Comparison of Symptomatic and Radiographic Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair With and Without MatriStem Surgical Matrix
Comparison of Symptomatic and Radiographic Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair With and Without MatriStem Surgical Matrix
This is a prospective, case-matched, systematic follow up of up to 70 pre-existing patients whom underwent paraesophageal hernia repair between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2016. Patients whom are willing to participate in the study will be asked to return for a one time follow up visit to reassess for hiatal hernia recurrence both symptomatically and radiologically to compare the efficacy of the use of MatriStem Surgical Matrix (ACell) mesh to other biologic meshes.
The participating "MatriStem" patients (N=35) will be matched to "control" patients who were treated surgically by Dr. Vic Velanovich or Dr. Michael Albrink for paraesophageal hernia with a biological mesh other than MatriStem Surgical Matrix (N=35) during the study timeframe at Tampa General Hospital. Patients will be matched by age (+ 5 years), gender, and operative approach (laparoscopic, laparotomy, or thoracic approach).
Study participation will require only one visit. Once the patient signs the consent form, operative details and the postoperative course will be reviewed retrospectively.
Visit 1 (≥ 12 months post-PEHR)
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: