Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 2 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 4 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 8 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 12 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from "no urge to cough" (0 mm) on the left to "severe urge to cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from "no urge to cough" (0 mm) on the left to "severe urge to cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from "no urge to cough" (0 mm) on the left to "severe urge to cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

The urge-to-cough VAS was a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their urge to cough over the previous 24 hours (day/awake time and night time combined). The VAS ranged from "no urge to cough" (0 mm) on the left to "severe urge to cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the urge to cough VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).

In the Global Rating of Change scale, subjects indicated if there had been a change in their symptoms (cough frequency and, separately, cough severity) since starting the IMP. Subjects responded with "worse", "about the same" or "better". If subjects indicated a change (either "worse" or "better") they then indicated on a 7 point scale the degree of change ranging from 1 (almost the same, hardly any change) to 7 (a very great deal changed). Subjects documented their Global Rating of Change in cough frequency and cough severity at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).