Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Novo Nordisk A/S | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A two year, parallel, two group, open-label, real-world randomised controlled trial (RCT) design for subjects with severe and complex obesity who are referred to a Tier 3 or equivalent specialist weight management/obesity service. Participants will be randomised to receive 1) standard care (obesity-specialist care), or 2) targeted prescribing pathway (obesity-specialist care plus targeted use of Liraglutide 3.0mg [LIRA 3mg] with pre-specified stopping rules for the medication). The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness, budget impact, and cost-effectiveness between the two groups in a real-world setting among otherwise largely unselected patients.
Summary of Trial Design A two year, parallel, two group, open-label, real-world, RCT design for patients with severe and complex obesity who are referred to a Tier 3 obesity service (including patients who are referred to a Tier 3 service as part of the bariatric surgery pathway). The total duration of participation will be 104 weeks (+/-2 weeks).
The first 52 weeks of the study (after randomisation) will determine whether using the targeted prescribing pathway in a Tier 3 setting will result in more participants attaining ≥15% weight loss compared with standard care. The second 52 weeks of the study will assess whether patients who lose ≥15% of their baseline weight by the first 52 weeks are more likely to maintain ≥15% weight loss for another 52 weeks in the targeted prescribing pathway compared with standard care. Further, budget impact, cost-effectiveness, improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities, complementary aspects of safety, effectiveness, adherence, and treatment satisfaction of both treatment groups will be assessed and compared.
Participants will be randomised in a 2:1 fashion to either the intervention (targeted prescribing pathway + standard care) or control (standard care) group (2 intervention: 1 control). The control group will receive standard care in a specialist obesity service (Tier 3 or equivalent), according to the best practice in each site and can include total or partial meal replacement strategies. The intervention group will receive the same standard care as the control group (i.e. according to the best practice in each site) plus all participants will initially receive LIRA with pre-specified stopping rules. The targeted prescribing pathway: participants who do not meet the definition of a 'early and good responder' (defined as achieving ≥5% weight loss at 16 weeks, ≥10% weight loss at 32 weeks and ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks) will have their LIRA 3mg treatment stopped. It is important to note that all participants will be analysed in the group to which they are randomised; in particular, participants in the intervention group who stop receiving LIRA 3mg will remain in the intervention group and will continue to receive standard care for the remainder of the study as per the targeted prescribing pathway (albeit, the part of the pathway where LIRA 3mg is not prescribed; see Figure 1).
The study is intentionally designed to reflect a pragmatic "real-world" scenario and each Tier 3 provider may require a different number of visits for their programme. However, study appointments for data collection, titration reviews, application of the stopping rules of LIRA 3mg, and dispensing will be standardised for all of the five sites.
Intervention (Targeted Prescribing Pathway)
The NHS Weight Management pathway is divided into four distinct tiers:
Tier 1: health promotion Tier 2: lifestyle interventions Tier 3: specialist multidisciplinary weight management services Tier 4: bariatric surgery
Across the UK, each region has a specialist Tier 3 obesity and/or weight management service or equivalent, usually referred to as Tier 3. This includes a clinician led multidisciplinary team approach, potentially including a specialist physician, nurse, dietician, psychologist, physiotherapist, etc. From this point forwards, Tier 3 specialist weight management and/or equivalent services will be referred to as 'Tier 3' throughout the remainder of this protocol.
Participants in the intervention group will receive the same standard care as those in the control group, i.e. the best medical practice delivered by the Tier 3 service at each site. Additionally, at baseline, LIRA 3mg will be prescribed to all of the participants in the intervention group at a starting dose of 0.6mg daily. Dose escalation of Liraglutide will occur according to a pre-specified titration protocol, from 0.6mg to a maximum of 3.0mg daily. Liraglutide dose will be initiated at 0.6mg and then increased to 1.2mg in Week 2, 1.8mg in Week 3, 2.4mg in Week 4, and 3.0mg in Week 5. Participants in the intervention group will be aware that the LIRA 3mg treatment may be stopped at various time points throughout the duration of the study and that continued use of LIRA 3mg is based upon their response to the treatment in terms of them achieving pre-defined weight loss targets at 16, 32 and 52 weeks.. Specifically, participants in the intervention group will continue to be prescribed LIRA 3mg for the 104 week duration of the study, unless one of the following stopping rules applies:
Participants who fail to reach the pre-defined weight-loss targets to continue LIRA 3mg treatment, or who choose to stop receiving LIRA 3mg, will continue to be offered the standard care provided by the Tier 3 service. These participants will still attend the Clinical Review Visits but not the additional visits for participants who are still on LIRA 3mg (e.g. Weeks 65 & 91) because these visits will not be relevant to them; visits at Weeks 65 and 91 are intended to provide a new prescription of LIRA 3mg and to discuss adherence and any side effects;; see Appendices 2 & 3).
Participants will remain routinely in the Tier 3 service in-line with NICE guidance throughout the duration of the research study. Participants may be offered treatment options within the duration of the study, including bariatric surgery, as per NICE guidance and according to the decision of the local Tier 3 Multidisciplinary Team. Participants who have undergone bariatric surgery after randomisation will only be included in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. This decision was made because the proportion of participants undergoing bariatric surgery is likely to be unbalanced between the treatment groups (i.e. more participants in the control group are expected to have bariatric surgery than in the targeted prescribing pathway treatment group), and thus weight loss in these individuals could unduly influence the study results. Participants who have been prescribed and start anti-obesity medication (such as Orlistat) will be ineligible for LIRA 3mg treatment.
Control (Standard Care) Participants in the control group will follow the best medical care provided by the Tier 3 service at the relevant site. This typically involves dietary advice to reduce energy intake (and may include a period of partial or total meal replacement), accompanied - if available - by a physical activity programme, both supported by behavioural change techniques with regular professional contacts. The nature of the standard care will vary between the different Tier 3 services at each site, as this is a pragmatic 'real-world' study. Clinician input will include the medical assessment of participants for severe and complicated obesity and the prescription of anti-obesity drugs (such as Orlistat) as per local Tier 3 service policy. As with the LIRA 3mg group those patients taking antihypertensive or antidepressant medication will be assessed and it will be at the clinician's discretion as to whether these medications are changed. Participants will remain routinely in the Tier 3 service in-line with NICE guidance throughout the duration of the research study. Participants may be offered treatment options within the duration of the study, including bariatric surgery, as per NICE guidance and according to the decision of the local Tier 3 Multidisciplinary Team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targeted Prescribing Pathway (LIRA 3mg + Standard Care) | Experimental | Standard care plus targeted use of the intervention Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply |
|
| Standard Care | Active Comparator | standard Tier 3 obesity specialist service care |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saxenda | Drug | standard care plus targeted use of Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply. Liraglutide (Saxenda) 6 mg/mL solution for injection in pre-filled pen, administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose escalation to 3.0 mg daily (or maximum tolerated dose) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Intention to Treat) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol Without Excluded Concomitant Medications) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | 52 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat) | Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 52 weeks | 52 weeks |
| Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
be aged between 18-75 years old (inclusive)
understand written and spoken English
be able to give in informed consent
a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2,
have been referred to Tier 3 weight management or equivalent service in one of the five participating sites,
have a stable body weight (less than 5kg self-reported change during the previous 12 weeks),
Participant must be able to meet at least one of the inclusion criteria listed below:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melanie Davies, Prof | Univesrity of Leicester | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Vincent's University Hospital | Dublin | Ireland | ||||
| NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38803628 | Derived | Papamargaritis D, Al-Najim W, Lim JZM, Crane J, Bodicoat DH, Barber S, Lean M, McGowan B, O'Shea D, Webb DR, Wilding JPH, le Roux CW, Davies MJ. Effectiveness of integrating a pragmatic pathway for prescribing liraglutide 3.0 mg in weight management services (STRIVE study): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 9;39:100853. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100853. eCollection 2024 Apr. | |
| 32060156 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Liraglutide Arm - Targeted Prescribing Pathway (LIRA 3mg + Standard Care) | Saxenda: standard care plus targeted use of Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply. Liraglutide (Saxenda) 6 mg/mL solution for injection in pre-filled pen, administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose escalation to 3.0 mg daily (or maximum tolerated dose). Plus specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
| FG001 | Standard Care Arm | Specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Liraglutide Arm - Targeted Prescribing Pathway (LIRA 3mg + Standard Care) | Saxenda: standard care plus targeted use of Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply. Liraglutide (Saxenda) 6 mg/mL solution for injection in pre-filled pen, administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose escalation to 3.0 mg daily (or maximum tolerated dose). Plus specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
Adverse events were recorded throughout the study (BL-Wk104) whether serious or not. Members of research team asked participants about AEs at each study visit and recorded these on AE/SAE logs and reported SAEs as per sponsor and regulatory requirements.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Liraglutide Arm - Targeted Prescribing Pathway (LIRA 3mg + Standard Care) | Saxenda: standard care plus targeted use of Liraglutide (LIRA) 3mg when pre-specified stopping rules for the medication apply. Liraglutide (Saxenda) 6 mg/mL solution for injection in pre-filled pen, administered by subcutaneous injection. Dose escalation to 3.0 mg daily (or maximum tolerated dose). Plus specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Although the trial was not interrupted during COVID-19 we did issue an USM to the REC & MHRA during the pandemic to explain that certain aspects of the trial would not be possible, however measures were put in place to ensure participant safety.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof Melanie Davies | University of Leicester | 0116 258 6481 | melanie.davies@uhl-tr.nhs.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 29, 2021 | Jan 17, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 3, 2022 | Jan 17, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009765 | Obesity |
| D015431 | Weight Loss |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069450 | Liraglutide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D052216 | Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 |
| D004763 | Glucagon-Like Peptides |
| D052336 | Proglucagon |
| D005768 | Gastrointestinal Hormones |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Specialist Obesity Management Services | Other | Specialist Obesity Management Services standard of care |
|
Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 104 weeks
| 104 weeks |
| Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 52 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response. | 52 weeks |
| Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 104 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response. | 104 weeks |
| Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 52 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study. | 52 weeks |
| Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 104 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study. | 104 weeks |
| Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | 16 weeks |
| Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | 32 weeks |
| Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 52 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | 52 weeks |
| Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 16 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 16 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 32 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 32 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 52 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 104 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Referral to Other Obesity Interventions (Intention to Treat) | Number of participants referred to Tier 4 for bariatric surgery over the 104 weeks study period | 104 weeks |
| Referral to Other Obesity Interventions by Site (Intention to Treat) | Referrals for bariatric surgery by 104 weeks, stratified by study site. | 104 weeks |
| Bariatric Surgery Completion (Intention to Treat) | Number of participants who underwent bariatric surgery by 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants maintaining weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks | 104 weeks |
| Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | 16 weeks |
| Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | 32 weeks |
| Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 16 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 32 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases) | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | 52 weeks |
| Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases) | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | 104 weeks |
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases) | Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | 52 weeks |
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases) | Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | 104 weeks |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases) | Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | 52 weeks |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases) | Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | 104 weeks |
| Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases) | Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | 52 weeks |
| Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases) | Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | 104 weeks |
| Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases) | Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status. | 52 weeks |
| Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases) | Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status. | 104 weeks |
| HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | 52 weeks |
| HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | 104 weeks |
| HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | 52 weeks |
| HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | 104 weeks |
| Hypertension (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with hypertension at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Hypertension (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with hypertension at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks. | 16 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks. | 32 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 52 weeks. | 52 weeks |
| Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants who maintained weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks. | 104 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 16 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 32 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | 52 weeks |
| Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | 104 weeks |
| Glasgow |
| United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital Aintree | Liverpool | United Kingdom |
| Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Papamargaritis D, Al-Najim W, Lim J, Crane J, Lean M, le Roux C, McGowan B, O'Shea D, Webb D, Wilding J, Davies MJ. Effectiveness and cost of integrating a pragmatic pathway for prescribing liraglutide 3.0 mg in obesity services (STRIVE study): study protocol of an open-label, real-world, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034137. |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Death |
|
| Tolerance |
|
| Unknown/no reason given |
|
| BG001 | Standard Care Arm | Specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kg |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kg/m2 |
|
| Heart Rate | Mean | Standard Deviation | Beats/minute |
|
| Waist Circumference | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimetre |
|
| HbA1c mmol/mol | Mean | Standard Deviation | Mmol/mol |
|
| HbA1c % | Mean | Standard Deviation | % |
|
| Systolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
|
| Diastolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
|
| LDL Cholesterol | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
|
| HDL Cholesterol | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
|
| Total Cholesterol | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
|
| Triglycerides | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
|
| Average total MET | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minutes/week |
|
| Smoking status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Glycaemic Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hypertension Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sleep Apnoea Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Number of all Medications | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Number of Diabetes Medications | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Number of Antihypertensive Medications | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Statin Use | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Standard Care Arm | Specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care |
|
|
|
| Primary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Intention to Treat) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | Per protocol population All participants who were compliant with their randomised treatment, analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised. Standard care group are compliant if they complete >70% of the planned contacts in the T3 service. The intervention group are compliant if they complete >70% of the planned contacts in the T3 service, and take >70% of their prescribed LIRA 3mg. Excludes participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Per Protocol Without Excluded Concomitant Medications) | Proportion of participants with severe and complicated obesity achieving weight loss of ≥15% at 52 weeks with the use of a targeted prescribing pathway (i.e. use of LIRA 3mg according to a pre-specified protocol in combination with standard care provided in Tier 3 services) versus standard care alone in a Tier 3 service. | Per protocol population. All participants who were compliant with their randomised treatment, analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised. Standard care group are compliant if they complete >70% of the planned contacts in the T3 service. The intervention group are compliant if they complete >70% of the planned contacts in the T3 service, and take >70% of their prescribed LIRA 3mg. Excludes participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat) | Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 52 weeks | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participant Attendance at Appointments (Intention to Treat) | Attended at least 70% of scheduled Tier 3 appointments by 104 weeks | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 52 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cessation of Treatment Due to Adverse Effects (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg by 104 weeks because of adverse effects (i.e., the main reason for stopping was listed as 'adverse event' or 'unable to tolerate drug'). This number does not include people who stopped treatment due to a stopping rule or reason other than an adverse effect. Only defined for participants who were currently eligible for liraglutide 3mg treatment. Participants may have stopped treatment due to adverse effects at an earlier timepoint and so the total number of 'yes' and 'no' responses is higher than the number eligible for liraglutide 3mg at the analysis time-point, i.e. if a participant stopped at week 16 due to adverse events then they would still be included in the 'yes' response. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 52 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participant Compliance With Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant was compliant with liraglutide 3mg treatment up to 104 weeks. This was defined using the questionnaire answers as detailed in Appendix 7 of the SAP, and so includes all participants (i.e., not only those who attended the visit) up to the point when they stopped treatment or withdrew from the study. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. Only includes participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Stopping of Treatment (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant had stopped treatment with liraglutide 3mg at 52 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason, such as an adverse event despite passing the stopping rule). Only defined for participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. Only includes participants who were on liraglutide 3mg treatment at the previous time-point. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 16 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 16 weeks. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Completion of Tier 3 Despite Liraglutide Cessation by 32 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant completed 52 weeks of the Tier 3 service programme despite stopping liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks (due to stopping rules or other reason). Only defined for participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 32 weeks. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. Only includes participants who stopped liraglutide 3mg treatment at 32 weeks. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 52 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 52 weeks. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Started on Anti-obesity Drugs at 104 Weeks (Intention to Treat) | Derived binary indicator showing whether participant started on anti-obesity drugs other than liraglutide (defined as a concomitant medication listing of Orlistat) at 104 weeks. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Referral to Other Obesity Interventions (Intention to Treat) | Number of participants referred to Tier 4 for bariatric surgery over the 104 weeks study period | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Referral to Other Obesity Interventions by Site (Intention to Treat) | Referrals for bariatric surgery by 104 weeks, stratified by study site. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were included in this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bariatric Surgery Completion (Intention to Treat) | Number of participants who underwent bariatric surgery by 104 weeks. | Intention to Treat population (ITT). The ITT population was all randomised participants and they were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Missing outcome data were imputed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 16 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 32 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 52 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline, at 104 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 16 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 32 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 52 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline, at 104 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants maintaining weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in weight (kg) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Complete Cases) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute BMI Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimetres | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Complete Cases) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimetres | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases) | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) Score (Complete Cases) | Kings College Obesity Staging (KCOS) score; range 0 to 3. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases) | Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Complete Cases) | Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; range 0 to 27. A higher value corresponds with higher complications and worse outcomes. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases) | Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Complete Cases) | Epworth sleepiness scale, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 24. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases) | Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stop Bang Questionnaire (Complete Cases) | Stop Bang questionnaire, used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea; scale 0 to 8. A higher value corresponds with a worse outcome. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases) | Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Glycaemic Status (Complete Cases) | Glycaemic status, as determined by plasma glucose concentration. The glycaemic status definition states that a participant cannot be categorised as 'diabetes remission' if they are currently using liraglutide 3mg, which means that the absence of diabetes remission cases at follow-up in the intervention group is partly by definition of glycaemic status. | Complete cases population The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period will be excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HbA1c ≤7% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤7% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 52 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HbA1c ≤6.5% for Those With Diabetes at Baseline (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants HbA1c ≤6.5% at 104 weeks, among those with diabetes at baseline. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hypertension (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with hypertension at 52 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hypertension (Complete Cases) | Proportion of participants with hypertension at 104 weeks. | Complete cases. The complete cases population is defined as all randomised participants who have data available for the outcome being analysed, according to the study group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 16 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 32 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 52 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥5% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥5% from baseline at 104 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 16 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 32 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 52 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥10% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥10% from baseline at 104 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 16 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 32 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 52 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weight Loss of ≥15% From Baseline (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants reaching weight loss of ≥15% from baseline at 104 weeks. | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maintenance of ≥15% Weight Loss Until 104 Weeks (Responder Population) | Proportion of participants who maintained weight loss of ≥15% among those who lost ≥15% at 52 weeks. | Complete cases. All individuals in both arms (intervention and control group) who have data available for the outcome being analysed (proportion of participants who maintained at 104 weeks weight loss of >=15% among those who lost >=15% weight loss at 52 weeks) according to the study group to which they were randomised. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 16 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 32 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage Weight Change (Responder Population) | Percentage change in weight from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute BMI Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in BMI (kg/m2) from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimetres | 52 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Waist Circumference Change (Responder Population) | Absolute change in waist circumference (cm) from baseline | Responder population The Responder population is defined as all participants in the intervention group who achieved ≥15% weight loss at 52 weeks, and all participants in the standard care group. Participants were analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised at baseline. Participants who had bariatric surgery during the study period were excluded from this population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimetres | 104 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 260 |
| 43 |
| 260 |
| 238 |
| 260 |
| EG001 | Standard Care Arm | Specialist Obesity Management Services: Specialist Obesity Management Services (Tier 3) - standard of care | 0 | 132 | 16 | 132 | 89 | 132 |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bile duct infections and inflammations | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hernia Repair | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Conduction disorder | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Febrile infection | General disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient cerebrovascular event | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vulvovaginal disorder | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Posterior pituitary disorder | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal lithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Auscultation | Investigations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arrhythmia supraventricular | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal vascular occlusion and infarction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hernia | General disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Female reproductive tract disorder | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Soft tissue infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Soft tissue disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary thrombosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nail operation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Therapeutic procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthenic conditions | General disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal hypomotility | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neurological symptom | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (2.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001835 |
| Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001836 | Body Weight Changes |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006728 |
| Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| Did not attend week 52 visit |
|
| Attended week 52 visit but variable missing |
|
| Did not attend week 104 visit |
|
| Attended week 104 visit but variable missing |
|
| N/A |
|
| Missing |
|
| N/A |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| N/A (still using Liraglutide 3mg at 16 weeks) |
|
| Missing |
|
| N/A (still using Liraglutide 3mg at 32 weeks) |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| Leicester |
|
| Liverpool |
|
| London |
|
| Not referred / missing |
|
| Missing |
|
| At risk of disease at baseline |
|
| At risk of disease at follow-up |
|
| Established disease at baseline |
|
| Established disease at follow-up |
|
| Advanced disease at baseline |
|
| Advanced disease at follow-up |
|
| At risk of disease at baseline |
|
| At risk of disease at follow-up |
|
| Established disease at baseline |
|
| Established disease at follow-up |
|
| Advanced disease at baseline |
|
| Advanced disease at follow-up |
|
| Mild depression at baseline |
|
| Mild depression at follow-up |
|
| Moderate depression at baseline |
|
| Moderate depression at follow-up |
|
| Moderately severe depression at baseline |
|
| Moderately severe depression at follow-up |
|
| Severe depression at baseline |
|
| Severe depression at follow-up |
|
| Mild depression at baseline |
|
| Mild depression at follow-up |
|
| Moderate depression at baseline |
|
| Moderate depression at follow-up |
|
| Moderately severe depression at baseline |
|
| Moderately severe depression at follow-up |
|
| Severe depression at baseline |
|
| Severe depression at follow-up |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Likely obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Likely obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Possible obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Likely obstructive sleep apnoea at baseline |
|
| Likely obstructive sleep apnoea at follow-up |
|
| Prediabetes at baseline |
|
| Prediabetes at follow-up |
|
| Diabetes remission at baseline |
|
| Diabetes remission at follow-up |
|
| Diabetes at baseline |
|
| Diabetes at follow-up |
|
| Prediabetes at baseline |
|
| Prediabetes at follow-up |
|
| Diabetes remission at baseline |
|
| Diabetes remission at follow-up |
|
| Diabetes at baseline |
|
| Diabetes at follow-up |
|
| Hypertension at follow-up |
|
| Hypertension at follow-up |
|