Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UC4DK108611 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
| Medtronic | INDUSTRY |
| Jaeb Center for Health Research | OTHER |
| Schneider Children's Medical Center, Israel |
Not provided
Not provided
Adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes often have a difficult time achieving good glucose control, which is so important in reducing the risk for diabetes complications. Despite the use of multiple daily injections or insulin pumps and glucose sensors, there is still a need for many individuals to further improve glucose levels without causing low blood glucose levels (hypoglycemia) or adding to the daily burden of living with diabetes. Today an insulin pump can receive glucose readings from a continuous glucose monitor and adjust the insulin delivery in an attempt to keep glucose levels in a more optimal range. These systems are called hybrid closed loop (HCL). This means that much of the insulin delivery is automated, yet the patient still interacts regularly with the system, particularly to help determine the insulin dose to deliver to cover a meal. Results of early studies using HCL systems in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes are encouraging.
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the automated insulin delivery (AID) system with proportional integral-derivative (PID) algorithm (Minimed 670G 3.0 HCL) to an AID system with combined PID and Fuzzy Logic Algorithm (Minimed 670G 4.0 Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL)). The trial will test the hypothesis that the Minimed AHCL can reduce daytime hyperglycemia, currently the biggest challenge for AID systems, without increasing hypoglycemia.
Up to 124 adolescents and young adults (ages 14-<30) will be recruited to test each system for three months in a randomized crossover trial. Investigators will compare how effective each hybrid closed loop system is at preventing high blood glucose readings during the day. The investigators will also evaluate the safety of each system and how participants adjust to the daily use of the technology.
Purpose of the study: A randomized crossover trial involving up to four clinical sites in the United States and three sites outside the US (Germany, Israel and Slovenia) will compare the efficacy and safety of an AID system with a PID algorithm versus an AID system with a PID algorithm enhanced with a fuzzy logic algorithm.
Study Objectives:
EFFICACY: The co-primary outcomes are difference in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-measured metrics between periods:
KEY SAFETY OUTCOMES:
Study design: Randomized crossover trial with two 12-week crossover periods in automode, preceded by a run-in phase.
Population: A maximum of 124 individuals may be enrolled and start the run-in phase. Approximately 112 are expected to enter the crossover trial, with a goal of at least 100 people completing the trial.
Maximum duration of a study for a subject: Approximately 28-36 weeks.
Recruitment: Subjects will be recruited through the clinical sites.
Consent: Written consent/assent will be obtained for all subjects and/or guardians, in accordance with human subjects and regulatory requirements.
Screening Assessments:
Study Training:
Run-In Period: (2-8 weeks)
* Eligible participants will use the study 670G 3.0 HCL pump during the run-in. Participants who were pump users at screening may skip the Pump Run-In period (but must participate in the Pump+CGM Run-In period) per investigator discretion. 670G auto mode users may use the 670G pump in auto mode.
Screening and start of run-in training visits may occur on the same day or separate days, but no more than 14 days apart.
Standardized pump training will be provided to study participants and their diabetes care partners (for participants <18 years old). The study team will assist the participant in study pump infusion site initiation and will start the participant on the study pump. For current pump users, the study pump will be programmed with the participants usual basal rates and pump parameters. The participants personal pump will be removed. Participants may continue to use their personal CGM if applicable.
The pump will be used for at least two weeks during the Pump Run-In, with the option of repeating Pump Run-In for an additional two weeks per investigator discretion. Contact will be made each week with additional contacts as needed. Prior to each contact, participants will be asked to upload device data for study staff to review.
After completion of Pump Run-In, participants will proceed to use the study CGM along with the study 670G HCL pump during the Pump+CGM Run-In period.
* Pump+CGM Run-In (670G 3.0 HCL + Guardian Sensor (3)) All participants must complete a two-week run-in period with the use of the study pump and CGM before being randomized into the crossover trial. During Pump+CGM Run-In, the predictive low glucose suspend feature will be turned on and auto mode will be off (i.e. manual mode). Participants who were 670G auto mode users at screening may use the pump in auto mode.
Standardized device training will be provided to study participants and their diabetes care partners (for participants <18 years old). Personal pumps and CGMs will be removed during the Pump+CGM Run-In period as applicable.
Contact will be made each week with additional contacts as needed. Prior to each contact, participants will be asked to upload device data for study staff to review.
Run-In Assessment Successful completion of Pump Run-In is per investigator discretion. Pump Run-In may be repeated once.
Successful completion of the Pump+CGM Run-In requires CGM data to be collected on at least 80% of the possible time in the prior 14 days of use. An average of at least three blood glucose meter (BGM) tests per day also will be required. If these are not achieved, the Pump+CGM Run-In period may be repeated once.
Randomization into the Crossover Trial
Eligible participants who successfully complete the Pump+CGM Run-In will be randomly assigned to begin with one Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) system during Period 1 and then crossover to the other AID system during Period 2. The two study AID systems (treatments) are:
Home Use of AID System during the Crossover Trial Period 1 (~13 weeks) Participants and their diabetes care partners (for participants <18 years old) will be trained by qualified personnel on the use of the assigned pump and on auto mode feature use including meal announcement, meal bolusing, and exercise.
Training will also be provided in performing specific tasks including the following:
Study staff will discuss the visit and contact schedule with the participant and will make arrangements for follow-up appointments. Participants will be asked to upload data before each contact and at least every two weeks.
After auto mode training has been completed, participants will proceed with home use of the AID system (meaning free-living use at work, home, etc.) during Period 1 with either the 670G 3.0 HCL or 670G 4.0 AHCL pump. The predictive low glucose suspend feature will be on.
The system will initially be used with auto mode deactivated (except for 670G auto mode users at screening who may activate auto mode if using the 670G 3.0 HCL pump) until participants are contacted 6-10 days into Period 1 with instructions to activate auto mode. Participants will be instructed to obtain an overnight fingerstick blood glucose measurement (between 2-3AM) for 2-3 nights following auto mode initiation and if fingerstick blood glucose is <70 mg/dL to treat with carbohydrate. Participants will then continue using the AID system for 12 weeks after auto mode is initialized.
Participants will be expected to use auto mode at all times at home with some exceptions (e.g. times of illness, acetaminophen use).
Participants on the 670G 4.0 AHCL will begin with an auto mode target glucose set point of 120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L) that may be lowered to 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) if participant meets the safety criteria per protocol and investigator discretion.
HbA1c, C-peptide, and glucose levels will be collected for central lab analysis at the beginning of Study Period 1. Human Factors and Diabetes Technology Attitude Surveys will be administered at the end of Study Period 1.
Period 2 (~13 weeks) At the beginning of Period 2, a urine pregnancy test will be completed as applicable. Eligible participants will then use the other AID system during Period 2. The procedures in Period 1 will be repeated in Period 2.
At the end of the 12-weeks of AID use in auto mode at home, the participant will complete a final study visit. That visit may be completed in-person in clinic or in an alternate location such as the participant's home. The study visit may occur remotely via phone or videoconferencing. Certain procedures, such as the measurement of height, weight, vitals, and collection of the central HbA1c sample, may be missed if the visit is not completed in-person. Participants requiring a remote final visit will be transitioned off of the study device during the remote contact and an arrangement will be made between site staff and the participant to return all required study devices either in-person or via mail.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PID Algorithm | Active Comparator | Participants will receive insulin delivered by the Medtronic Minimed 670G 3.0 HCL system using a PID algorithm.. |
|
| PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm | Experimental | Participants will receive insulin delivered by the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed loop system (Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL) with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedtronicMinimed 670G 3.0 hybrid closed loop system | Device | The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Time Glucose Levels Were > 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) From 6 AM to 11:59 PM | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Non-inferiority for Percent of Time <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) During the Entire 24-hour Period. | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy: CGM Derived Indices: Mean Glucose Only | Continuous Glucose Monitoring derived indices over the first 84 days of each treatment period for 24 hours (excluding time before auto mode is turned on). Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data for Mean glucose. | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of Total Insulin at Daytime, Nighttime and Post-meal | Based on sensor glucose data | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Human Factors and Diabetes Technology Attitude and Human Factors Questionnaires |
Inclusion Criteria:
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (as diagnosed clinically) for at least one year
Age 14-<30 years at enrollment
For females, not currently known to be pregnant, be breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant within the study duration.
Using an insulin pump or multiple daily injections of insulin
HbA1c from an approved HbA1c point of care analyzer with a value 7.0%-11.0%
Willingness or ability to do carbohydrate counting
In the investigator's judgment, able to understand and likely to be adherent to the protocol
For subjects <18 years old, living with one or more diabetes care partners (eg.g. parent/legal guardian), of whom at least one is committed to participating in study training for emergency procedures for severe hypoglycemia and able to contact the participant in case of an emergency.
Have adequate internet access and a computer system that meets requirements for uploading data.
For participants currently using CGM or insulin pump, willingness to discontinue personal CGM and pump when using the study CGM and pumps (note: including implantable CGMs).
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at screening will be excluded from study participation:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Bergenstal, MD | International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Moshe Phillip, MD | Schneider Children's Medical Center, Israel | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University | New Haven | Connecticut | 06510 | United States | ||
| University of Florida |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20587585 | Background | Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, Buse JB, Dailey G, Davis SN, Joyce C, Peoples T, Perkins BA, Welsh JB, Willi SM, Wood MA; STAR 3 Study Group. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):311-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002853. Epub 2010 Jun 29. | |
| 23445093 | Background | Phillip M, Battelino T, Atlas E, Kordonouri O, Bratina N, Miller S, Biester T, Stefanija MA, Muller I, Nimri R, Danne T. Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):824-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206881. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
13 participants were not randomized from the 126 enrolled due to ineligibility or lost to follow up.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PID Algorithm First, Then PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic Minimed 670G 3.0 HCL system using a PID algorithm with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. MedtronicMinimed 670G 3.0 hybrid closed loop system: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
| FG001 | PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm First, Then PID Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed loop system (Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL) with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. Medtronic Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor.: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID + Fuzzy Logic) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PID Algorithm First, Then PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic Minimed 670G 3.0 HCL system using a PID algorithm with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. MedtronicMinimed 670G 3.0 hybrid closed loop system: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Time Glucose Levels Were > 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) From 6 AM to 11:59 PM | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of time | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
Post-randomization through study completion, an average of 26-weeks
All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PID Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic Minimed 670G 3.0 HCL system using a PID algorithm with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. MedtronicMinimed 670G 3.0 hybrid closed loop system: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe Hypoglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperglycemia or Ketosis Related to Insulin Pump Problem (without diabetic ketoacidosis) | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Becker LaFrance, Sr. Manager, Research Project Management Office | HealthPartners Institute | 952.967.5079 | Amy.B.LaFrance@healthpartners.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 17, 2020 | Jan 5, 2021 | Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 10, 2020 | Jan 5, 2021 | SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 17, 2019 | May 29, 2020 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Ljubljana | OTHER |
| Yale University | OTHER |
| Joslin Diabetes Center | OTHER |
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| Stanford University | OTHER |
| International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet | OTHER |
| Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult | OTHER |
| University of Minnesota | OTHER |
Randomized crossover trial with two 12-week crossover periods in auto mode preceded by a run-in phase.
Not provided
Not provided
Open label
Not provided
| Medtronic Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. | Device | The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID + Fuzzy Logic) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
|
| Efficacy: CGM Derived Indices |
CGM derived indices over the first 84 days of each treatment period for 24 hours. Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data for coefficient of variation; percentage of sensor glucose readings in the range of 70 to 180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) and 70 to 140 mg/dL (3.9 to 7.8 mmol/L); percentage of sensor glucose readings >180 mg/dL (daytime is a co-primary outcome) and >250 mg/dL (10.0 and 13.9 mmol/L, respectively) |
| 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Efficacy: Amount of Total, Basal and Bolus Daily Insulin Over the First 84 Days of Each Treatment Period | Amount of total, basal, and bolus daily insulin over the first 84 days of each treatment period (excluding time before auto mode is turned on) for 24 hours. Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data. Sum of daytime and nighttime values may not equal total daily values due to rounding. | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Efficacy: HbA1c | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at a central laboratory (Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory University of Minnesota, MN, USA) at randomization and at the end of each period by use of an International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine aligned method (Tosoh HPLC Glycohemoglobin Analyzer, Tosoh Medics, San Francisco, CA, USA; coefficient of variation range 1.4 1.9%). | Time Frame: End of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
| Efficacy: BMI for Participants Age ≥18 Years | Height and weight. Body mass index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories. These categories are the same for men and women of all body types and ages. Below 18.5 : Underweight; 18.5 - 24.9: Normal or Healthy Weight; 25.0 - 29.9: Overweight; 30.0 and Above: Obese. | Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); randomization (Week 2 through 8, depending); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
| Efficacy: BMI Percentile for Participants Age <18 Years | Height and weight based on CDC standards of measurement. Age and gender adjusted. | Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); randomization (Week 2 through 8, depending); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
| Key Safety Outcome 1) Percentage of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Were <54 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL (3.0 and 3.9 mmol/L, Respectively | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Key Safety Outcome 2) Number of DKA Events | DKA as defined by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and described below:
| 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
| Key Safety Outcome 3) Number of Severe Hypoglycemia Events | Severe hypoglycemia event as defined by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and described below: The event required assistance of another person due to altered consciousness, and required another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. This means that the participant was impaired cognitively to the point that he/she was unable to treat himself/herself, was unable to verbalize his/ her needs, was incoherent, disoriented, and/or combative, or experienced seizure or loss of consciousness. | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
Surveys completed by participants. The Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey is 15 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The Diabetes Distress Scale is 17 items on a 1-6 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more distress. The Hypoglycemia Confidence Survey is 8 items on a 1-4 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more confidence. The Diabetes Technology Attitudes Survey is 5 items on a 0-4 scale; Total score calculated as sum of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with diabetes technology. The Adult INSPIRE Survey is 22 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with AID. The Adolescent INSPIRE Survey is 17 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with AID.
| Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
| Gainesville |
| Florida |
| 32611 |
| United States |
| Joslin Diabetes Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| International Diabetes Center | Saint Louis Park | Minnesota | 55416 | United States |
| Kinderkrankenhaus Auf Der Bult | Hanover | 30173 | Germany |
| Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel | Petah Tikva | 4920235 | Israel |
| University of Ljubljana | Ljubljana | Slovenia |
| 23789889 | Background | Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, Bode BW, Meredith M, Slover RH, Ahmann AJ, Welsh JB, Lee SW, Kaufman FR; ASPIRE In-Home Study Group. Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303576. Epub 2013 Jun 22. |
| 25078901 | Background | Nimri R, Muller I, Atlas E, Miller S, Fogel A, Bratina N, Kordonouri O, Battelino T, Danne T, Phillip M. MD-Logic overnight control for 6 weeks of home use in patients with type 1 diabetes: randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov;37(11):3025-32. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0835. Epub 2014 Jul 30. |
| 24937038 | Background | Nimri R, Phillip M. Artificial pancreas: fuzzy logic and control of glycemia. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014 Aug;21(4):251-6. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000073. |
| 23944875 | Background | Nimri R, Muller I, Atlas E, Miller S, Kordonouri O, Bratina N, Tsioli C, Stefanija MA, Danne T, Battelino T, Phillip M. Night glucose control with MD-Logic artificial pancreas in home setting: a single blind, randomized crossover trial-interim analysis. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12071. Epub 2013 Aug 15. |
| 27629148 | Background | Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Tamborlane WV, Kaufman FR. Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1407-1408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11708. No abstract available. |
| 27981804 | Background | Nimri R, Bratina N, Kordonouri O, Avbelj Stefanija M, Fath M, Biester T, Muller I, Atlas E, Miller S, Fogel A, Phillip M, Danne T, Battelino T. MD-Logic overnight type 1 diabetes control in home settings: A multicentre, multinational, single blind randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Apr;19(4):553-561. doi: 10.1111/dom.12852. Epub 2017 Jan 19. |
| 35848991 | Derived | Dovc K, Battelino T, Beck RW, Sibayan J, Bailey RJ, Calhoun P, Turcotte C, Weinzimer S, Smigoc Schweiger D, Nimri R, Bergenstal RM. Impact of Temporary Glycemic Target Use in the Hybrid and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Nov;24(11):848-852. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0153. Epub 2022 Aug 9. |
| 34270328 | Derived | Hood KK, Laffel LM, Danne T, Nimri R, Weinzimer SA, Sibayan J, Bailey RJ, Schatz D, Bratina N, Bello R, Punel A, Calhoun P, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Phillip M. Lived Experience of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Hybrid Closed-Loop: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Perspectives. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Dec;23(12):857-861. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0153. Epub 2021 Oct 26. |
| 33453783 | Derived | Bergenstal RM, Nimri R, Beck RW, Criego A, Laffel L, Schatz D, Battelino T, Danne T, Weinzimer SA, Sibayan J, Johnson ML, Bailey RJ, Calhoun P, Carlson A, Isganaitis E, Bello R, Albanese-O'Neill A, Dovc K, Biester T, Weyman K, Hood K, Phillip M; FLAIR Study Group. A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):208-219. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32514-9. |
| BG001 | PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm First, Then PID Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed loop system (Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL) with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. Medtronic Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor.: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID + Fuzzy Logic) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm |
Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed loop system (Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL) with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. Medtronic Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor.: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID + Fuzzy Logic) and Guardian Sensor (3). |
|
|
| Primary | Non-inferiority for Percent of Time <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) During the Entire 24-hour Period. | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of time | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: CGM Derived Indices: Mean Glucose Only | Continuous Glucose Monitoring derived indices over the first 84 days of each treatment period for 24 hours (excluding time before auto mode is turned on). Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data for Mean glucose. | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/dL | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: CGM Derived Indices | CGM derived indices over the first 84 days of each treatment period for 24 hours. Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data for coefficient of variation; percentage of sensor glucose readings in the range of 70 to 180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) and 70 to 140 mg/dL (3.9 to 7.8 mmol/L); percentage of sensor glucose readings >180 mg/dL (daytime is a co-primary outcome) and >250 mg/dL (10.0 and 13.9 mmol/L, respectively) | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of sensor glucose readings | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: Amount of Total, Basal and Bolus Daily Insulin Over the First 84 Days of Each Treatment Period | Amount of total, basal, and bolus daily insulin over the first 84 days of each treatment period (excluding time before auto mode is turned on) for 24 hours. Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data. Sum of daytime and nighttime values may not equal total daily values due to rounding. | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | insulin units | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: HbA1c | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at a central laboratory (Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory University of Minnesota, MN, USA) at randomization and at the end of each period by use of an International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine aligned method (Tosoh HPLC Glycohemoglobin Analyzer, Tosoh Medics, San Francisco, CA, USA; coefficient of variation range 1.4 1.9%). | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of HbA1c | Time Frame: End of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: BMI for Participants Age ≥18 Years | Height and weight. Body mass index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories. These categories are the same for men and women of all body types and ages. Below 18.5 : Underweight; 18.5 - 24.9: Normal or Healthy Weight; 25.0 - 29.9: Overweight; 30.0 and Above: Obese. | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. An additional two participants from the PID Algorithm group and an additional three participants from the PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm group were not included in this outcome due to missing data. Separate BMI outcomes were reported for participants age ≥18 years and age <18 years due to differing units of measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 | Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); randomization (Week 2 through 8, depending); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Efficacy: BMI Percentile for Participants Age <18 Years | Height and weight based on CDC standards of measurement. Age and gender adjusted. | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. An additional two participants from the PID Algorithm group and an additional three participants from the PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm group were not included in this outcome due to missing data. Separate BMI outcomes were reported for participants age ≥18 years and age <18 years due to differing units of measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | BMI percentile | Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); randomization (Week 2 through 8, depending); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Key Safety Outcome 1) Percentage of Time Sensor Glucose Readings Were <54 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL (3.0 and 3.9 mmol/L, Respectively | Glucose levels based on sensor glucose data | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of time | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Key Safety Outcome 2) Number of DKA Events | DKA as defined by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and described below:
| All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Number | Events | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Key Safety Outcome 3) Number of Severe Hypoglycemia Events | Severe hypoglycemia event as defined by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and described below: The event required assistance of another person due to altered consciousness, and required another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. This means that the participant was impaired cognitively to the point that he/she was unable to treat himself/herself, was unable to verbalize his/ her needs, was incoherent, disoriented, and/or combative, or experienced seizure or loss of consciousness. | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Number | Events | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Amount of Total Insulin at Daytime, Nighttime and Post-meal | Based on sensor glucose data | All 113 participants completed both arms except for two (one in each arm) who dropped out during period 1; both of whom were included in the analysis for the partial period they completed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | insulin units | 12 weeks for each arm of the crossover |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Human Factors and Diabetes Technology Attitude and Human Factors Questionnaires | Surveys completed by participants. The Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey is 15 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The Diabetes Distress Scale is 17 items on a 1-6 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more distress. The Hypoglycemia Confidence Survey is 8 items on a 1-4 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more confidence. The Diabetes Technology Attitudes Survey is 5 items on a 0-4 scale; Total score calculated as sum of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with diabetes technology. The Adult INSPIRE Survey is 22 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with AID. The Adolescent INSPIRE Survey is 17 items on a 1-5 scale; Total score calculated as mean of all item scores; higher score denotes more satisfaction with AID. | One participant in the PID Algorithm group and two participants in the PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm group did not complete the questionnaires. Questionnaire scores were calculated based on the ends of crossover periods 1 and 2. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Time Frame: Screening visit, at initiation (Day 0); end of crossover period 1 (Week 14 through 20, depending); and end of crossover period 2 (Week 26-32, depending) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 112 |
| 2 |
| 112 |
| 5 |
| 112 |
| EG001 | PID + Fuzzy Logic Algorithm | Participants received insulin delivered by the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed loop system (Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL) with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor. Medtronic Minimed 670G 4.0 AHCL with Guardian Sensor (3) continuous glucose monitoring sensor.: The components of the intervention are the insulin pump with insulin delivery algorithm (PID + Fuzzy Logic) and Guardian Sensor (3). | 0 | 112 | 1 | 112 | 5 | 112 |
| Ruptured Appendix | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicidal Tendencies | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
|
| Hyperglycemia or Ketosis Events not Related to Insulin Pump Problem (without diabetic ketoacidosis) | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin reactions | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Skin reactions at infusion site and continuous glucose monitor sensor site |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| Percentage of Sensor Glucose Readings >180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) |
|
| Percentage of Sensor Glucose Readings >250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L) |
|
| Total Insulin Units for Nighttime |
|
| Total Basal Insulin Units for 24 Hours |
|
| Total Basal Insulin Units for Daytime |
|
| Total Basal Insulin Units for Nighttime |
|
| Total Bolus Insulin Units for 24 Hours |
|
| Total Bolus Insulin Units for Daytime |
|
| Total Bolus Insulin Units for Nighttime |
|
| Body Mass Index (Age ≥18 years) End of Period 2 |
|
|
| Body Mass Index Percentile (Age <18 years) End of Period 2 |
|
|
| Nighttime Total Insulin Delivery |
|
| Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey Mean Score - End of Period 2 |
|
|
| Diabetes Distress Scale Total Score - End of Period 1 |
|
|
| Diabetes Distress Scale Total Score - End of Period 2 |
|
|
| Hypoglycemia Confidence Survey Mean Score - End of Period 1 |
|
|
| Hypoglycemia Confidence Survey Mean Score - End of Period 2 |
|
|
| Diabetes Technology Attitudes Survey - End of Period 1 |
|
|
| Diabetes Technology Attitudes Survey - End of Period 2 |
|
|
| INSPIRE Survey Adult Version Total Score - End of Period 1 |
|
|
| INSPIRE Survey Adult Version Total Score - End of Period 2 |
|
|
| INSPIRE Survey Adolescent Version Total Score - End of Period 1 |
|
|
| INSPIRE Survey Adolescent Version Total Score - End of Period 2 |
|
|