Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and patient-reported outcomes at 10 years following surgery for a cohort of Mobi-C subjects treated on the IDE/Post Approval studies
This is a prospective, multi-center, consecutive cohort study. Subjects invited to participate in this study will have completed the Mobi-C IDE study (G050212). In this study, five hundred and seventy-five subjects were randomized to either the Mobi-C prosthesis or the control treatment - conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with anterior cervical plating. The study was randomized in a 2 to 1 ratio (two Mobi-C subjects for every one subject receiving ACDF with anterior cervical plate). The subject retention rate for Mobi-C subjects was 80.1% (1 level)-84.4% (2 level) at 7 years.
As non-inferiority (1-level) and superiority (2-level) have been well established through 7 years, the design of this study will focus on the long-term outcomes of a cohort of the Mobi-C arm of the study and evaluate the durability of outcomes at 10 years. Study sites invited to participate will be those that enrolled at least 10 subjects, and also had the highest retention rates at 7 years (≥70%). All subjects at these sites will be contacted to participate in an additional 10 year follow up visit. It is estimated that up to 250 subjects will be enrolled at 9-12 study sites.
Certain endpoints are better assessed in comparison to the control ACDF arm, such as adjacent segment degeneration and subsequent surgery. This study has been amended to include a subset of sites that will also enroll control subjects. Up to 3 sites and 50 subjects will be included in this control cohort.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobi-C | Prior recipient of Mobi-C Disc in IDE/Post Approval Study |
| |
| ACDF | Prior control subject in IDE/Post Approval Study |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobi-C | Device | Device for cervical intervertebral disc replacement at one or two contiguous levels |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NDI Score | 10 Years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Success | Composite score composed of: 1) NDI improvement of at least 15 points (out of 50) from baseline; 2) No subsequent surgical intervention at the index level or levels; 3) No potentially (possibly or probably) device-related adverse event; 4) Maintenance or improvement in all components of neurologic status; and 5) No Mobi-C intraoperative changes in treatment. | 10 Year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mobi-C and control subjects treated on the IDE/Post Approval studies, with one or two level disc replacement
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange County Neurosurgical Associates | Laguna Hills | California | 92653 | United States | ||
| Desert Orthopedic Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27015130 | Background | Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25. | |
| 27162712 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Neck Pain/Arm Pain VAS | 10 Year |
| QOL SF-12 | 10 Year |
| Patient Satisfaction | Measured by a two questions scale that includes ranking of level of satisfaction and willingness to recommend treatment. | 10 Year |
| Secondary surgery Rate | 10 Years |
| Device related complications | 10 Years |
| Device displacement or migration | Radiographic assessment of movement of device from original placement | 10 Year |
| Range of motion | Radiographically measured angle, in degrees, between endplates of adjacent vertebrae | 10 Years |
| Disc Height | Radiographically measured distance, in mm, from corner of superior vertebra to corresponding corner of inferior vertebra | 10 Years |
| Heterotopic Ossification | Qualitative radiographic assessment using McAfee grading system, grades 1-4 | 10 Years |
| Adjacent Segment Degeneration | Qualitative radiographic assessment using Kellgren-Lawrence Disc Degeneration Grading, grades 0-IV | 10 Years |
| Rancho Mirage |
| California |
| 92270 |
| United States |
| UC Davis Spine Center | Sacramento | California | 95816 | United States |
| The Spine Institute | Santa Monica | California | 90403 | United States |
| Orthopedics Northeast | Fort Wayne | Indiana | 46825 | United States |
| Spine Institute of Louisiana | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71101 | United States |
| Texas Back Institute | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
| Texas Spine and Joint Hospital | Tyler | Texas | 75701 | United States |
| Background |
| Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, Nunley PD, Bae HW, Kim KD, Ohnmeiss DD. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Feb 26;10:10. doi: 10.14444/3010. eCollection 2016. |
| 26799118 | Background | Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Hisey MS, Kim KD, Gaede SE, Nunley PD. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):734-45. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15219. Epub 2016 Jan 22. |
| 26855020 | Background | Ament JD, Yang Z, Nunley P, Stone MB, Lee D, Kim KD. Cost Utility Analysis of the Cervical Artificial Disc vs Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):135-45. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001208. |