Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.
Groups of study:
120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.
Methods of randomization:
To insure that everyone had an equal chance of participation, randomization was guided by table of random numbers using computer generated system(SPSS: windous version8) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) double blinding technique was used thus; the investigator and the patient didn't know the group to which the patient was allocated.
Methodology:
All patients were subjected to the following:
(i) Complete history taking:
(iii) Consent: Informed consent is taken from each patients . (iv) Examination:
General examination.
Abdominal examination.
Pelvic examination to exclude pelvic pathology .
(v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo ( stugeron®, Mina Pharm. under licence Janssen Pharmaceutica, Egypt ) were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .
(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .
A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.
The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.
The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.
The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .
The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.
Post insertion instructions:
Palpation of strings should be performed monthly by the patient to verify continuing presence of the IUD after each menstrual flow. Caution the patient that the first 2 menses are typically heavier.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol group | Active Comparator | Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion. |
|
| placebo group | Placebo Comparator | Sixty women received the placebo vaginally six hours before IUD insertion. Placebo is the same in size, color and shape to misoprostol. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misoprostol | Drug | 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score | Pain scores were measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) consists of 10 cm horizontal straight line with 2 ends At 0 end there was no pain and at 10 there was a severe pain | At time of insertion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difficulty of insertion of IUD in both groups | Difficulty of IUD insertion was measured by a 10-point scale, on which 0 represented an extremely easy, and 10 an extremely difficult insertion | At time of insertion |
| side effects |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Maged | Kasr Alainy medical school | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kasr Alainy medical school | Cairo | 12151 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016595 | Misoprostol |
| D007434 | Intrauterine Devices |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011459 | Prostaglandins E, Synthetic |
| D011465 | Prostaglandins, Synthetic |
| D011453 | Prostaglandins |
| D015777 | Eicosanoids |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Intrauterine contraceptive device IUCD | Device | bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution. The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange. The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus . |
|
|
abdominal cramps, headache, nausea, diarrhea and fever
| from time of administration till insertion |
| D005231 |
| Fatty Acids, Unsaturated |
| D005227 | Fatty Acids |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| D012898 | Autacoids |
| D018836 | Inflammation Mediators |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| D003274 | Contraceptive Devices, Female |
| D003273 | Contraceptive Devices |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |