Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, eligible subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds will be treated with Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine and will return for follow-up assessments 2, 4, 24 and 36 weeks after the treatment. A Touch-up treatment may be done at Week 2, if deemed appropriate by the investigator.
This is a prospective, open label, multicenter, post-market investigation. Following informed consent and screening, eligible subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds will be treated with Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine, and will return for follow-up assessments 2, 4, 24 and 36 weeks after the treatment. A Touch-up treatment may be done at Week 2, if deemed appropriate by the investigator. The performance of the investigational device will be evaluated by the investigator by assessing severity of nasolabial folds using the Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) (4, 24 and 36 weeks after the treatment and in comparison to Day 0), global aesthetic improvement (4, 24 and 36 weeks after the treatment). The subject will evaluate pain intensity associated with the treatment (at Day 0 and at Week 2 (if Touch-up treatment occurred)), and satisfaction with the treatment 4, 24 and 36 weeks after the treatment.
The safety will be evaluated based on occurrence of adverse events, which will be collected throughout the investigation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine | Other | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine is administered by injection into the deep dermis or subcutis. The volume applied depends on the size of the area which requires correction and will be selected by the investigator, but will not exceed 10 mL in total per treatment. A single application, with optional Touch-up treatment after two weeks, if the desired level of correction has not been achieved with the initial applicatio |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine | Device | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine injections up to 10 ml given to the patients at baseline, and touch-up at week 2, if applicable |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change | The average change versus baseline in the NLF-SRS grade of nasolabial folds at Week 24 as evaluated by the investigator. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | 24 weeks |
| NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point at week 24 versus baseline. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change - Other Timepoints | The average change versus baseline in the NLF-SRS grade of nasolabial folds at Week 4 and Week 36 as evaluated by the investigator. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | Week 4, Week 36 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Events | Occurrence and frequency of adverse events | From day 0 until patient last visit / week 36 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University Graz | Graz | Austria | ||||
| MÄZ WIEN Medizinisch Ästhetisches Zentrum Wien |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
62 subjects were screened and enrolled.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine: Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine injections up to 10 ml given to the patients at baseline, and touch-up at week 2, if applicable |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
62 screened subjects were treated at least once with the investigational medical device and were included in the SAF.
62 subjects had at least one post-treatment assessment and at least one NLF severity assessment based on the NLF-SRS and were included in the ITT population.
One subject terminated the investigation early after Week 4 due to a clinical investigation plan (CIP) deviation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine: Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine injections up to 10 ml given to the patients at baseline, and touch-up at week 2, if applicable |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change | The average change versus baseline in the NLF-SRS grade of nasolabial folds at Week 24 as evaluated by the investigator. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | ITT - Intent to treat Population - as defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 weeks |
|
36 weeks - Up to 36 weeks after treatment (Day 0)
AEs will be detected at each visit by clinical examination and by asking the subject about the occurrence of AEs. Care should be taken not to introduce bias when eliciting AE information from the subject. In addition, the subjects will be instructed to immediately contact the investigator/study site in case of occurrence of any untoward event between visits.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine | Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine: Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine injections up to 10 ml given to the patients at baseline, and touch-up at week 2, if applicable |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| injection site hypoaesthesia | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of Clinical Operations | CROMA - PHARMA | +43 0226268468 | clinical.studies@croma.at |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 31, 2016 | Dec 13, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 15, 2016 | Dec 13, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine for the correction of nasolabial folds
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction- Other Timepoints | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point at week 4 and week 36 versus baseline | week 4, week 36 |
| Aesthetic Improvement | The proportion of subjects with aesthetic improvement at Week 4, Week 24 and Week 36, as evaluated by the investigator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | week 4, week 24, week 36 |
| Subjects' Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome | Subjects' satisfaction rate with aesthetic outcome of the treatment at Week 4, Week 24 and Week 36, as evaluated by the subject | week 4, week 24, week 36 |
| Pain Intensity | The average pain intensity during and after the treatment, as evaluated by the subject using an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), where 0= no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable, immediately after the last injection and 15 minutes thereafter. Lower scores represent better outcomes (less pain). Higher scores represent worse outcomes (more pain). | Day 1, Day 15 |
| NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction- Imaging Independent Reviewer | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point versus Baseline at Week 24 as evaluated by the independent reviewer of photographs. | Week 24 |
| Vienna |
| Austria |
| Ordination Dr. Rudolf Bartsch und Dr. Katrin Bartsch | Vienna | Austria |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point at week 24 versus baseline. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | ITT - Intent to treat Population - as defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change - Other Timepoints | The average change versus baseline in the NLF-SRS grade of nasolabial folds at Week 4 and Week 36 as evaluated by the investigator. The Croma NLF-SRS is a validated, 5-point scale ranging from Grade 0 (none or minimal) to Grade 4 (extreme), therefore a reduction in value, represents an improvement on an aesthetical perspective | ITT - Intent to treat Population - as defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 4, Week 36 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction- Other Timepoints | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point at week 4 and week 36 versus baseline | ITT - Intent to treat Population - as defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | week 4, week 36 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Aesthetic Improvement | The proportion of subjects with aesthetic improvement at Week 4, Week 24 and Week 36, as evaluated by the investigator using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | ITT - Intent to treat Population - as defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | week 4, week 24, week 36 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjects' Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome | Subjects' satisfaction rate with aesthetic outcome of the treatment at Week 4, Week 24 and Week 36, as evaluated by the subject | ITT - Intend to Treat Population as defined in the Baseline Analysis Population description. The results below reflect the subjects who rated their satisfaction with the treatment as 'very satisfied'. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | week 4, week 24, week 36 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pain Intensity | The average pain intensity during and after the treatment, as evaluated by the subject using an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), where 0= no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable, immediately after the last injection and 15 minutes thereafter. Lower scores represent better outcomes (less pain). Higher scores represent worse outcomes (more pain). | ITT - Intent to treat Population - defined in Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Day 1, Day 15 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Reduction- Imaging Independent Reviewer | The proportion of subjects with the NLF-SRS grade reduced by ≥1 point versus Baseline at Week 24 as evaluated by the independent reviewer of photographs. | ITT- Intent to treat population - As defined in the Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Safety Events | Occurrence and frequency of adverse events | SAF - as defined in the Baseline Analysis Population Description | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From day 0 until patient last visit / week 36 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 12 |
| 62 |
| Injection site pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site haematoma | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| influenza | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| lice infestation | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| rhinitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| synovitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| polyneuropathy | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| syncope | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
| Week 36 |
|
|
|
| Week 36 |
|
|
|
| Baseline - Change from initial assessment to second assessment |
|
|
| Week 2 /Touch up - Initial Assessment (right after injection) |
|
|
| Week 2 /Touch up - Second Assessment ( 15 min after injection) |
|
|
| Week 2/ touch up - Change from initial assessment to second assessment |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Adverse Device Effect - Syncope |
|
| Influenza |
|
| Lice Infestation |
|
| Rhinitis |
|
| Urinary tract infection |
|
| Ligament sprain |
|
| Synovitis |
|
| Polyneuropathy |
|