CRT-D system and identified with an RV-LV delay of ≥70ms were 1:1 randomized. Randomization occurred in the electronic data capturing system. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CRT Response | Comparing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response rates between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement; CRT response is defined by a change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) < -15% at 6 months compared to pre-implant baseline. | Pre-Implant baseline to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (Absolute Change) | Comparing absolute changes in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 6-Month measurement - Implant measurement, in milliliters. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Social Limitation Score | The KCCQ Social Limitation Domain quantifies the extent to which heart failure symptoms impair patients' ability to interact in a number of gender-neutral social activities. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject must be indicated to receive a de novo quadripolar Boston Scientific Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) in conjunction with an ACUITY X4 LV lead. This includes subjects who are indicated to receive an upgrade to a BSC X4 CRT-D from a previously implanted device.
In order to achieve a homogenous population for the study, qualifying subjects are those with heart failure who meet BSC US indications for use defined as those subjects who receive stable optimal pharmacologic therapy (OPT) for heart failure and who meet any one of the following classifications:
Subject is age 18 or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to each country and national laws
Subject is willing and capable of providing informed consent
Subject is willing and capable of complying with visits and procedures as defined by this protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R. Gold, MD | Medical University of South Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Hospital, LLC d/b/a Granview Medical Center | Birmingham | Alabama | 35243 | United States | ||
| Heart Center Research LLC |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37183700 | Derived | Gold MR, Ellenbogen KA, Leclercq C, Lowy J, Rials SJ, Shoda M, Tomassoni G, Issa Z, Sarrazin JF, Jennings JM, Nair DG, Wold N, Yong P, Harbin MM, Stein KM, Auricchio A. Effects of Atrioventricular Optimization on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results of the SMART-CRT Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;16(6):e011714. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011714. Epub 2023 May 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
699 subjects were enrolled. 259 were exited prior to randomization (88 not implanted, 7 no RV-LV measurement, 161 RV-LV < 70ms, 3 no viable pacing vector). Subjects with an RV-LV delay >= 70ms were randomized (n = 440). Randomized subjects received a Boston Scientific Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and were randomized 1:1 to have either an AV Delay and pacing chamber determined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms with BiV pacing.
Commercially approved quadripolar Boston Scientific CRT-D devices and future generations of BSC X4 CRT-D devices approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies were included in the trial. All devices utilized in the study will include SmartDelay™ and must be capable of providing SmartDelay recommendations for both biventricular pacing (BiV) and Left Ventricular (LV) only pacing.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SmartDelay™ Algorithm | AV Delay and pacing chamber were determined by SmartDelay algorithm |
| FG001 | Fixed AV Delay With BiV Pacing | Fixed AV Delay of 120ms with BiV pacing was programmed |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 10, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (Relative Change) | Comparing relative changes in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 100*(6-Month measurement - Implant measurement)/(Implant Measurement), in %. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Absolute Change) | Comparing absolute changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 6-Month measurement - Implant measurement, in % of blood ejected during LV contraction. A positive change in LVEF is considered an improvement. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Relative Change) | Comparing relative changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 100*(6-Month measurement - Implant measurement)/(Implant Measurement), in %. A positive change in LVEF is considered an improvement. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Clinical Composite Score (CCS) | Th CCS combines four metrics: all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, and quality of life as measured with the patient global assessment (GA) instrument. The CCS categorizes each subject into one of three groups: Improved, Unchanged or Worsened.
| Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score | The KCCQ is a disease-specific instrument for monitoring the health status and quality of life of subjects with congestive heart failure. It includes a total of 23 items that assess quality of life in the following domains: physical function, symptom frequency and severity, symptom stability, self-efficacy and knowledge, social function, and overall quality of life. These domains can be combined into a functional status summary score (derived from the physical function and symptom scales) and an overall summary score which combines the physical function, symptom, social function and quality of life domains. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life Score | KCCQ Quality of Life Domain is designed to reflect patients' assessment of their quality of life, given the current status of their heart failure. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Self-Efficacy Score | KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain quantifies patients' perceptions of how to prevent heart failure exacerbations and manage complications when they arise. This scale is not included in the summary scores. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Frequency Score | KCCQ Symptom Domain quantifies the frequency of clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Burden Score | KCCQ Symptom Domain quantifies the burden of clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation Score | KCCQ Physical Function Domain measures the limitations patients experience, due to their heart failure symptoms, in performing routine activities. Activities are common, gender-neutral, and generalizable across cultures, while also capturing a range of exertional requirements. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Implant to 6 Months |
| Huntsville |
| Alabama |
| 35801 |
| United States |
| University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center | Tucson | Arizona | 85724 | United States |
| Cardiology Associates of NE Arkansas | Jonesboro | Arkansas | 72401 | United States |
| Glendale Adventist Medical Center | Glendale | California | 91206 | United States |
| Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System | Salinas | California | 93901 | United States |
| Christiana Care Health Services | Newark | Delaware | 19718 | United States |
| Baptist Health Research Institute | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Watson Clinic Center for Research, Inc | Lakeland | Florida | 33805 | United States |
| Winter Haven Hospital | Winter Haven | Florida | 33881 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northside Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| The University of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| St. John's Hospital | Springfield | Illinois | 62701 | United States |
| Heart Group at Deaconness Hospital | Newburgh | Indiana | 47630 | United States |
| University of Iowa Hospitals | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| St. Elizabeth Healthcare | Edgewood | Kentucky | 41017 | United States |
| Baptist Health Lexington | Lexington | Kentucky | 40503 | United States |
| Lahey Hospital and Medical Center | Burlington | Massachusetts | 01805 | United States |
| Southcoast Health | Fall River | Massachusetts | 02720 | United States |
| Cardiovascular Institute of Michigan | Roseville | Michigan | 48066 | United States |
| Trinity Health Michigan d/b/a Michigan Heart | Ypsilanti | Michigan | 48197 | United States |
| HealthEast St. Joseph's Hospital | Saint Paul | Minnesota | 55102 | United States |
| The International Heart Institute on Montana Foundation | Missoula | Montana | 59802 | United States |
| Cardiovascular Associates of the Delaware Valley | Haddon Heights | New Jersey | 08035 | United States |
| The Valley Hospital | Paramus | New Jersey | 07652 | United States |
| New York Methodist Hospital | Brooklyn | New York | 11215 | United States |
| Novant Health Heart and Vascular Institute | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
| Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| The Ohio Health Research Institute- Grant Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43215 | United States |
| Providence Heart Institute | Portland | Oregon | 97225 | United States |
| Geisinger Clinic | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Pottstown Medical Specialist, Inc | Pottstown | Pennsylvania | 19464 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| North Central Heart | Sioux Falls | South Dakota | 57108 | United States |
| Dallas VA Research Corporation | Dallas | Texas | 75216 | United States |
| Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Foundation for Advancing Veterans' Health Research | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center | Richmond | Virginia | 23298 | United States |
| PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center | Vancouver | Washington | 98664 | United States |
| Institut universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec | Québec | Canada |
| Centre hospitalier du pays d'Aix | Aix-en-Provence | 13616 | France |
| CHU Grenoble | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
| CHRU de Lille | Lille | 59037 | France |
| Hopital Saint Philibert | Lille | 59160 | France |
| CHRU Hopital Pontchaillou | Rennes | 35000 | France |
| Centre Hôpital Universitaire Rouen, Hôpital Charles Nicolle | Rouen | 76031 | France |
| Centre Hôpital Universitaire Rangueil | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Unfalkrankenhaus Marzahn | Berlin | 12683 | Germany |
| University of Berlin, Charite Virchow Standort | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| Uni Jena | Jena | 07747 | Germany |
| Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf | Landshut | 84036 | Germany |
| Otto-von-Guericke-Universitaet Magdeburg | Magdeburg | 39120 | Germany |
| Mater Misericordiae University Hospital | Dublin | D07 R2WY | Ireland |
| Ospedale S. Orsola - Malpighi | Bologna | 40138 | Italy |
| Azienda Sanitaria Universtitaria Integrata di Trieste | Trieste | 34129 | Italy |
| Hirosaki University Hospital | Hirosaki-shi | Aomori | 036-8562 | Japan |
| Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital | Hiroshima | Hiroshima | 734-8530 | Japan |
| Tokyo Medical University Hospital | Shinjuku-Ku | Tokyo | 162-8666 | Japan |
| Shinshu University Hospital | Nagano | Japan |
| St. Antonius Ziekenhuis | Nieuwegein | 3435 CM | Netherlands |
| Hospital Infanta Cristina | Badajoz | Extremadura | 06080 | Spain |
| Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Fe | Valencia | 46026 | Spain |
| Cardiocentro Ticino | Lugano | CH-6900 | Switzerland |
| Royal Sussex County Hospital | Brighton | BN2 5BE | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital of Wales | Cardiff | CF144XW | United Kingdom |
| Hammersmith Hospital | London | W12 0HS | United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital | Newcastle upon Tyne | NE7 7DN | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham University Hospital | Nottingham | NG5 1PB | United Kingdom |
| Southampton University Hospital | Southampton | SO16 6YD | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SmartDelay™ Algorithm | AV Delay and pacing chamber were determined by SmartDelay algorithm |
| BG001 | Fixed AV Delay With BiV Pacing | Fixed AV Delay of 120ms with BiV pacing was programmed |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Data not reported on 44 participants. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification | The Stages of Heart Failure: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 meters).Comfortable only at rest. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | LVEF data was unavailable for some participants due to missing measurement or unreadable echocardiogram data. | Mean | Standard Deviation | % of blood ejected during LV contraction |
| ||||||||||||||
| Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) | LVESV data was unavailable for some participants due to missing measurement or unreadable echocardiogram data. | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliliters |
| ||||||||||||||
| Conduction Disorder | Data not reported for one participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| QRS width (ms) | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliseconds |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | CRT Response | Comparing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response rates between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement; CRT response is defined by a change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) < -15% at 6 months compared to pre-implant baseline. | A total of 130 randomized subjects did not contribute data to the primary endpoint analysis due to death or withdrawal prior to six months, missed six-month visit or incomplete/insufficient echocardiogram. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Pre-Implant baseline to 6 months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (Absolute Change) | Comparing absolute changes in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 6-Month measurement - Implant measurement, in milliliters. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement. | A total of 130 randomized subjects did not contribute data to the secondary endpoint analysis due to death or withdrawal prior to six months, missed six-month visit or incomplete/insufficient echocardiogram. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliliters | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (Relative Change) | Comparing relative changes in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 100*(6-Month measurement - Implant measurement)/(Implant Measurement), in %. A negative change in LVESV is considered an improvement. | A total of 130 randomized subjects did not contribute data to the secondary endpoint analysis due to death or withdrawal prior to six months, missed six-month visit or incomplete/insufficient echocardiogram. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | % change | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Absolute Change) | Comparing absolute changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 6-Month measurement - Implant measurement, in % of blood ejected during LV contraction. A positive change in LVEF is considered an improvement. | A total of 129 randomized subjects did not contribute data to the secondary endpoint analysis due to death or withdrawal prior to six months, missed six-month visit or incomplete/insufficient echocardiogram. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | % of blood ejected during LV contraction | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Relative Change) | Comparing relative changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction from Implant to 6 Months between AV Delay programming schemes defined by SmartDelay or a Fixed AV Delay of 120ms. Change is defined as 100*(6-Month measurement - Implant measurement)/(Implant Measurement), in %. A positive change in LVEF is considered an improvement. | A total of 129 randomized subjects did not contribute data to the secondary endpoint analysis due to death or withdrawal prior to six months, missed six-month visit or incomplete/insufficient echocardiogram. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | % change | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Composite Score (CCS) | Th CCS combines four metrics: all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, and quality of life as measured with the patient global assessment (GA) instrument. The CCS categorizes each subject into one of three groups: Improved, Unchanged or Worsened.
| Subjects that were followed through the end of the 6-month visit window and those that died and/or or had a heart failure hospitalization within the 6-month visit window contributed to this endpoint. A total of 34 subjects did not meet these conditions are were therefore excluded from endpoint analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Implant to 6 Months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score | The KCCQ is a disease-specific instrument for monitoring the health status and quality of life of subjects with congestive heart failure. It includes a total of 23 items that assess quality of life in the following domains: physical function, symptom frequency and severity, symptom stability, self-efficacy and knowledge, social function, and overall quality of life. These domains can be combined into a functional status summary score (derived from the physical function and symptom scales) and an overall summary score which combines the physical function, symptom, social function and quality of life domains. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Social Limitation Score | The KCCQ Social Limitation Domain quantifies the extent to which heart failure symptoms impair patients' ability to interact in a number of gender-neutral social activities. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life Score | KCCQ Quality of Life Domain is designed to reflect patients' assessment of their quality of life, given the current status of their heart failure. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Self-Efficacy Score | KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain quantifies patients' perceptions of how to prevent heart failure exacerbations and manage complications when they arise. This scale is not included in the summary scores. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Frequency Score | KCCQ Symptom Domain quantifies the frequency of clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Burden Score | KCCQ Symptom Domain quantifies the burden of clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Physical Limitation Score | KCCQ Physical Function Domain measures the limitations patients experience, due to their heart failure symptoms, in performing routine activities. Activities are common, gender-neutral, and generalizable across cultures, while also capturing a range of exertional requirements. KCCQ scores have a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Higher score indicates better quality of life. | Subjects that completed the KCCQ at both the implant and 6 month visits contributed to this endpoint. A total of 51 subjects did not contribute data to the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Implant to 6 Months |
|
|
Adverse events were collected for the entire duration of subject participation in the study. Subjects were followed for median of 6.5 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SmartDelay™ Algorithm | AV Delay and pacing chamber were determined by SmartDelay algorithm | 7 | 225 | 49 | 225 | 20 | 225 |
| EG001 | Fixed AV Delay With BiV Pacing | Fixed AV Delay of 120ms with BiV pacing was programmed | 0 | 215 | 46 | 215 | 22 | 215 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection > 30 Days Post-Implant (Pulse Generator-related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Unable to Capture (Right Atrial Lead-related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Right Atrial Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Right Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Left Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post-Surgical Wound Discomfort/Bruising/Swelling | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post-Surgical Infection (<=30 Days Post-Implant) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse Reaction - General | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma - Pocket (<=30 Days Post-Implant) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Thromboembolic Events | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Venous Occlusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Tachycardia/Monomorphic VT | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC) | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension/Orthostatic Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic Shock | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial Infarction | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Coronary Artery Disease | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral Vascular Disease | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mitral Stenosis | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Valvular Damage/Valvular Insufficiency | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest Pain - Ischemic | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnea | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary Embolism | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intracardiac Thrombus | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Septal Defect | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse Reaction - General | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Allergic Reaction | Immune system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Medication | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Death | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Systemic Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fever/Virus | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Physical Trauma | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abnormal Laboratory Values | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Genitourinary | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Integumentary | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocrine | Endocrine disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Immune | Immune system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cancer | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oversensing (Pulse Generator-related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inappropriate Tachy Therapy (Pulse Generator-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue (Pulse Generator-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Right Atrial Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Right Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extracardiac Stimulation (Right Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inappropriate Tachy Therapy (Right Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Unable to Capture (Left Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extracardiac Stimulation (Left Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Perforation at Implant (Left Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment (Left Ventricular Lead-Related) | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma - Pocket (<=30 days post-implant) | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Lower Extremity Edema | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Flutter | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Tachycardia / Other Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest Pain | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue / Weakness | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial Manager | Boston Scientific | 1-800-227-3422 | Sara.Veraghtert@bsci.com |
| Sep 15, 2021 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
| France |
|
|
| Canada |
|
|
| Germany |
|
|
| United Kingdom |
|
|
| Spain |
|
|
| Japan |
|
|
| Netherlands |
|
|
| Italy |
|
|
| Switzerland |
|
|
| Ireland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|