Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of cUTI.
Randomization will be stratified based on two criteria: (1) by primary site of infection (pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy vs all other diagnoses) and (2) by the receipt of a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization. An enrollment cap of approximately 50% is planned for subjects with pyelonephritis with normal urinary tract anatomy. Also, an enrollment cap of approximately 20% is planned for subjects who have received a single dose of non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization.
In this study subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: (i) eravacycline intravenously (IV) / levofloxacin (PO), or (ii) ertapenem (IV) / levofloxacin (PO).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Experimental |
| |
| Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eravacycline | Drug |
|
| |
| Ertapenem |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the EOI Visit | This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate. | End of Infusion |
| Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) Visit | This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate. | TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants in the ITT Population With Favorable Clinical Outcomes at TOC Visit | Clinical cure: A complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection such that no rescue/non-study antibacterial medication was required to treat the cUTI that presented at study entry. Clinical failure: Subjects were classified as clinical failure in the event of
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female participant with either:
Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy (approximately 50% of the total population), or
cUTI with at least one of the following conditions associated with a risk for developing cUTI:
At least 18 years of age at time of consent
Able to provide informed consent
At least two of the following signs or symptoms:
Urine specimen with evidence of pyuria
If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception (for example, condom) during the study and for 14 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: must commit to either use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, spermicidal gel, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 14 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of systemic antibiotics effective in cUTI within 72 hours prior to enrollment except under the following circumstances:
History of an ertapenem-resistant urinary tract infection within 1 year of enrollment
Likely to require >10 days of antibiotic treatment to cure the acute cUTI or likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis prior to the Follow Up visit (21-28 days after randomization) [for example, participants with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux]
Unlikely to survive at least through the duration of the study
Hypotension, systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury [mmHg]
Complicated pyelonephritis with complete obstruction or known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis, or Any condition likely to require surgery to achieve cure (this does not include procedure to place catheters or obtain diagnosis)
Known or suspected urinary fungal infection
Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections
Suspected or confirmed active prostatitis, or currently under treatment for prostatitis
High risk for cUTI due to Pseudomonas (for example, history of prior cUTIs due to Pseudomonas, ≥20 mg once a day prednisone or equivalent steroid, and other risk factors as perceived by the Investigator)
History of renal transplantation
Presence of an ileal loop
Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract occurring within 30 days of screening
Indwelling urinary catheters present at screening which are not expected to be removed or replaced within 72 hours of enrollment (for example, nephrostomy tubes, stents, urethral and suprapubic catheters).
Known concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with CD4 counts below 200 within the last six months, or an acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diagnosis within the last six months
Neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count <1,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]/microliters [µL])
Participation in a study with an experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment
Known or suspected hypersensitivity to tetracyclines, carbapenems, or β-lactams
History of seizures
Any other unstable or clinically significant concurrent medical condition (for example, immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, class IV heart or lung disease, end stage renal disease, or requiring hemodialysis) that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, jeopardize the safety of a participant and/or their compliance with the protocol
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fullerton | California | United States | ||||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Eravacycline 1.5mg/kg IV q24h Placebo IV q24h Levofloxacin (PO) |
| FG001 | Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Ertapenem 1g IV q24h Placebo IV q24h Levofloxacin (PO) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 27, 2016 | Jul 12, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug |
|
| Levofloxacin | Drug |
|
|
| TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization) |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| United States |
| Torrance | California | United States |
| Coral Gables | Florida | United States |
| Doral | Florida | United States |
| Miami | Florida | United States |
| Columbus | Georgia | 31820 | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| Baytown | Texas | United States |
| Graz | Austria |
| Linz | Austria |
| Salzburg | Austria |
| Pleven | Bulgaria |
| Plovdiv | Bulgaria |
| Razgrad | Bulgaria |
| Rousse | Bulgaria |
| Smyadovo | Bulgaria |
| Sofia | Bulgaria |
| Varna | Bulgaria |
| Veliko Tarnovo | Bulgaria |
| Tallinn | Estonia |
| Tartu | Estonia |
| Võru | Estonia |
| K'ut'aisi | Georgia |
| Tbilisi | Georgia |
| Baja | Hungary |
| Budapest | Hungary |
| Miskolc | Hungary |
| Nagykanizsa | Hungary |
| NyÃregyháza | Hungary |
| Sopron | Hungary |
| Szentes | Hungary |
| Tatabánya | Hungary |
| Jelgava | Latvia |
| Riga | Latvia |
| Valmiera | Latvia |
| Chisinau | Moldova |
| Brasov | Romania |
| Bucharest | Romania |
| Craiova | Romania |
| Oradea | Romania |
| Arkhangelsk | Russia |
| Moscow | Russia |
| Pyatigorsk | Russia |
| Rostov-on-the-Don | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Smolensk | Russia |
| Vsevolozhsk | Russia |
| Yaroslavl | Russia |
| Nitra | Slovakia |
| Poprad | Slovakia |
| Prešov | Slovakia |
| SvidnÃk | Slovakia |
| Žilina | Slovakia |
| Chernihiv | Ukraine |
| Chernivtsi | Ukraine |
| Dnipro | Ukraine |
| Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine |
| Kharkiv | Ukraine |
| Kyiv | Ukraine |
| Lviv | Ukraine |
| Mykolaiv | Ukraine |
| Odesa | Ukraine |
| Poltava | Ukraine |
| Uzhhorod | Ukraine |
| Vinnytsia | Ukraine |
| Zaporizhia | Ukraine |
| Zhytomyr | Ukraine |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Eravacycline 1.5 mg/kg IV q24h Placebo IV Levofloxacin PO |
| BG001 | Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral) | Ertapenem 1.0g IV q24h Placebo IV Levofloxacin PO |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the EOI Visit | This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate. | micro-ITT included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 baseline bacterial pathogen from a urine or blood culture that caused a urinary tract infection (UTI) against which eravacycline and ertapenem had expected antibacterial activity. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | End of Infusion |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) Visit | This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate. | micro-ITT included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 baseline bacterial pathogen from a urine or blood culture that caused a urinary tract infection (UTI) against which eravacycline and ertapenem had expected antibacterial activity. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Participants in the ITT Population With Favorable Clinical Outcomes at TOC Visit | Clinical cure: A complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection such that no rescue/non-study antibacterial medication was required to treat the cUTI that presented at study entry. Clinical failure: Subjects were classified as clinical failure in the event of
| ITT included all randomized participants, regardless of receiving study drug or not. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization) |
|
The time frame for adverse event reporting was from the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or the FU visit (whichever was later).
The safety population was all randomized subjects who receive any amount of study drug. All safety analyses were conducted in this population and are presented by treatment actually received (not as randomized). One subject randomized to the ertapenem group received a dose of eravacycline and was included in the eravacycline group in the safety analysis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Eravacycline (Intravenous) | Eravacycline 1.5 mg/kg IV -The safety population was all randomized subjects who receive any amount of study drug. All safety analyses were conducted in this population and are presented by treatment actually received (not as randomized). One subject randomized to the ertapenem group received a dose of eravacycline and was included in the eravacycline group in the safety analysis. | 3 | 601 | 11 | 601 | 174 | 601 |
| EG001 | Ertapenem (Intravenous) | Ertapenem 1 g IV-The safety population was all randomized subjects who receive any amount of study drug. All safety analyses were conducted in this population and are presented by treatment actually received (not as randomized). One subject randomized to the ertapenem group received a dose of eravacycline and was included in the eravacycline group in the safety analysis. | 2 | 600 | 6 | 600 | 52 | 600 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiorenal syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningioma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decubitus ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aneurysm ruptured | Vascular disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Circulatory collapse | Vascular disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion site phlebitis | General disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | General disorders | MedDra Version 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Development Officer | La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company | 617-715-3600 | ljpcregulatory@ljpc.com |
| Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 22, 2018 | Jul 12, 2019 | SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C571179 | eravacycline |
| D000077727 | Ertapenem |
| D064704 | Levofloxacin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015780 | Carbapenems |
| D047090 | beta-Lactams |
| D007769 | Lactams |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D015242 | Ofloxacin |
| D024841 | Fluoroquinolones |
| D042462 | 4-Quinolones |
| D015363 | Quinolones |
| D011804 | Quinolines |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Austria |
|
| Romania |
|
| Hungary |
|
| United States |
|
| Ukraine |
|
| Georgia |
|
| Slovakia |
|
| Bulgaria |
|
| Estonia |
|
| Russia |
|
| Poland |
|
| Moldova |
|
| Indeterminate |
|
| OG001 | Ertapenem | micro-ITT included all participants in the ITT population who had at least 1 baseline bacterial pathogen from a urine or blood culture that caused a urinary tract infection (UTI) against which eravacycline and ertapenem had expected antibacterial activity. |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|