Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The MED-EL EAS Extended Follow-up Study is an extended follow-up of the subjects who were enrolled in the pivotal study to assess long-term safety and device performance.
The study will be conducted as a prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized, multicenter study at the 14 sites. Up to 68 available subjects who were enrolled in the pivotal study will be invited to participate in the extended follow-up. Study subjects will be followed for a minimum of 5 years post-implantation of the device.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study procedures | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System | Device | Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Words Correct As Assessed by CUNY Sentence Test. | Long-term effectiveness of the Electric-Acoustic System will be assessed by speech perception testing in noise with CUNY sentences completed through five years post-implantation. | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Classification of Residual Hearing at 5 Years Post Operatively as a Function of the HEARRING SCALE. | The HEARRING Scale was developed by the HEARRING Research Group, a collaboration of surgeons and audiologists in the hearing implant field who work together to develop consensus statements. The Scale was published in 2013 by Skarzynski et al. as means to classify post-operative residual hearing thresholds. Residual hearing is classified as complete (100-76%), partial (26-75%), minimal (1-25%), or none (0%) according to an equation which takes into account pre-operative thresholds, post-operative thresholds, and the limits of the audiometer. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford Unversity | Palo Alto | California | 94303 | United States | ||
| University of Miami |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24328756 | Background | Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner W, Caversaccio M, de Bodt M, Gavilan J, Godey B, Green K, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Han DM, Kameswaran M, Karltorp E, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Levevre F, Li Y, Manikoth M, Martin J, Mlynski R, Mueller J, O'Driscoll M, Parnes L, Prentiss S, Pulibalathingal S, Raine CH, Rajan G, Rajeswaran R, Rivas JA, Rivas A, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stephan K, Usami S, Yanov Y, Zernotti ME, Zimmermann K, Lorens A, Mertens G. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;(564):3-13. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Study Procedures | Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System: Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Study Procedures | Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System: Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Words Correct As Assessed by CUNY Sentence Test. | Long-term effectiveness of the Electric-Acoustic System will be assessed by speech perception testing in noise with CUNY sentences completed through five years post-implantation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of words correct | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
|
3 Years (Duration of the Study)
Any adverse event reported by a subject over the duration of the study is included here. Subjects were monitored through at least five years post-implantation from the original clinical trial.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Study Procedures | Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Cochlear Implant System: Combination of a cochlear implant and a hearing aid |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss of Residual Hearing | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Racey | MED-EL Corporation | 1-888-633-3524 | research.us@medel.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 5, 2016 | May 22, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
| Percentage of Words Correct as Assessed by CNC Words in Quiet. | Long-term effectiveness of the Electric-Acoustic System will be assessed by speech perception testing in quiet with CNC words completed through five years post-implantation. | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
| Subjective Benefit From EAS Through 5 Years Post Implantation Measured on the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile Hearing Aid Benefit) Questionnaire. | The APHAB Questionnaire measures percentage of listening difficulty on a scale from 100% (very difficult) to 0% (not difficult at all). Results are reported as the average listening difficulty across subjects. | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
| Miami |
| Florida |
| 33136 |
| United States |
| University of Kansas University Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27517 | United States |
| The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Ear Implanted | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Classification of Residual Hearing at 5 Years Post Operatively as a Function of the HEARRING SCALE. | The HEARRING Scale was developed by the HEARRING Research Group, a collaboration of surgeons and audiologists in the hearing implant field who work together to develop consensus statements. The Scale was published in 2013 by Skarzynski et al. as means to classify post-operative residual hearing thresholds. Residual hearing is classified as complete (100-76%), partial (26-75%), minimal (1-25%), or none (0%) according to an equation which takes into account pre-operative thresholds, post-operative thresholds, and the limits of the audiometer. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Words Correct as Assessed by CNC Words in Quiet. | Long-term effectiveness of the Electric-Acoustic System will be assessed by speech perception testing in quiet with CNC words completed through five years post-implantation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of words correct | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjective Benefit From EAS Through 5 Years Post Implantation Measured on the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile Hearing Aid Benefit) Questionnaire. | The APHAB Questionnaire measures percentage of listening difficulty on a scale from 100% (very difficult) to 0% (not difficult at all). Results are reported as the average listening difficulty across subjects. | 46 completed the questionnaire | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of listening difficulty | Five years (60 months) post-implantation for subjects implanted under the original EAS clinical trial |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 50 |
| 8 |
| 50 |
| 0 |
| 50 |
| Internal Device Failure | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| No Hearing Preservation |
|