Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the treatments in two cohort for COPD patients: one, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) cohort, which have been evaluated and have certain effect; the other, conventional medicine treatments cohort, based on 2015 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).
COPD, with high prevalence, morbidity, mortality and economic burdens, affects millions worldwide. Although many therapies exist and are being developed to relieve symptoms and reduce mortality in COPD, most have only been studied in placebo-controlled efficacy studies in highly selected populations. There are few clinical trials to compare therapeutic alternatives in real world. Furthermore, some randomized controlled trials on comprehensive TCM interventions, especially based on the TCM patterns, have been the certain evidence for showing definite effect for COPD patients. In addition, studies in real world populations of COPD that received different therapies that do have efficacy evidence was found wide variations in care delivery. In short, there is a need for cohort study in COPD.
This is a multi-center, prospective, cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of TCM on COPD patients. The cohort study will enroll approximately 2540 patients that in two cohort, one, TCM cohort, which have been evaluated and have certain effect; the other, conventional medicine treatments cohort, based on 2015 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).Subjects in two cohort will be followed-up 2 years.The primary outcome measure is the frequency of exacerbations. The secondary efficacy measures include mortality rate and all-cause mortality, FEV1, dyspnea (MMRC), exercise capacity( 6MWD), quality of life ( CAT, SF-36 and COPD-PRO), and effectiveness satisfaction with treatment(ESQ-COPD).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCM cohort | Patients continue to receive the routine TCM treatments recommended by 2011 Chinese treatment guidelines of TCM for COPD. | ||
| Conventional medicine cohort | Patients continue to receive the conventional medicine recommended by 2014 GOLD and Chinese treatment guidelines for COPD. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The frequency of exacerbation | Change from Baseline in the frequency of exacerbation at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All cause mortality | The all-cause mortality in 2 years of the follow up phase. | |
| Forced expiratory volume in one second | FEV1 is the amount of air that can be exhaled in one second. | Change from Baseline in the one second (FEV1) at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
COPD patients
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang Xie, Doctor | Contact | +86 371 66248624 | xieyanghn@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jiansheng Li, Doctor | The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Study Chair |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The biological sample bank includes serum samples, plasma samples, sputum samples, urine samples, stool samples.
| Dyspnea | Using Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale to assess a patient's level of dyspnea. The MMRC scale is a simple grading system that scored from 0 (less severe) to 4 (severe). | Change from Baseline in MMRC at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| Minutes Walking Distance Test (6MWD) | Change from Baseline in the 6MWD at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| COPD Assessment Test (CAT) | Using the CAT to evaluate the impact of COPD on a person's life over time. | Change from Baseline in the CAT at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| Effectiveness satisfaction with treatment | Using the effectiveness satisfaction questionnaire of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ESQ-COPD) to evaluate COPD patients' satisfaction with their treatment over time. | Change from Baseline in the ESQ-COPD at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) | Using the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of COPD on a person's life over time. | Change from Baseline in the SF-36 at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| Patient reported outcome for COPD (COPD-PRO) | Using the COPD-PRO to evaluate the impact of COPD on a person's life over time. | Change from Baseline in the COPD-PRO at the months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of the follow up phase. |
| D020969 |
| Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |