Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Investigator has moved to another institution
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We aim to test the efficacy of a new method for determining individual insulin sensitivity (IS) based on sensor-augmented-insulin pump (SAP) data in order to customize the insulin to carbohydrate ratio (CR) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
To date, the individual insulin sensitivity (IS) could only be investigated by intensive and invasive research techniques that are not feasible to perform in an outpatient setting for pediatric patients with diabetes.
Recently published studies have demonstrated the efficacy of an algorithm to calculate the patient specific insulin sensitivity to customize the CR for adult patients with T1D. The algorithm has been validated in adult patients, however not yet investigated in the pediatric population with T1D.
The aims of our study are:
This approach would have at least two potential benefits for pediatric patients with T1D:
A new method to assess insulin sensitivity (IS) has been proposed and investigated by the PI and his group at the University of Padova. The new insulin sensitivity index, named "SISP" is calculated from data derived from insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) uploads. The efficiency of the SISP has been tested in-silico using the University of Virginia/Padova T1D simulator by mimicking a single-meal scenario with patient-specific optimized carbohydrate ratio (CR) (increased or decreased by 20%) and optimal CR. In all the simulations the use of the optimal CR, calculated with the proposed method, has improved the overall glycemic control. The simulator (S2013) used for this purpose has been valdated and is approved by the FDA as a substitute for preclinical trials for insulin treatments, including closed-loop algorithms. It is comprised of data from 100 in-silico patients that represent the biological variability of a generic real diabetic population. Thus, an algorithm that is tuned on the basis of in-silico analysis can be safely implemented in real-life setting.
The method to estimate SISP and to optimize the CR from SAP data, could be easily applied to the daily management of patients with T1D and in a closed-loop context since several closed-loop algorithms, currently used in clinical trials, are based on the pre-programmed open-loop insulin therapy.
Once the individualized SISP is calculated, it can be used to customize the CR using the in-silico tested algorithm to determine an individualized CR (CRIND).
Consequently, the CRIND can be tested in outpatient setting safely, and adjusted in a run-to-run framework, using a well described approach of self-learning, the latter allowing titration of the insulin therapy based on CGM data using a self-learning algorithm as previously described.
Subjects will be randomly assigned to two different pre-meal insulin CR groups in a 1:1 ratio to determine parameters that will be used to adjust the IS algorithm for pediatric patients with T1D. The post-prandial blood glucose pattern after a pre-meal bolus of CR, CR 20% increased, CR 20% decreased are validated parameters necessary to customize the algorithm for a specific patient population with T1D, therefore subjects will be challenged with two different CRs, depending on the randomization, to collect sufficient data to fine tune the algorithm.
Each subject will go through three meal studies;
Group 1. Meal 1: CR with 20% increase; Meal 2: CR home; Meal 3: CR individualized Group 2. Meal 1: CR with 20% decrease; Meal 2: CR home; Meal 3:CR individualized
Subjects will use the SAP tuned according to the individualized ISR2R and CRR2R obtained from the run-in period, along with an individualized insulin basal rate (BasalR2R). During the run-to-run period subjects will receive weekly revised parameters based on run-to-run algorithm according to data analysis of the past seven days. It will last 3 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All participants | Experimental | +Pediatric patients with T1D. All comparisons will be made within group pre and post intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| individualized insulin sensitivity index (ISind) | Other | The new insulin sensitivity index, named "SISP" is calculated from data derived from insulin pump and glucose monitoring (CGM) uploads. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| overall time in target (70-180mg/dl) | the percentage of time in target will be calculated "(time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100. | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| median percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl) during control period | the percentage of time in target will be calculated "(time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100. | 4 weeks |
| median percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl) post meal 1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eda Cengiz, MD | Yale University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale Pediatric Diabetes Research Program | New Haven | Connecticut | 06511 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
time in target/180 mins * 100 |
| 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl) post meal 2 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl) post meal 3 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl) during Intervention phase | the percentage of time in target will be calculated "(time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100. | 4 weeks |
| overall time in target (70-180mg/dl) after meal 1 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| overall time in target (70-180mg/dl) after meal 2 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| overall time in target (70-180mg/dl) after meal 3 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| overall time in target (70-180mg/dl) during Intervention phase | the percentage of time in target will be calculated "(time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100. | 4 weeks |
| median percentage of time in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl) during Control Phase | time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100 | 4 weeks |
| median percentage of time in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl) after meal 1 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl) after meal 2 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl)after meal 3 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl) during intervention phase | time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100 | 4 weeks |
| median percentage of time below 50mg/dl during control phase | time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100 | 4 weeks |
| median percentage of time below 50mg/dl after meal 1 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time below 50mg/dl after meal 2 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time below 50mg/dl after meal 3 | time in target/180 mins * 100 | 180 minutes post meal |
| median percentage of time below 50mg/dl during intervention phase | time in target/total time of records using continuous glucose monitoring)*100 | 4 weeks |
| severe hypoglycemic events during control phase | They will be measured as number of events per person during the weeks of Control Phase | 4 weeks |
| severe hypoglycemic events after meal 1 | They will be measured as number of events per person after meal 1 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| severe hypoglycemic events after meal 2 | They will be measured as number of events per person after meal 2 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| severe hypoglycemic events after meal 3 | They will be measured as number of events per person after meal 3 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| severe hypoglycemic events during intervention phase | They will be measured as number of events per person during the weeks of Intervention Phase. | 4 weeks |
| active hypoglycemia correction (carbohydrate intake) during control phase | total number of active events per person during the weeks of Control Phase | 4 weeks |
| active hypoglycemia correction (carbohydrate intake) after meal 1 | total number of active events per person after meal 1 all day | up to 24 hours |
| active hypoglycemia correction (carbohydrate intake) after meal 2 | total number of active events per person after meal 2 all day | up to 24 hours |
| active hypoglycemia correction (carbohydrate intake) after meal 3 | total number of active events per person after meal 3 all day | up to 23 hours |
| active hypoglycemia correction (carbohydrate intake) during intervention phase | total number of active events per person during the weeks of Intervention Phase | 4 weeks |
| corrective bolus after meal during control phase | total number of active events per person during the weeks of Control Phase vs Intervention Phase | 4 weeks |
| corrective bolus after meal 1 | total number of active events per person after meal 1 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| corrective bolus after meal after meal 2 | total number of active events per person after meal 2 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| corrective bolus after meal after meal 3 | total number of active events per person after meal 3 for the entire day | up to 24 hours |
| corrective bolus after meal during intervention phase | total number of active events per person during the weeks of Intervention Phase | 4 weeks |