Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-002066-32 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of Oleogel-S10 in Participants with Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB).
EB is a rare group of genetic skin fragility disorders characterised by blistering of the skin in response to minor injury. In most cases, onset of EB is at birth or shortly after. All participants affected by any type of EB share the main characteristic of repeatedly developing painful wounds that take days to months to heal. Current treatment of EB is primarily preventative and supportive including protection from mechanical forces by avoiding rubbing, early treatment of wounds to prevent infections, and protection of the wound with adequate non-adhesive dressings to enable healing.
The active pharmaceutical ingredient in Oleogel-S10 is a refined birch bark extract, quantified to 72 to 88% betulin.
This clinical study of Oleogel-S10 in patients with inherited EB has been carried out to investigate whether Oleogel-S10 is effective for treatment of EB wounds and safe for long-term use.
Oleogel-S10 was compared to a control gel. The control gel matched Oleogel-S10 in terms of texture and visual appearance to allow for double-blinding. The packaging for Oleogel-S10 gel and the control gel were identical. The participant received either Oleogel-S10 or control gel for a double-blind study phase of 90 days. The probability that the participant received Oleogel-S10 was 50%, which means that they had a 1 in 2 chance of receiving Oleogel-S10. However, in the follow-up phase of the study all participants were treated with Oleogel-S10 for a period of 24 months.
This clinical study was performed at 49 study sites in 26 countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong [China], Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States); 223 participants participated in total.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Experimental |
| |
| Control Gel | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Drug | 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment | Proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound (defined as EB partial-thickness wound of 10 cm2 to 50 cm2 in size and ≥21 days to <9 months in age) in subjects with inherited EB (subtypes DEB, JEB, or Kindler EB) within 45 days of treatment with Oleogel-S10 compared to control gel based on clinical assessment by the investigator (the wound was rated as "closed" at first appearance of complete re-epithelialization without drainage). | 45±7 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP) | The first key secondary endpoint was time to first complete closure of the EB target wound as evidenced by clinical assessment within 90 days or by EDBP, using a nonstratified log-rank test. If the primary analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint showed superiority at the 5% significance level, hierarchical confirmatory testing of the 6 key secondary endpoints was to be performed. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johannes S Kern, MD PhD | Melbourne Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Children's Hospital | Phoenix | Arizona | 85016 | United States | ||
| Children's Hospital Colorado |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42205007 | Derived | Sprecher E, Torres-Pradilla M, Fernandez MF, Bodemer C, Bruckner AL, de Macedo Barbosa SM, Diociaiuti A, Martinez AE, Palisson F, Nikolic M, Vicente A, de Lucas R, Temin NT, Lowe S, Kern JS, Murrell DF; EASE Study Group. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Oleogel-S10 (Birch Triterpenes) for Pediatric Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 2026 May 28. doi: 10.1111/pde.70224. Online ahead of print. | |
| 31186047 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All subjects satisfied the inclusion / exclusion criteria based on investigator assessment prior to entry into the study. 29 out of a total of 252 screened patients were reported as screen failures.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Oleogel-S10 | Oleogel-S10 (DBP & OLP): 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil |
| FG001 | Control Gel | Control gel (DBP): Vehicle gel; Oleogel-S10 (OLP): 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Phase (DBP) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 18, 2019 | Mar 30, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control gel | Drug | Sunflower oil, Cera flava/yellow wax, and Carnauba wax (matched Oleogel-S10 in terms of texture and visual appearance) |
|
|
| 90±7 days |
| Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP | The second key secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound within 90 days of treatment or by EDBP based on clinical assessment by the investigator. | 90±7 days |
| The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection) | The incidence of EB target wound infections between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP was assessed based on the total number of patients with an EB target wound infection, as evidenced by AEs and/or the use of topical and/or systemic antibiotics, and the total number of patients | 90±7 days |
| The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Target wound infections between baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP were assessed for maximum severity (maximum severity was evaluated if a subject had a wound infection event evidenced by AEs). [Note: Here, 1 event less is recorded in the control gel group as for the previous secondary outcome measure, because only wound infections that were reported as AEs could be assessed for severity and were included in this analysis.] | 90±7 days |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP | The evaluation of total body wound burden (TBWB) was based on clinical assessment using Section I (Skin) of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI). The EBDASI skin activity (blistering/erosions/crusting) was scored from 0 to 10 for each of 10 anatomical locations (excluding the anogenital and buttocks regions). Therefore, the total skin activity score (i.e., TBWB) could range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicative of less wound burden. The change in TBWB was assessed from baseline (DBP D0) to D90 or EDBP. | 90±7 days |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP | Change from Baseline at D90 or EDBP on the Itch Man Scale in patients 4-13 years of age. The scale runs from 0 (comfortable, no itch) to 4 (itches most terribly, impossible to sit still, concentrate). | 90±7 days |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Change in Leuven Itch Scale (patients ≥ 14 years of age) scores taken from two time points, Baseline and Day 90±7 [End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP)]. The Leuven Itch Scale measures six dimensions of the itch experience: Frequency Subscore (0 = Never to 100 = Always); Duration Subscore (0 = Between 0 and 30 minutes to 100 = More than 2 hours); Severity Subscore (0 = No itch to 100 = Worst possible itch); Consequences Subscore [0 = Never to 100 = Always (lower score indicates less negative consequences from the itch)]; Distress Subscore (0 = Not distressing at all to 100 = Very distressing); Surface Area Subscore (0-100, high values indicate more parts of the body are itching) | 90±7 days |
| Aurora |
| Colorado |
| 80045 |
| United States |
| Amjad Plastic Research | Miami | Florida | 33144 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Stony Brook University Hospital | Stony Brook | New York | 11790 | United States |
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45229 | United States |
| The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists | San Antonio | Texas | 78218 | United States |
| Consutorios Medicos (Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia) | Buenos Aires | 1425 | Argentina |
| Centro Médico Dra. De Salvo | Buenos Aires | 1426 | Argentina |
| Centro de investigaciones Metabolicas, CINME | Buenos Aires | C1056ABJ | Argentina |
| Sydney Children's Hospital | Sydney | New South Wales | 2031 | Australia |
| Premier Specialists | Sydney | New South Wales | 2217 | Australia |
| The Royal Melbourne Hospital | Parkville | Victoria | 3050 | Australia |
| Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Royal Children's Hospital | Parkville | Victoria | 3502 | Australia |
| Universitaetsklinik fuer Dermatologie | Salzburg | 5020 | Austria |
| IMIP | Recife | Pernanbuco | 50070550 | Brazil |
| Universidade Regional de Blumenau | Blumenau | Santa Catarina | 89020400 | Brazil |
| Instituto Da Crianca HCFMUSP | São Paulo | 05403.000 | Brazil |
| Fundacion Debra Chile | Santiago | 7760099 | Chile |
| Hospital De San Jose | Bogotá | DC | Colombia |
| University Hospital Brno, Children´s Hospital | Brno | 61500 | Czechia |
| Aarhus University Hospital | Aarhus | 8000 | Denmark |
| Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades | Paris | 75015 | France |
| CHU Toulouse - Hospital Larrey | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| S/R National Center of Dermatology and Venerology | Tbilisi | 159 | Georgia |
| Medical Center University Freiburg | Freiburg im Breisgau | 79104 | Germany |
| Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT | Hanover | 30173 | Germany |
| Hospital of Skin and Veneral Diseases "A. Syggros" | Athens | Attica | 16121 | Greece |
| Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine | Budapest | 1085 | Hungary |
| Our Ladys Childrens Hospital | Dublin | Ireland |
| Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | 64239 | Israel |
| Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico | Milan | 20122 | Italy |
| Bambino Gesù Children Hospital | Roma | 00165 | Italy |
| Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS | Roma | 00167 | Italy |
| Centrul Medical Sanador | Bucharest | 011025 | Romania |
| State Scientific Center for Dermatovenerology and Cosmetology | Moscow | 107076 | Russia |
| Scientific Center of Children's Health | Moscow | 119991 | Russia |
| University of Belgrade, School of Medicine | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Kandang Kerbau (KK) Women's and Children's Hospital | Singapore | 229899 | Singapore |
| Hospital Sant Joan de Déu | Barcelona | 08950 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitari de la Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | 8035 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Paz | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Hospital Viamed Santa Ángela de la Cruz | Seville | 41014 | Spain |
| Bern University Hospital | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
| National Children Specialized Hospital "Ohmatdyt" of Ministry of Health of Ukraine | Kyiv | 01135 | Ukraine |
| Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Trust | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Great Ormond Street hospital | London | WC1N3JH | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Kern JS, Schwieger-Briel A, Lowe S, Sumeray M, Davis C, Martinez AE. Oleogel-S10 Phase 3 study "EASE" for epidermolysis bullosa: study design and rationale. Trials. 2019 Jun 11;20(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3362-z. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Open-Label Phase (OLP) |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Oleogel-S10 | Oleogel-S10: 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil |
| BG001 | Control Gel | Control gel: Vehicle gel (all subjects switched to Oleogel-S10 in the OLP) |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m² |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment | Proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound (defined as EB partial-thickness wound of 10 cm2 to 50 cm2 in size and ≥21 days to <9 months in age) in subjects with inherited EB (subtypes DEB, JEB, or Kindler EB) within 45 days of treatment with Oleogel-S10 compared to control gel based on clinical assessment by the investigator (the wound was rated as "closed" at first appearance of complete re-epithelialization without drainage). | Full Analysis Set (FAS) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 45±7 days |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP) | The first key secondary endpoint was time to first complete closure of the EB target wound as evidenced by clinical assessment within 90 days or by EDBP, using a nonstratified log-rank test. If the primary analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint showed superiority at the 5% significance level, hierarchical confirmatory testing of the 6 key secondary endpoints was to be performed. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | 90±7 days |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP | The second key secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound within 90 days of treatment or by EDBP based on clinical assessment by the investigator. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90±7 days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection) | The incidence of EB target wound infections between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP was assessed based on the total number of patients with an EB target wound infection, as evidenced by AEs and/or the use of topical and/or systemic antibiotics, and the total number of patients | Full Analysis Set (FAS) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90±7 days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Target wound infections between baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP were assessed for maximum severity (maximum severity was evaluated if a subject had a wound infection event evidenced by AEs). [Note: Here, 1 event less is recorded in the control gel group as for the previous secondary outcome measure, because only wound infections that were reported as AEs could be assessed for severity and were included in this analysis.] | Full Analysis Set (FAS) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90±7 days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP | The evaluation of total body wound burden (TBWB) was based on clinical assessment using Section I (Skin) of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI). The EBDASI skin activity (blistering/erosions/crusting) was scored from 0 to 10 for each of 10 anatomical locations (excluding the anogenital and buttocks regions). Therefore, the total skin activity score (i.e., TBWB) could range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicative of less wound burden. The change in TBWB was assessed from baseline (DBP D0) to D90 or EDBP. | Patients with EBDASI skin activity score | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | 90±7 days |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP | Change from Baseline at D90 or EDBP on the Itch Man Scale in patients 4-13 years of age. The scale runs from 0 (comfortable, no itch) to 4 (itches most terribly, impossible to sit still, concentrate). | Patients with Itch Man Score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 90±7 days |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Change in Leuven Itch Scale (patients ≥ 14 years of age) scores taken from two time points, Baseline and Day 90±7 [End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP)]. The Leuven Itch Scale measures six dimensions of the itch experience: Frequency Subscore (0 = Never to 100 = Always); Duration Subscore (0 = Between 0 and 30 minutes to 100 = More than 2 hours); Severity Subscore (0 = No itch to 100 = Worst possible itch); Consequences Subscore [0 = Never to 100 = Always (lower score indicates less negative consequences from the itch)]; Distress Subscore (0 = Not distressing at all to 100 = Very distressing); Surface Area Subscore (0-100, high values indicate more parts of the body are itching) | Patients with Leuven Itch Score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 90±7 days |
|
|
DBP D0 to the last dose of study medication at Month 24 (OLP) ±14 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Oleogel-S10 (DBP) | Oleogel-S10: 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil | 0 | 109 | 7 | 109 | 89 | 109 |
| EG001 | Control Gel (DBP) | Control gel: Vehicle Gel | 0 | 114 | 6 | 114 | 92 | 114 |
| EG002 | Former Oleogel-S10 (OLP) | Oleogel-S10: 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil | 7 | 100 | 26 | 100 | 77 | 100 |
| EG003 | Former Control Gel (OLP) | Oleogel-S10: 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil | 2 | 105 | 24 | 105 | 81 | 105 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Squamous cell carcinoma skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudosyndactyly | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypovolaemic shock | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia/ | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory syncytial virus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematemesis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic function abnormal | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device related infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood loss anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardio-respiratory arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syndactyly | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Talipes | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fissure | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fecaloma | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemmorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemoperitoneum | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal Ischemia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal mucosal blister | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disease progression | General disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blister infected | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device related bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endocarditis staphylococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Klebsiella infection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Klebsiella sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device site infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral herpes | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteomyelitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Otitis externa | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudomonas infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin bacterial infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eschar | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrostomy tube site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laryngeal injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Near drowning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Unintentional medical device removal | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight gain poor | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephropathy | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic congestion | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment | Refers to any AEs under PT "wound complication." These include increase in wound size vs. baseline or previous visit, wound reopening, wound injury, increase in wound burden, worsening of EB wound pain, wound odor, and wound worsening vs baseline. |
|
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection staphylococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin D deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (25.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Boylan | Amryt Research Limited | +3531518 | 0200 | Janet.boylan@amrytpharma.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 9, 2022 | Mar 22, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004820 | Epidermolysis Bullosa |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012868 | Skin Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012872 | Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000631524 | episalvan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 12 to <18 years |
|
| 18 years and older |
|
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
| Unknown |
|
| Not applicable (applies in countries where the collection of race was prohibited) |
|
| Other (applies if none of the races listed were appropriate or if the subject was of mixed race) |
|
| South America |
|
| United States |
|
| Australia |
|
| Georgia |
|
| Hong Kong |
|
| Israel |
|
| Russia |
|
| Singapore |
|
| Ukraine |
|
| DDEB (dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa) |
|
| JEB (junctional epidermolysis bullosa) |
|
| EBS (epidermolysis bullosa simplex) |
|
| Kindler EB |
|
| Superiority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|