Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-A01096-39 | Other Identifier | ID-RCB number, ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Research Agency, France | OTHER |
| Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares the efficacy and tolerance of a new device (FLEXITHERALIGHT) for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of keratosis actinic in comparison of classical PDT with Aktilite®.
The study is an intraindividual comparison of two methods. The number of subjects to be enrolled is 47 patients. All participants will receive both two treatments in a single visit : a first period of 2.5 hours of illumination with FLEXITHERALIGHT device followed by a continuous red light Spectrum (between 7 and 10 minutes) with Aktilite® after an appropriate incubation of methyl aminolevulinate).
Patients will complete a pain assessment scale after receiving both treatments, then, 3 follow up visits will be scheduled.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional PDT | Active Comparator | Aktilite® Galderma |
|
| FLEXITHERALIGHT PDT | Experimental | Light Emitting Textile Device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLEXITHERALIGHT PDT | Device | Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 30 minutes+illumination 2.5 hours |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treated lesion response rate | Each treatment area will be counted, graded with Clinical grade of AK, mapped and photographed | up to month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analog scale of pain | Measure the pain and local tolerance graduation range 0 to 10 | Day 1 and D ay 7. |
| Scale for clinical assessment of the subject's skin aspect | 4-point scale that ranged of Excellent; No scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin. Good: No scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin, Fair: Slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration, Poor: Extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus) or, Childbearing potential, provided there is a confirmed negative urine pregnancy test prior to study treatment, to rule out pregnancy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laurent Mortier, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Lille | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRU, Hôpital Claude Huriez | Lille | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30367470 | Result | Vicentini C, Vignion-Dewalle AS, Thecua E, Lecomte F, Maire C, Deleporte P, Behal H, Kerob D, Duhamel A, Mordon S, Mortier L. Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the noninferiority of a new protocol involving irradiation with a light-emitting, fabric-based device (the Flexitheralight protocol) compared with the conventional protocol involving irradiation with the Aktilite CL 128 lamp. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Apr;180(4):765-773. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17350. Epub 2019 Jan 18. | |
| 31025952 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055623 | Keratosis, Actinic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011230 | Precancerous Conditions |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D007642 | Keratosis |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Split face intraindividual comparison
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Aktilite® Galderma | Device | Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 3 hours+illumination 7 to 10 minutes |
|
|
| Months 3 and Months 6 |
| Fluorescence measure of the PpIX | Measures with Fluoderm photometer | Baseline, after 3 hours of incubation, in case of treatment interruption, immediately after the treatment, and at 15 and 30 minutes after the end of the treatment. |
| Irradiance measure in mW/cm2 for each AK | Measures realised with a wattmeter OPHIR LaserSTAR to know the power of light delivered | during Aktilite® treatment at Day 1 |
| Rate of patients with at least 75% of reduction of the lesions | The reduction in the number of lesions will be calculated as a function of the initial number:≥4 destroyed if 5 lésions; ≥ 5 destroyed if 6 lésions and ≥6 destroyed if 7 lesions ≥4 destroyed if 5 lesions | Months 3 and Months 6 |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | The questionnaire of 10 questions is completed by the patient to evaluate his quality of life | At Day 7, Months 3 and Months 6 |
| Satisfaction Questionnaire | The questionnaire es created by the investigator to evaluate the comfort of the device. Patient will give his overall satisfaction and the will answer 7 questions on a 5-point scale that ranged from Not embarrassing, few embarrassing, embarrassing, Very embarrassing, I Don't know | At Day 7, Months 3 and Months 6 |
| Derived |
| Lecomte F, Vignion-Dewalle AS, Vicentini C, Thecua E, Deleporte P, Duhamel A, Mordon S, Mortier L. Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e11530. doi: 10.2196/11530. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |