Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The mechanism responsible for improvement following manual physical therapy techniques is unknown. Previous studies have indicated both biomechanical and neurophysiologic effects which may be responsible for clinical changes observed. Yet, other studies report clinical changes following sham interventions. Through a mixed-methods design, this study aims to gain more understanding of the social and contextual factors that may be related to the improvement often observed following manual therapy techniques.
A convenience sample will be utilized to obtain subjects. Subjects will be given a brief questionnaire to identify possible contraindications for manual therapy treatment techniques and exclude individuals if necessary. Subjects will be randomized into one of eight groups (three variables, each with two conditions including: therapist gender match/mismatch, lab coat worn/not worn, detailed explanation/colloquial conversation about the technique) and participate in neurodynamic testing for the upper quarter via the Upper Limb Provocation Test. Subjects who are determined to be positive for one or more extremities will receive a sham thoracic spine manipulation technique. After application of the technique, previously positive limbs will be retested. Individuals who respond favorably to the sham technique upon reassessment will participate in an exit interview with open-ended questions in attempt to gain more insight into the factors which may have influenced their neurodynamic mobility improvement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender Match, Labcoat, Explanation | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender matched therapist, wearing a labcoat and receive a detailed anatomic explanation of the technique. |
|
| Gender Match, Labcoat, No Explanation | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender matched therapist, wearing a labcoat, and receive a colloquial discussion of the technique. |
|
| Gender Match, No Labcoat, Explanation | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender matched therapist, not wearing a labcoat, and receive a detailed anatomic explanation of the technique. |
|
| Gender Match, No Labcoat, No Explanation | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender matched therapist, not wearing a labcoat, and receive a colloquial discussion of the technique. |
|
| Gender Mis-match, Labcoat, Explanation | Experimental |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal Manual Therapy | Procedure | Supine thoracic spine sham manipulation located between the levels of T4-7; identical procedure as an active treatment intervention but without the delivery of a high velocity low amplitude thrust |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Upper Limb Provocation Test (ULPT) | Subjects will lie on their back with their shoulder slightly off the edge of a treatment table. The investigator will sidebend the subjects neck away from the extremity being tested and gradually move the extremity into the following positions: scapular depression, shoulder 90 deg abduction, shoulder 90 deg external rotation, forearm supination, wrist/finger extension, and elbow extension. The investigator will assess for symptoms at each phase throughout the test. At the onset of symptoms, sensitization maneuvers will be completed to determine if the origin of the symptoms is neurodynamic in nature and not myofascial. | Baseline and Immediately Post Intervention |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sheri A Hale, PT, PhD, ATC | Shenandoah University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shenandoah University | Winchester | Virginia | 22601 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22294849 | Background | Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, George SZ, Robinson ME. Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing? J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):11-9. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000001. | |
| 19027342 | Background | Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 21. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender mis-matched therapist, wearing a labcoat and receive a detailed anatomic explanation of the technique.
|
| Gender Mis-match, Labcoat, No Explan. | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender mis-matched therapist, wearing a labcoat, and receive a colloquial discussion of the technique. |
|
| Gender Mis-match, No Labcoat, Explan. | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender mis-matched therapist, not wearing a labcoat, and receive a detailed anatomic explanation of the technique. |
|
| Gender Mis-match, No Labcoat, No Explan. | Experimental | Subjects will receive Spinal Manual Therapy (sham thoracic spine manipulation) by a gender matched therapist, not wearing a labcoat, and receive a colloquial discussion of the technique. |
|
| 26427530 | Background | O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O'Sullivan PB, O'Sullivan K. What Influences Patient-Therapist Interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):609-22. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150240. Epub 2015 Oct 1. |
| 27133031 | Background | Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 20. |
| 19119402 | Result | Davis DS, Anderson IB, Carson MG, Elkins CL, Stuckey LB. Upper Limb Neural Tension and Seated Slump Tests: The False Positive Rate among Healthy Young Adults without Cervical or Lumbar Symptoms. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(3):136-41. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.3.136. |