Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U1111-1183-0451 | Other Identifier | WHO |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab intravenous (IV) dose optimization on mucosal healing compared with the standard vedolizumab IV dosing regimen over a 30 week treatment period in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and high vedolizumab clearance, based on a Week 5 predefined serum vedolizumab concentration threshold less than (<) 50 microgram per milliliter (microg/mL) and who are Week 6 non-responders based on partial Mayo score.
The drug being tested in this study is called Vedolizumab. Vedolizumab will be administered as an IV infusion. It is being tested in this study with new doses. This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of dose optimization of vedolizumab IV, compared with standard dosing of vedolizumab IV, over a 30-week treatment period.
The study will enroll approximately 250 moderately to severely active subjects with UC in order to randomize approximately 100 non-responder subjects with high vedolizumab drug clearance. Subjects will receive induction therapy of vedolizumab IV 300 mg on Day 1 and Week 2 (Lead-in Period). At Week 5, serum vedolizumab concentration will be measured. At Week 6, subjects will be assessed for clinical response based on partial Mayo score.
Results of both Week 5 vedolizumab concentration and Week 6 clinical response will determine the treatment pathway. Those who are non-responders based on partial Mayo score at Week 6 and who are assessed as having high vedolizumab clearance, based on a predefined Week 5 serum vedolizumab concentration threshold (<50 microg/mL) will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups:
All randomized subjects will receive vedolizumab IV either 300 mg or 600 mg every 4 or 8 weeks.
This multi-center trial will be conducted in United States of America and Canada. The overall time to participate in this study is 56 weeks. Subjects will make multiple visits to the clinic, and will be contacted by telephone, 6 months after last dose of study drug for a long term follow-up safety survey.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-in Period: Vedolizumab 300 mg | Experimental | Vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once at Day 1 and at Week 2. Participants who were non-responders based on partial Mayo score at Week 6 and who had high vedolizumab clearance (>0.14 L/day) at Week 5 were eligible for Randomized Treatment Period (RTP). Participants who were responders (Lead-In Failures) entered the 18-week follow-up period and discontinued the study. |
|
| Randomized Treatment Period (RTP): Standard Treatment Arm | Experimental | Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once every 8 weeks (Q8W) at Weeks 6, 14 and 22 as standard treatment plus 18 weeks follow-up. |
|
| RTP: Dose Optimized Arm | Experimental | Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 600 mg, IV infusion at Week 6, followed by Regimen A: vedolizumab 300 mg once in every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter (Weeks 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26) plus 18 weeks follow-up, or Regimen B: vedolizumab 600 mg, IV infusion Q4W (Weeks 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26) plus 18 weeks follow-up based on drug clearance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vedolizumab IV | Drug | Vedolizumab intravenous infusion. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Mucosal Healing at Week 30 | Mucosal healing is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore <=1 point. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Week 30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 30 | Clinical remission is defined as a complete Mayo score of ≤2 points and no individual subscore >1 point at Week 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Has a diagnosis of UC established at least 1 month prior to Screening by clinical and endoscopic evidence and corroborated by a histopathology report.
Has moderately to severely active UC as determined by a complete Mayo score of 6 to 12 with an endoscopic subscore ≥2 within 28 days prior to enrollment.
Has evidence of UC proximal to the rectum (≥15 cm of involved colon) prior to start of vedolizumab IV dosing.
Has been determined to be suitable for vedolizumab IV for routine management of UC by their physician.
Has a family history of colorectal cancer, personal history of increased colorectal cancer risk, age >50 years, or other known risk factor must be up-to-date on colorectal cancer surveillance (may be performed during screening).
Has demonstrated an inadequate response with, lost response to, or intolerance of at least 1 of the following agents: immunomodulators, corticosteroids, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists. Subject who are naive to TNF-α antagonist therapy or who have previously failed TNF-α antagonist therapy (including primary and secondary non-responders or intolerant) may be included.
Week 6 Randomized Treatment Period Inclusion Criteria
Following Lead-in Period, the subject is assessed as having high vedolizumab drug clearance based on a predefined Week 5 serum vedolizumab concentration threshold (<50 microg/mL).
Following Lead-in Period, the subject is a non-responder based on partial Mayo score at Week 6.
Exclusion Criteria:
Has clinical evidence of abdominal abscess or toxic megacolon at the Screening Visit.
Has had an extensive colonic resection, subtotal or total colectomy.
Has had ileostomy, colostomy, or known fixed symptomatic stenosis of the intestine.
Has a diagnosis of Crohn's colitis or indeterminate colitis, ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, diverticular disease associated with colitis, or microscopic colitis.
Has received any of the following for the treatment of underlying disease within 30 days of screening:
Has received any investigational or approved biologic or biosimilar agent within 60 days or 5 half-lives prior to screening (whichever is longer).
Has previously had prior exposure to approved or investigational anti-integrin antibodies (e.g. natalizumab, efalizumab, etrolizumab, AMG-181, anti-MAdCAM-1 antibodies or rituximab).
Has previously received approved or investigational vedolizumab.
The subject currently requires or is anticipated to require surgical intervention for UC during the study.
Has history or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed, or colonic mucosal dysplasia.
Has any evidence of an active infection during Screening (eg, sepsis, cytomegalovirus, or listeriosis).
Has a clinically significant infection (eg, pneumonia, pyelonephritis) within 30 days prior to screening, or ongoing chronic infection.
Has evidence of active C. difficile as evidenced by positive C. difficile toxin or is having treatment for C. difficile infection or other intestinal pathogens during Screening.
Has a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), or chronic HBV (HBV immune subjects (ie, being hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B antibody positive) may, however, be included), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Subjects with documented successful treatment of HCV with sustained virological response (SVR) at 26 weeks can be enrolled.
Has active or latent tuberculosis (TB), as evidenced by the following:
a. A diagnostic TB test performed within 30 days of screening or during the Screening Period that is positive, defined as: i. Positive QuantiFERON test or 2 successive indeterminate QuantiFERON tests, OR ii. A TB skin test reaction ≥ 5 mm OR, b. Chest X-ray within 3 months of screening that is suspicious for pulmonary TB, and a positive or 2 successive indeterminate QuantiFERON tests within 30 days prior to Screening or during the Screening Period.
Has any identified congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, common variable immunodeficiency, HIV infection, organ transplantation).
Has any live vaccination within 30 days prior to Screening or is planning to receive any live vaccination during participation in the study.
Has used a topical (rectal) treatment with (5-ASA) or corticosteroid enemas/suppositories within 2 weeks prior to Screening.
Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to vedolizumab IV or its components.
Has received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or albumin in the last 30 days prior to screening.
Has any unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular disorder, heart failure moderate to severe (New York Class Association III or IV), any pulmonary, hepatic, renal, GI, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would confound the study results or compromise subject safety.
Has had a surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia within 30 days prior to screening or is planning to undergo major surgery during the study period.
Has a history of malignancy, except for the following: adequately-treated non-metastatic basal cell skin cancer; squamous cell skin cancer that has been adequately treated and that has not recurred for at least 1 year prior to Screening; and history of cervical carcinoma in situ that has been adequately treated and that has not recurred for at least 3 years prior to screening. Subjects with remote history of malignancy (eg, >10 years since completion of curative therapy without recurrence) will be considered based on the nature of the malignancy and the therapy received and must be discussed with the sponsor on a case by-case basis prior to Screening.
Has a history of any major neurological disorders, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor, demyelinating, or neurodegenerative disease.
Has a positive progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) subjective symptom checklist during Screening or prior to the administration of the first dose of study drug on Day 1.
Has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse within 1 year prior to the Screening Visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director Clinical Science | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Clinical Therapeutics, LLC | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States | ||
| Arkansas Primary Care Clinic, PA |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37951560 | Derived | Jairath V, Yarur A, Osterman MT, James A, Balma D, Mehrotra S, Yang L, Yajnik V, Qasim Khan RM. ENTERPRET: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vedolizumab Dose Optimization in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Early Nonresponse. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;22(5):1077-1086.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Nov 10. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain more information on the study, click on this link | View source |
Not provided
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/ For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Participants with UC enrolled in Lead-in Period received vedolizumab 300 mg at Day 1 and Week 2. At Week 5, participants were assessed for clearance and at Week 6 for clinical response per partial Mayo Score. The non-responders were randomized to receive optimized treatment (Regimen A or B, dose decided by vedolizumab clearance) or standard vedolizumab treatment. The responders or participants with low vedolizumab clearance received vedolizumab 300 mg at Week 6 plus 18-week follow-up.
Participants with ulcerative colitis (UC) took part in the study at 90 investigative sites in the United States and Canada from 29 March 2017 to 16 October 2020.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lead-in Period: Vedolizumab 300 mg | Vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once at Day 1 and at Week 2. Participants were then assessed to estimate the vedolizumab clearance at Week 5 and response at Week 6. |
| FG001 | Randomized Treatment Period (RTP): Standard Treatment Arm |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-in Period (6 Weeks) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 19, 2018 | Oct 15, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Week 30 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 30 | Clinical response is defined as a reduction in complete Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30% from Baseline (Day 1) with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point, at Week 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Week 30 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 14 | Clinical response is defined as A reduction in partial Mayo score of ≥2 points and ≥25% from Baseline (Day 1) with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. A composite index of 3 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 with total partial Mayo score ranging from 0 to 9 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity). Partial Mayo score is calculated analogously to the complete Mayo score but excludes the sigmoidoscopy subscore. | Week 14 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free Remission | Participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who have discontinued corticosteroids and are in clinical remission. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. Clinical Remission is defined as a complete Mayo score of <=2 points and no individual subscore >1 point at Week 30. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Week 30 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Durable Clinical Response | A clinical response (based on partial Mayo score), which is defined as a reduction in partial Mayo score of ≥2 points and ≥25% from Baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point at Weeks 14 and 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. A composite index of 3 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 with total partial Mayo score ranging from 0 to 9 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity). Partial Mayo score is calculated analogously to the complete Mayo score but excludes the sigmoidoscopy subscore. Percentage of participants with durable clinical response, clinical response achieved at both Weeks 14 and 30 are reported. | Weeks 14 and 30 |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| 72204 |
| United States |
| Care Access Research LLC | San Pablo | California | 94806 | United States |
| Care Access Research, San Pablo | San Pablo | California | 94806 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Fairfield County | Bridgeport | Connecticut | 06066 | United States |
| Gastro Florida | Clearwater | Florida | 33756 | United States |
| Florida Research Network, LLC | Gainesville | Florida | 32605 | United States |
| Wellness Clinical Research, LLC | Hialeah | Florida | 33016 | United States |
| Center for Advanced Gastro | Maitland | Florida | 32751 | United States |
| Center for Interventional Endo | Orlando | Florida | 32803 | United States |
| BRCR Medical Center, Inc. | Pembroke Pines | Florida | 33028 | United States |
| Gastro Florida | Tampa | Florida | 33626 | United States |
| Atlanta Gastroenterology Specialists, PC | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology | Decatur | Georgia | 30033 | United States |
| Grand Teton Research Group, PLLC | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| NorthShore University HealthSystem | Evanston | Illinois | 60201 | United States |
| Aquiant Research | New Albany | Indiana | 47150 | United States |
| Iowa Digestive disease center | Clive | Iowa | 50325 | United States |
| Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center | Topeka | Kansas | 66604 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates LLC | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70809 | United States |
| Louisiana Research Center, LLC | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71105 | United States |
| 4940 Eastern Ave A building | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| Gastro Center of Maryland | Columbia | Maryland | 20721 | United States |
| Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates | Glen Burnie | Maryland | 21061 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Las Vegas Medical Research | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89113 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Charlotte Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28207 | United States |
| Dayton Gastroenterology, Inc | Dayton | Ohio | 45415 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania Health System | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates PA | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
| Midwest Medical Care | Sioux Falls | South Dakota | 57105 | United States |
| Vanderbilt Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37212 | United States |
| Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Dallas | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Ygenics | Decatur | Texas | 76234 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Texas Digestive Disease Consultants | Keller | Texas | 76248 | United States |
| DHAT Research Institute | Richardson | Texas | 75082 | United States |
| Texas Digestive Disease Consultants - Southlake | Southlake | Texas | 76092 | United States |
| BaylorScott&White Research Institute | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| GI Liver Research LLC | Webster | Texas | 77598 | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Northern Virginia, Ltd. | Fairfax | Virginia | 22031 | United States |
| Swedish Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98104 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc. | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53266 | United States |
| PerCuro Clinical Research Ltd. | Victoria | British Colombia | V8V 3M9 | Canada |
| LHSC - University Hospital | London | Ontario | N6A 5A5 | Canada |
| LHSC - Victoria Hospital | London | Ontario | N6A 5W9 | Canada |
| Taunton Surgical Centre | Oshawa | Ontario | L1H 7K4 | Canada |
| Toronto Digestive Disease Associates, Inc. | Vaughan | Ontario | L4L4Y7 | Canada |
Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once every 8 weeks (Q8W) at Weeks 6, 14 and 22 as standard treatment plus 18 weeks follow-up. |
| FG002 | RTP: Dose Optimized Arm | Following Lead-in Period participants received vedolizumab 600 mg, IV infusion at Week 6, followed by Regimen A: vedolizumab 300 mg once in every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter (Weeks 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26) plus 18 weeks follow-up, or Regimen B: vedolizumab 600 mg, IV infusion Q4W (Weeks 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 26) plus 18 weeks follow-up based on drug clearance. |
| COMPLETED | Completed = Participants who were eligible for randomization or randomized in error; Not completed = Participants who were Lead-In Failure. One participant was randomized to Randomized Treatment Period: Standard Treatment Arm, but was not treated and was thus presented in the Lead-in failure vedolizumab arm for the Safety Analysis Set (N=170). |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Randomized Treatment Period (24 Weeks) |
|
|
Safety analysis set Included all participants who were enrolled and received at least one dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lead-in Period: Vedolizumab 300 mg | Vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once at Day 1 and at Week 2 . Participants were then assessed to estimate the vedolizumab clearance at Week 5 and response at Week 6. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | BMI=weight (kg)/[height (m)^2]. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Smoking Classification | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Mucosal Healing at Week 30 | Mucosal healing is defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore <=1 point. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 30 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 30 | Clinical remission is defined as a complete Mayo score of ≤2 points and no individual subscore >1 point at Week 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 30 | Clinical response is defined as a reduction in complete Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30% from Baseline (Day 1) with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point, at Week 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of particpants | Week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 14 | Clinical response is defined as A reduction in partial Mayo score of ≥2 points and ≥25% from Baseline (Day 1) with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. A composite index of 3 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 with total partial Mayo score ranging from 0 to 9 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity). Partial Mayo score is calculated analogously to the complete Mayo score but excludes the sigmoidoscopy subscore. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 14 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-Free Remission | Participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who have discontinued corticosteroids and are in clinical remission. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. Clinical Remission is defined as a complete Mayo score of <=2 points and no individual subscore >1 point at Week 30. It consisted of 4 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on sigmoidoscopy and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. Overall number analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Durable Clinical Response | A clinical response (based on partial Mayo score), which is defined as a reduction in partial Mayo score of ≥2 points and ≥25% from Baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point at Weeks 14 and 30. Mayo score was used in clinical trials to assess UC disease activity. A composite index of 3 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 with total partial Mayo score ranging from 0 to 9 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity). Partial Mayo score is calculated analogously to the complete Mayo score but excludes the sigmoidoscopy subscore. Percentage of participants with durable clinical response, clinical response achieved at both Weeks 14 and 30 are reported. | Full Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication post-randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Weeks 14 and 30 |
|
From the first dose of study drug up to 18 weeks after the last dose (approximately 44 weeks)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Data is reported for Safety Analysis Set, as per the treatment received throughout the study. Data for adverse events for Regimen A and B are reported per dose.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lead-in Period | Vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion once at Day 1 and at Week 2. | 1 | 278 | 12 | 278 | 10 | 278 |
| EG001 | Lead-in Failure Follow-up Period | Following Lead in Period, participants who were responders at Week 6 or had normal-to-low vedolizumab clearance at Week 5 were not eligible for randomization and received vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion at Week 6 plus 18 weeks follow-up. | 0 | 170 | 1 | 170 | 4 | 170 |
| EG002 | RTP: Standard Treatment Arm | Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 300 mg, IV infusion, once at Weeks 6, 14 and 22 [every 8 weeks (Q8W)] as standard treatment plus 18 weeks follow-up. | 0 | 53 | 4 | 53 | 9 | 53 |
| EG003 | RTP: VDZ Dose Optimization: Regimen A | Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 600 mg at Week 6 and 300 mg IV infusion once every 4 weeks up to Week 26 in regimen A plus 18 weeks follow-up. | 0 | 28 | 4 | 28 | 12 | 28 |
| EG004 | RTP: VDZ Dose Optimization: Regimen B | Following Lead-in Period, participants received vedolizumab 600 mg at Week 6 followed by vedolizumab 600 mg once every 4 weeks up to Week 26 in regimen B plus 18 weeks follow-up. | 0 | 27 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 27 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Benign familial haematuria | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| C-reactive protein increased | Investigations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Takeda | +1-877-825-3327 | TrialDisclosures@takeda.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 17, 2021 | Oct 15, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003093 | Colitis, Ulcerative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003092 | Colitis |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C543529 | vedolizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Voluntary Withdrawal |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Reason not Specified |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Participant is an ex-smoker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|