Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Data collection issues from the electronic health record.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Society for Technology in Anesthesia | UNKNOWN |
| University of Miami | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of a hydraulically coupled twitch monitor compared to the EMG twitch monitor in current use to measure the extent of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Neuromuscular blockade (paralysis) is necessary for many surgical procedures to provide optimal surgical conditions. The extent of paralysis typically assessed during routine clinical care by examining the muscle response of the thumb ("twitch") following delivery of a series of the "train-of-four".
Quantitative assessment of neuromuscular block can be assessed using electromyography (EMG) This technique measures action potential in the muscles of the thumb.
The proposed method is a simple technique that can constructed with equipment that is readily available in most operating rooms. If validated, it would provide a simple method to assess quantitatively the extent of neuromuscular blockade and recovery of muscle strength.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulic Monitoring Device | Experimental | Monitoring device to be compared to electromyographic (EMG) device in the same patient; measures depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia based on the pressure exerted by the muscles of the thumb. |
|
| Standard EMG Monitoring Device | Active Comparator | Currently used standard monitoring device; measures depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia based on the action potential of the muscles of the thumb. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulic Monitoring Device | Device | The hydraulic monitoring device externally measures the pressure associated with thumb strength applied to the device to determine the depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. This will be compared to measurements using a current monitoring device in the same patient. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of Hydraulic Twitch Monitoring Device in Measuring Neuromuscular Blockade as Compared to EMG Monitoring Device, Assessed using Repeated Measures Bland-Altman Analysis | To determine the accuracy (bias and precision) of a the monitoring device as compared to the electromyographic (EMG) monitor in measuring the extent of neuromuscular blockade in subjects undergoing general anesthesia. | 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Epstein, MD | University of Miami | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Anesthesiology at University of Miami Hospital | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1952146 | Result | Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual assessment of train-of-four and double burst-induced fade at submaximal stimulating currents. Anesth Analg. 1991 Nov;73(5):627-32. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199111000-00020. | |
| 4037404 | Result | Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbaek J, Ording H, Skovgaard LT, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B. Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1985 Oct;63(4):440-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198510000-00015. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standard EMG Monitoring Device | Device | Standard and in current usage, the electromyographic monitoring (EMG) device externally measures the action potential of the muscles of the thumb to determine the depth of neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. This will be used as the clinical monitoring device and as a comparator. |
|
| 20442261 | Result | Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):129-40. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da8312. Epub 2010 May 4. |
| 4254032 | Result | Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray TC. Quantitative assessment of residual antidepolarizing block. II. Br J Anaesth. 1971 May;43(5):478-85. doi: 10.1093/bja/43.5.478. No abstract available. |
| 10754616 | Result | Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014. |
| 9105219 | Result | Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997 Apr;86(4):765-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199704000-00005. |
| 9366453 | Result | Eriksson LI, Sundman E, Olsson R, Nilsson L, Witt H, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R. Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans: simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997 Nov;87(5):1035-43. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199711000-00005. |
| 9366929 | Result | Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Krintel JJ. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Oct;41(9):1095-1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x. |