Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with high perioperative morbidity, with surgical site infection (SSIs) being one of the most common complications. A retrospective study at Hopkins on SSIs in these patients identified the rate of SSIs to be 16.7% and pre-operative bile stent/drain and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of surgical site infection. Patients with these factors having a predicted risk of up to 32%. Another subsequent retrospective study demonstrated that the use of negative pressure wound therapy device was significantly associated with a decrease in the rate of SSIs.
The hypothesis of the investigator(s) for the current study is that placement of Prevena Peel & Place Dressing (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, NPWT) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy who are at high risk of SSIs will result in a significant decrease in their SSI rate.
Although outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy have improved, it remains a procedure with a high perioperative complication rate. Surgical site infection is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. In a retrospective review of all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Johns Hopkins between 9/2011 and 8/2014, a total of 679 patients, 30-day surgical site infection was observed in 16.7%. By univariate analysis, perioperative blood transfusion, operative time greater than 7 hours, preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation, bile stent, absence of a superficial wound vacuum closure device, and vascular resection were associated with surgical site infection (all, p<0.05). On multivariable analysis, pre-operative bile stent/drain and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors of surgical site infection (all, p<0.001). Studies in colorectal patients have found an estimated cost of up to $1400 per patient secondary to prolonged hospitalization, wound care, and wound complications in patients with procedures complicated by a surgical site infection. Furthermore, in another study of 1144 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1995 and 2011 at Johns Hopkins Hospital, post-operative complications delayed time to adjuvant therapy, decreased median survival.
The hypothesis of the investigator(s) is that placement of Prevena Peel & Place Dressing using the standard Acelity vacuum dressing after suture on patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at highest risk of infection will result in a significant decrease in surgical site infection rate. The investigator(s) plan to perform a randomized control trial where the patients who have had pre-operative bile stent/drain placement and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy will undergo closure with Prevena Peel & Place Dressing using the standard Acelity vacuum dressing after suture versus standard closure. The investigator(s) will then follow the participant(s) for 30 days postoperatively to determine surgical site infection and other perioperative complication rate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevena Peel & Place Dressing for wound closure | Experimental | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using Prevena Peel & Place Dressing. |
|
| Standard closure of the wound | Placebo Comparator | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using the standard closure technique. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevena Peel & Place Dressing | Device | Prevena Peel & Place Dressing is a device that can be used for closure of the surgical site. It provides negative pressure to the surgical wound |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Surgical Site Infection | Surgical site infection will be diagnosed and classified based on the World Health Organization definition into superficial Infection (involving only skin and subcutaneous tissue of incision), deep incisional (involving deep tissues) or organ/space (involving organs and spaces other than the incision which was opened or manipulated during operation) | Within 30 days of the operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged Length of Stay, Measured in Days | Length of stay of patient at the hospital from date of surgery | Within 10 days of surgery |
| Rate of Readmission for Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) | Any readmission for surgical site infections (SSIs) related to the surgery within the first 30 days after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew J Weiss, MD | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 212187 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Prevena Peel & Place Dressing for Wound Closure | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using Prevena Peel & Place Dressing. Prevena Peel & Place Dressing: Prevena Peel & Place Dressing is a device that can be used for closure of the surgical site. It provides negative pressure to the surgical wound |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 10, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Closure of the Surgical Incision | Other | This would involve standard closure of the incision site |
|
| Within 30 days of operation |
| 30-d Readmission | Need for 30-day readmission | Within 30 days of surgery |
| FG001 |
| Standard Closure of the Wound |
In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using the standard closure technique. Standard Closure of the Surgical Incision: This would involve standard closure of the incision site |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Prevena Peel & Place Dressing for Wound Closure | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using Prevena Peel & Place Dressing. Prevena Peel & Place Dressing: Prevena Peel & Place Dressing is a device that can be used for closure of the surgical site. It provides negative pressure to the surgical wound |
| BG001 | Standard Closure of the Wound | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using the standard closure technique. Standard Closure of the Surgical Incision: This would involve standard closure of the incision site |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Neoadjuvant therapy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class | The patients were graded according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists risk scoring system. Patients are scores between I and IV based on their operative risk. ASA I: A normal healthy patient. ASA II: A patient with a mild systemic disease. ASA III: A patient with a severe systemic disease that is not life-threatening. ASA IV: A patient with a severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Preincisional prophylactic antibiotic | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Preoperative biliary stenting | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of Surgical Site Infection | Surgical site infection will be diagnosed and classified based on the World Health Organization definition into superficial Infection (involving only skin and subcutaneous tissue of incision), deep incisional (involving deep tissues) or organ/space (involving organs and spaces other than the incision which was opened or manipulated during operation) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 30 days of the operation |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Prolonged Length of Stay, Measured in Days | Length of stay of patient at the hospital from date of surgery | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | days | Within 10 days of surgery |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Readmission for Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) | Any readmission for surgical site infections (SSIs) related to the surgery within the first 30 days after surgery | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 30 days of operation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 30-d Readmission | Need for 30-day readmission | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 30 days of surgery |
|
|
Within 90 days of surgery
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Prevena Peel & Place Dressing for Wound Closure | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using Prevena Peel & Place Dressing. Prevena Peel & Place Dressing: Prevena Peel & Place Dressing is a device that can be used for closure of the surgical site. It provides negative pressure to the surgical wound | 0 | 62 | 0 | 62 | 7 | 62 |
| EG001 | Standard Closure of the Wound | In the participants randomized to this arm the surgical site will be closed using the standard closure technique. Standard Closure of the Surgical Incision: This would involve standard closure of the incision site | 0 | 61 | 0 | 61 | 15 | 61 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pancreatic fistula | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Delayed gastric emptying | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Postoperative delayed gastric emptying |
| |
| Postoperative respiratory complications | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
The study was conducted at a high volume center for pancreatic surgery with a broad experience using Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), and therefore there is a question about the generalizability of the reductions we observed.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Matthew J. Weiss | Johns Hopkins Hospital | 4106143368 | mweiss5@jhmi.edu |
| Jan 2, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013530 | Surgical Wound Infection |
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| D000072836 | Surgical Wound |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014946 | Wound Infection |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| ASA III/IV |
|
|
|
|
|