Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A new liquid jet aesthesiometer prototype was developed with the aim to measure ocular surface sensitivity by employing a liquid jet.
This study aims to validate this new prototype by means of correlating its measurement with a previously validated air jet aesthesiometer, the non-contact aesthesiometer (NCCA; by Murphy et al. 1996) and by exploring the repeatability of ocular surface sensitivity measurement.
Currently, no aesthesiometer is available that delivers reliable and repeatable measurement of ocular surface sensitivity in a routine clinical setup. The only commercially available Cochet- Bonnet aesthesiometer uses a tactile-mechanical stimulus (the tip of a nylon thread), which can cause a microerosion when applied to the corneal surface. Additional disadvantages represent poor stimulus reproducibility, a limited stimulus bandwidth and the influence of humidity and age on the bending capibility of the nylon thread. For research purposes prototypes of non-contact air aesthesiometers (eg by Murphy et al. and Belmonte et al) are being used.
This study aims to correlate ocular surface sensitivity measurements of a newly developed prototype, the liquid jet aesthesiometer, with the non-contact air jet aesthesiometer by Murphy et al. 1996 and to explore its repeatability of measurement.
In this repeated measures design 60 subjects participate in corneal sensitivity measurements during two appointments with each described aesthesiometer.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| corneal sensitivity measurement | Air jet aesthesiometry and liquid jet aesthesiometry: All patients will receive the same intervention of corneal sensitivity measurement with air jet aesthesiometry and liquid jet aesthesiometry. Thresholds represent the intensity of air / liquid jet that can just be perceived by the patients. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation with air jet aesthesiometry | correlation between corneal sensitivity measurements between liquid jet and air jet aesthesiometry | two measurements / repeated measures within one month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| repeatability of corneal sensitivity measurement with new prototype | repeatability of corneal sensitivity measurement with liquid jet aesthesiometry | two measurements / repeated measures within one month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
30 healthy subjects within age range of 18-30 years 30 healthy subjects within age range of 50-65 years
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Remo Poffa, MSc. | University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8762770 | Background | Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Mar;16(2):101-7. | |
| 13880071 | Background | COCHET P, BONNET R. [Corneal esthesiometry. Performance and practical importance]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1961 Jul-Aug;6:541-50. No abstract available. French. |
Not provided
Not provided
individual participant data will not be made available to other researchers. The statistical analysis of the data overall will be however published, but individual participant data will not be discussed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 9950612 | Background | Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Schmelz M, Gallar J. Measurement of corneal sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stimulation with a CO2 esthesiometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Feb;40(2):513-9. |