Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to investigate the overall clinical performance of the test daily disposable stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) compared to the stenfilcon A lens (control).
This will be, prospective, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, bilateral, 1 month cross-over, dispensing study comparing the test lens against the stenfilcon A control lens with a study duration of approximately two months.
Each subject will be randomized to wear either the test or control as a matched pair first and subjects will be randomized based on the order in which the subject is enrolled and qualified into the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) | Experimental | Participants were randomized to wear the stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) for 1 month during the cross over study. |
|
| stenfilcon A lens (control) | Active Comparator | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A (control) lens pair for 1 month during the cross over study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) | Device | silicone hydrogel lens |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | Baseline |
| Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | 1 Week |
| Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | 1 Month |
| Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | Baseline |
| Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | 1 week |
| Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | 1 Month |
| Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast logMAR charts for test and control lenses. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. | Baseline |
| Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
Exclusion Criteria:
A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD | Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry. | Principal Investigator |
| Eric Ritchey, OD, PhD, FAAO | University of Houston | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Optical Research Lab (CORL) | Bloomington | Indiana | 47405 | United States | ||
| The Ocular Surface Institute (TOSI) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Test Lens Then Control Lens | Participants were randomized to wear the stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) for 1 month during the cross over study. stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test): contact lens stenfilcon A lens (Control): contact lens |
| FG001 | Control Lens Then Test Lens | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A (control) lens pair for 1 month during the cross over study. stenfilcon A lens (control): contact lens stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test): contact lens |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Second Intervention |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Overall Study | Total Participants |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline |
|
From baseline up to 1 month on each pair of lenses.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Stenfilcon A Lens With Solution Additive (Test) | Participants were randomized to wear the stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test) for 1 month during the cross over study. stenfilcon A lens with solution additive (test): silicone hydrogel lens |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corneal Staining | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myhanh Nguyen, OD, FAAO | CooperVision, Inc. | 925-730-6716 | mnguyen@coopervision.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 31, 2016 | Jun 15, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| stenfilcon A lens (control) | Device | contact lens |
|
| Baseline |
| Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | 1 Week |
| Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | 1 Month |
| Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Baseline |
| Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | 1 Week |
| Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | 1 Month |
| Overall Corneal Staining | Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe. | One Week |
| Overall Corneal Staining | Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe. | One Month |
| Conjunctival Staining | Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent | 1 Week |
| Conjunctival Staining | Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent | 1 Month |
| Bulbar Hyperemia | Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Week |
| Bulbar Hyperemia | Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Month |
| Limbal Hyperemia | Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Week |
| Limbal Hyperemia | Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Month |
| Palpebral Hyperemia | Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Week |
| Palpebral Hyperemia | Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | 1 Month |
| 1 week |
| Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. | 1 Month |
| Handling Satisfaction | Handling satisfaction is assessed for test and control lens. 5 point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, 5- strongly agree | 1 week |
| Handling Satisfaction | Handling satisfaction is assessed for test and control lens. 5 point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, 5- strongly agree | 1 Month |
| Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | Baseline |
| Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | 1 Week |
| Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | 1 Month |
| Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | Baseline |
| Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | 1 week |
| Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | 1 Month |
| Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | Baseline |
| Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | 1 week |
| Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | 1 Month |
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77204 |
| United States |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Ratings on Comfort | Subjects assessed comfort for test and control lens on a scale 0-10, 0=not comfortable 10=comfortable | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Satisfaction | Subjective ratings on vision satisfaction was assessed for test and control lens using a 5- point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4- agree, 5- strongly agree | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast logMAR charts for test and control lenses. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On High Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on high illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | 1 Week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Visual Acuity On Low Illumination High Contrast | Visual acuity is assessed on low illumination high contrast for test and control lens by LogMAR. Visual acuity of logMar of 0.0 is equivalent to 20/20 of Snellen. Each 0.1 addition in logMar is 1 line in Snellen chart. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | LogMAR | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Corneal Staining | Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | One Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Corneal Staining | Overall corneal staining is assessed for test and control lens in a scale of 0-4, 0=No staining,1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=Severe. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | One Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Conjunctival Staining | Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Conjunctival Staining | Conjunctival staining is assessed for test and control lens in 0.50 steps. Scale 0-4, 0=None, 4= Deep confluent | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Bulbar Hyperemia | Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Bulbar Hyperemia | Bulbar hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Limbal Hyperemia | Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Limbal Hyperemia | Limbal hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Palpebral Hyperemia | Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Palpebral Hyperemia | Palpebral hyperemia is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4,0.25 steps. (0=None, 1=Slight injection of conjunctival vessels, 2=Mild injection, 3=Moderate injection, 4=Severe injection) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Fit Acceptance | Overall fit acceptance is assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Handling Satisfaction | Handling satisfaction is assessed for test and control lens. 5 point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, 5- strongly agree | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Handling Satisfaction | Handling satisfaction is assessed for test and control lens. 5 point Likert scale: 1- Strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, 5- strongly agree | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Wettability | Wettability is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-4, 0=Very poor, 4=Excellent | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lens Surface - Deposits | Deposits are assessed for test and control lens. Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=Clean, no deposits, 4=Deposits of 0.5mm or larger or film covering more than 75% of surface. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subjective Ratings on Dryness | Subjective ratings on dryness is assessed for test and control lens on a scale of 0-10, 0=dry, 10=not dry | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 72 |
| 0 |
| 72 |
| 1 |
| 72 |
| EG001 | Stenfilcon A Lens (Control) | Participants were randomized to wear stenfilcon A (control) lens pair for 1 month during the cross over study. stenfilcon A lens (control): contact lens | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | 5 | 72 |
| Subconjuctival Hyperemia | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Epithelial defect | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Neutral |
|
| Agree |
|
| Strongly agree |
|
| Neutral |
|
| Agree |
|
| Strongly agree |
|
| Neutral |
|
| Agree |
|
| Strongly agree |
|
| Grade 2 |
|
| Grade 3 |
|
| Grade 4 |
|
| Grade 2 |
|
| Grade 3 |
|
| Grade 4 |
|
| Neutral |
|
| Agree |
|
| Strongly Agree |
|
| Neutral |
|
| Agree |
|
| Strongly Agree |
|