Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary aim of this study is to determine if the insertion of a peripheral Internal Jugular (IJ) catheter is faster than a standard of care intravenous (IV)access in patients with difficult access. The secondary aims of this study examine patient discomfort between standard IV insertion vs. peripheral IV insertion as well as a comparison of complication rates between the two methods of insertion. Support for the peripheral IV procedure could provide an option for the thousands of Emergency Department (ED) patients who daily encounter the situation of difficult IV access and the numerous needle pokes that accompany it. Using this procedure may result in greater patient satisfaction and reduced complication rates.
This will be a randomized control trial comparing peripheral IJ to standard care of difficult access patients.
Catheters will be placed by attending physicians and residents (2nd and 3rd years) with experience placing ultrasound guided internal jugular central venous catheters. Because the procedure is identical to the first step of placing an IJ Central Venous Catheter, there is no special training needed for the procedure itself. A video will be created and viewed by all placing the catheters to show the specifics so that there is standardization between individuals.
Attempts to place the peripheral IJ will be limited to two. If not successful after two attempts, the patient will return to 'standard care' and the treatment team will decide on further directions such as ultrasound guided peripheral IV or central venous line.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care (peripheral IV access) | Other | Patient with a history of difficult access or a patient that currently has difficult peripheral IV access. |
|
| Peripheral IJ access | Active Comparator | Patient with a history of difficult access or a patient that currently has difficult peripheral IV access and is randomized into the group that gets peripheral IJ access. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peripheral IV access procedure | Procedure | standard of care guided IV access into peripheral vein excluding IJ |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total time to gain successful IV access | Time to successful IV (or IJ) access in minutes from ED arrival | ED arrival to successful venous access, up to 300 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Venous access complication | Variables: Immediate Complications -noted at time of procedure (hematoma, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, infection, line failure) Delayed complications - noted at time of discharge OR at 2 week chart follow-up (hematoma, pneumothorax, infection, line failure) | Up to 2 weeks after IV placement and/or removal |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Zwank, MD | Regions Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regions Hospital | Saint Paul | Minnesota | 55101 | United States |
We do not plan to share individual personnel data
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This will be a randomized control trial comparing peripheral IJ to standard care of difficult access patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Peripheral IJ access procedure | Procedure | standard of care guided IV access into IJ |
|
| Procedural patient comfort |
Pain-score assessment (10-point Likert scale) |
| Average 5 minutes to 1 hour post procedure |