Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Technische Universität Dresden | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Amputation injuries of the fingertip are common in all ages. For decades it is known that conservatively treated fingertips can regenerate skin and soft tissues to form a functionally and cosmetically excellent new fingertip. Unfortunately, little is known about the mechanisms controlling this ability that, in humans, is confined to the fingertips. Even less is known about the bacteria that regularly colonize these wounds without noticeable negative impact on regeneration and healing. Medical evidence on fingertip regeneration in humans is largely limited to retrospective studies and case reports. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial on the conservative treatment of fingertip amputations in children and adults.
When managed without surgery, self-adhesive polyurethane film dressings are commonly used to establish a wet chamber around the injury. This provides the best conditions for tissue regeneration inhibiting the formation of scar tissue at the same time. Unfortunately these dressings do not offer mechanical protection, they do not stick to wet skin and leak malodorous wound fluid. The investigators therefore developed a silicone finger cap that deals with these problems offering a mechanically protected, wet chamber around the injury for optimal regeneration conditions. This finger cap also offers a puncturable reservoir for excess wound fluid, which by this route can be routinely analyzed for diagnostic and research purposes.
This randomized controlled trial will for the first time test acceptance, safety and efficacy of this novel medical device in comparison with conventional self-adhesive film dressings while gathering information on the clinical course and outcome of conservatively treated fingertip amputation injuries.
Based on sample size calculations for primary outcome, 22 patients older than 2 years will be enrolled within 24 hours after having suffered an injury distal to the distal interphalangeal joint comprising all layers of the skin with a substance defect that cannot be primarily adapted without further shortening of the finger or plastic surgery. Participants are randomly assigned to start their treatment for the first two weeks either with a conventional film dressing or with the novel silicone finger cap. They will be changed to the other modality for another two weeks before the patient or the guardian can decide, if they would want the film dressing or the finger cap for the rest of the treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone Finger Cap | Experimental | Patients randomized to this arm will be treated with the novel silicone finger cap for the first two weeks of treatment. |
|
| Film dressing | Active Comparator | Patients randomized to this arm will be treated with conventional film dressings for the first two weeks of treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone Finger cap | Device | Treatment with silicone finger cap |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance | Acceptance of the silicone finger cap in comparison with conventional film dressings. Patient decides which dressing he or she prefers for the remaining treatment. | At day 28 after injury |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability) | Safety of the finger cap in comparison to the film dressing. Patients are asked for adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAE). | At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete. |
| Disease-specific quality of life |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Guido Fitze, Prof. Dr. | Technische Universität Dresden | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus | Dresden | Saxony | 01307 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41193504 | Derived | Schultz J, Patel PA, Aires R, Wissing L, Glatte P, Seifert M, Gentzel M, Fitze G, Doyle AM, Sandoval-Guzman T. Human fingertip regeneration follows clinical phases with distinct proteomic signatures. NPJ Regen Med. 2025 Nov 5;10(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41536-025-00441-y. | |
| 29019891 | Derived | Schultz J, Leupold S, Grahlert X, Pfeiffer R, Schwanebeck U, Schrottner P, Djawid B, Artsimovich W, Kozak K, Fitze G. Study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot-trial on the semiocclusive treatment of fingertip amputation injuries using a novel finger cap. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(41):e8224. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008224. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005383 | Finger Injuries |
| D007239 | Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006230 | Hand Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled, pseudo-cross-over
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Film Dressing | Device | Treatment with conventional film dressing |
|
Determination of disease-specific quality of life during the treatment with the silicon finger cap in comparison to the film dressing using a modified quality of life Wuerzburg Wound Score |
| At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 4 months resp. till wound healing is complete. |
| Unplanned dressing changes as measured by number of dressing changes in addition to number of visits according to study protocol. | Necessity of unplanned dressing changes in comparison to the film dressing. | Up to 42 days resp. till wound healing is complete. |
| Microbiological colonization | Changes in microbiological colonization in the wound during treatment using microbiological analysis. | At Day 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete (if wound fluid is aspirable). |
| Re-epithelialization rate | Measuring of re-epithelialization rate | At Day 14, 28, 42 resp. till wound healing is complete. |
| Tissue growth | Determination of tissue growth during treatment using medical ultrasound | At day 28 and 4 months. |
| Function of the regenerated perspiratory glands | Ceck of function of the regenerated perspiratory glands using Moberg's Ninhydrin test. | At 4 months (Day 122). |
| Sensibility/Sensitivity of the injured fingertip | Check of sensibility/sensitivity of the injured fingertip using 2-point-discrimination threshold in the area of the injury is checked in comparison to the corresponding finger of the contralateral hand | At 4 months (Day 122). |
| Cosmetic aspects, measured using a check list/questionnaire | Checking a list of common deformities i.e. scarring, split nails. | At 4 months (Day 122). |