Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess changes in meibomian gland function and evaporative dry eye symptoms after treatment with the iLux medical device.
Alcon Research, LLC, acquired TearFilm Innovations, Inc., in December 2018. This study was designed and conducted by TearFilm Innovations, Inc. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by TearFilm Innovations, Inc., to Alcon Research, LLC.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| iLux 2020 System | Experimental | Meibomian gland treatment (Day 0) according to instructions for use (IFU)/User Manual |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iLux 2020 System | Device | Medical device that applies localized heat and pressure therapy to the eyelid in order to express melted meibum from obstructed glands |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Meibomian Gland Secretion (MGS) Total Score | Meibomian glands on the lower eyelid were assessed by the examiner using a Meibomian Gland Evaluator (MGE 1000) device while viewing the eyelid margin with a slit lamp microscope. 5 glands in 3 zones (nasal, medial, temporal) were evaluated. Each gland was scored from 0-3, for a resultant overall score of 0-45 for each eye. MGS scoring was as follows: 0 = no secretion (worst), 1 = inspissated, 2 = cloudy, 3 = clear liquid (best). A positive change value indicates an improvement. Eyes were assessed individually. | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 |
| Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | The investigator instilled a drop of fluorescein into the lower eyelid and asked the patient to blink several times, then stop. The time between the last blink and the first appearance of a dark spot on the cornea (formation of a dry area) on the otherwise continuously stained tear film was recorded in seconds. 3 consecutive measurements were taken, with TBUT defined as the average of the 3 measurements. A positive change value represents A positive change value represents a more stable tear film (improvement). Eyes were assessed individually. | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) Total Score | The Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) survey is a validated survey that assesses both the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. The patient grades the frequency of symptoms (4 items) on a scale from 0 to 3 (0=never; 3=constant) and the severity of each symptom (4 items) on a scale from 0 to 4 (0=no problems; 4=intolerable). Responses to the 8 items are summed to calculate a total score ranging from 0 to 28, where 0=best and 28=worst. A negative change value indicates a perceived improvement in ocular health. Both eyes contributed to the mean. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TearFilm Investigative Site | Encinitas | California | 92924 | United States | ||
| TearFilm Investigative Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34620785 | Derived | Schanzlin D, Owen JP, Klein S, Yeh TN, Merchea MM, Bullimore MA. Efficacy of the Systane iLux Thermal Pulsation System for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction After 1 Week and 1 Month: A Prospective Study. Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Apr 1;48(4):155-161. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000847. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This reporting group includes all enrolled participants.
Participants were recruited from 3 investigative sites located in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | iLux 2020 System | Meibomian gland treatment (Day 0) according to instructions for use (IFU)/User Manual |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | iLux 2020 System | Meibomian gland treatment (Day 0) according to instructions for use (IFU)/User Manual |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Meibomian Gland Secretion (MGS) Total Score | Meibomian glands on the lower eyelid were assessed by the examiner using a Meibomian Gland Evaluator (MGE 1000) device while viewing the eyelid margin with a slit lamp microscope. 5 glands in 3 zones (nasal, medial, temporal) were evaluated. Each gland was scored from 0-3, for a resultant overall score of 0-45 for each eye. MGS scoring was as follows: 0 = no secretion (worst), 1 = inspissated, 2 = cloudy, 3 = clear liquid (best). A positive change value indicates an improvement. Eyes were assessed individually. | All treated with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 | eyes | eyes |
|
Adverse event data was collected for each participant from time of enrollment until time of study exit, approximately 4 weeks.
An adverse event was defined as any untoward and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational drug or device, or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of the suspected cause. All subjects exposed to the study treatment were evaluated for adverse events.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | iLux 2020 System | Meibomian Gland Treatment iLux 2020 System: Heating and compression to express clogged meibomian glands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior CDMA Project Lead, CDMA Ocular Health | Alcon Research, LLC | 1-888-451-3937 | alcon.medinfo@alcon.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015352 | Dry Eye Syndromes |
| D000080343 | Meibomian Gland Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007766 | Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D005141 | Eyelid Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 |
| Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score | The OSDI is a validated, 12-item questionnaire used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision. The patient grades each item on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 is "None" and 4 is "All of the Time." Responses to the 12 items are summed, and a formula is used to calculate a total score from 0 to 100, where 0 corresponds to no disability and 100 corresponds to complete disability. A negative change value represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. Both eyes contributed to the mean. | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Month 1 |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92122 |
| United States |
| TearFilm Investigative Site | San Diego | California | 92128 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) | The investigator instilled a drop of fluorescein into the lower eyelid and asked the patient to blink several times, then stop. The time between the last blink and the first appearance of a dark spot on the cornea (formation of a dry area) on the otherwise continuously stained tear film was recorded in seconds. 3 consecutive measurements were taken, with TBUT defined as the average of the 3 measurements. A positive change value represents A positive change value represents a more stable tear film (improvement). Eyes were assessed individually. | All treated with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) Total Score | The Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) survey is a validated survey that assesses both the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. The patient grades the frequency of symptoms (4 items) on a scale from 0 to 3 (0=never; 3=constant) and the severity of each symptom (4 items) on a scale from 0 to 4 (0=no problems; 4=intolerable). Responses to the 8 items are summed to calculate a total score ranging from 0 to 28, where 0=best and 28=worst. A negative change value indicates a perceived improvement in ocular health. Both eyes contributed to the mean. | All treated with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Week 1, Month 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score | The OSDI is a validated, 12-item questionnaire used to measure ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect a patient's vision. The patient grades each item on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 is "None" and 4 is "All of the Time." Responses to the 12 items are summed, and a formula is used to calculate a total score from 0 to 100, where 0 corresponds to no disability and 100 corresponds to complete disability. A negative change value represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. Both eyes contributed to the mean. | All treated with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (Day 0 pretreatment), Month 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
Not provided
Not provided
| t-test, 2 sided |
Statistical significance is set at α = 0.05. |
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |
| t-test, 2 sided |
Statistical significance is set at α = 0.025. |
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |