Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. Term Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. Hypersensitivity was the pre-defined TEAE of special Interest for this study. The percentage of participants with treatment emergent AESIs (hypersensitivity) were reported.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).

Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Percentage of participants with positive anti-Drug antibodies (ADAs) status to Adalimumab were reported.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

Titer was defined as the degree to which the antibody-serum sample could be diluted and still contained detectable amounts of antibody. Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) titers for adalimumab was reported. Data was collected using validated bioanalytical method.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

Percentage of participants with confirmed neutralizing antibodies status to Adalimumab were reported.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable at specified time points.

The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

The ACR 50 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=50 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

The ACR 70 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=70 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

DAS calculated on 28 joints is composite score derived from 4 measures: number of swollen joints (out of 28), number of tender joints (out of 28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on visual analog scale (VAS). Overall disease activity score DAS28 was derived using following formulas from DAS28:DAS28=0.56*√(TJC28)+0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*GH+0.70*ln(ESR). Where: TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness, SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling, ln(ESR) = natural log of ESR, GH = general health component of DAS (ie, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1-100 where 100 is maximal activity); For analyses, GH divided by 10 & converted to 0.5 scale, i.e, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5. DAS28-ESR of >5.1 implies active disease, <3.2 low disease activity, & <2.6 remission. Change of 1.2(twice measurement error)=significant change of disease activity state. Overall score ranges from 0-10 where higher score means more severe disease.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

Disease Activity Score calculated on 28 joints is composite score derived from 4 measures: number of swollen joints (out of 28), -number of tender joints (out of 28), -Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), -Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on visual analog scale (VAS). Overall disease activity score DAS28 was derived using following formulas from DAS28: DAS28=0.56*√(TJC28)+0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*GH+0.70*ln(ESR). Where: -TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness, -SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling, -ln(ESR) = natural logarithm of ESR, -GH = general health component of DAS (ie, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity); For analyses, GH was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5. DAS28-ESR of >5.1 implies active disease, <3.2 low disease activity, and <2.6 remission.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

SDAI is numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: tender & swollen joint count (based on 28-joint assessment), Patient's & Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) & level of C-reactive protein (CRP)(milligram per deciliter (mg/dL), normal<1 mg/dL). SDAI was calculated based on following formula: SDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28)+GH+PGA+CRP Where: -GH =general health component of DAS (i.e. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity; For analyses, GH was divided by 10 & converted to 0.5 scale (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5).-PGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity. For analyses, PGA will be divided by 10 & converted to 0.5 scale (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5). where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc. The total score range is 0-86 & lower score indicates less disease activity.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA. Where, -GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity; for analyses, GH was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 etc. where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc.). -PGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity. For analyses, PGA was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, ie, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 etc. where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc. The CDAI ranges from 0 to 76. Lower score indicates less disease activity.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

According to Boolean-based definition of remission of ACR/EULAR, a participant must satisfy all of the following: tender joint count <= 1, swollen joint count <= 1, CRP <= 1 mg/dL, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity <= 1 (0 to 10 VAS). PGA was assessed on a 10 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), where higher scores indicate worse health condition.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

Adverse event(AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious adverse event(SAE) was AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Term TEAE is defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. All abnormal physical examinations occurring during the study have been reported as Adverse events. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Vital signs including body temperature, respiratory rate, and heart rate (after 5-minute rest) were measured. Percentage of participants with clinically meaningful abnormalities in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningful was determined by the investigator.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Laboratory parameters including hematology, urinalysis, and biochemistry analysis were analyzed.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with clinically significant abnormal values for 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at week 12, 24, and 52 were reported.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

For ANA, positivity is defined as any participant with ANA titer greater than (>) 1:160 and negativity is defined as ANA titer less than (<) 1:160. For anti-ds DNA, positivity is defined as any participant with adsDNA > 15 units per milliliter (U/mL), intermediate category is defined as value between 10 U/mL to 15 U/mL and negativity is defined as adsDNA < 10 U/mL. Percentage of participants with anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (Anti-dsDNA) at baseline, week 24 and 52 were reported.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported questionnaire that is commonly used in RA to measure disease associated disability (assessment of physical function). It consists of several questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. HAQ-DI scores range from 0 to 3. The disability section of the questionnaire scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated 36-item, patient-reported indication of overall health status not specific to any age, disease or Treatment group. The SF-36 questionnaire contains 36 questions pertaining to eight subscales of health status. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) is based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of physical functioning).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The participant was asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of the individual based on the UK scoring algorithm.

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

EQ-5D-5L: Standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of participant's health state 5 dimensions:

mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. Responses to 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (worst health state) to 1 (better health state). EQ-VAS: Self-rated health status using a vertical VAS. EQ-VAS records participant's perceptions of their own current overall health in range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

ITT Analysis Set included all participants randomly allocated to a treatment, based on intent to treat "as randomized" principle (planned treatment regimen rather than actual treatment given in case of any difference). Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

The participant's reported perception of pain was measured on a VAS where the slash drawn by the participant represents pain of increasing intensity. VAS score ranges from 0-10 millimeter [mm], where; 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain. The first 2 injections was administered by qualified personnel. The next three doses of IMP (3-5) will be self-administered by the participant and injection site pain was assessed. Pain was recorded immediately after, 15 minutes after, and 1 hour after the injections received by the participants.

The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "Number analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.