Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.
PICO
Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Primary outcome Vertical and horizontal bone level Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter Secondary outcome (a) Pocket probing depth Periodontal probe Millimeter Secondary outcome (b) Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| socket shield (A) | Experimental |
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization. |
|
| conventional immediate implant (B) | Active Comparator |
primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| implant placement | Procedure | implant placement |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical and horizontal bone level | 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pocket probing depth | 9 months | |
| Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side | 9 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed G. Khater, Bsc | Contact | +201111717300 | drahmedgamalkhater@gmail.com | |
| Mostafa I. Shindy, lecturer | Contact |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Galal G. Beheiri, professor | senior supervisor | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12956657 | Background | Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x. | |
| 15882225 | Background | Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 12956475 | Background | Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23. |
| 15635945 | Background | Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61. |
| 16907764 | Background | Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x. |
| 18983313 | Background | Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.x. |
| 13793201 | Background | AMLER MH, JOHNSON PL, SALMAN I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Jul;61:32-44. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152. No abstract available. |
| 18713258 | Background | Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Oct;35(10):906-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.x. Epub 2008 Aug 17. |
| 5224784 | Background | Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Jan;17(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. No abstract available. |
| 22211305 | Background | Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x. |
| 15367183 | Background | Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x. |
| 22211307 | Background | Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x. |
| 15635942 | Background | Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25. |
| 19419446 | Background | Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x. |
| 12562374 | Background | Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x. |
| 23631704 | Background | Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hurzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12076. Epub 2013 Apr 30. |
| 24392492 | Background | Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):23-30. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765. |
| 23342355 | Background | Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):e24-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1346. |
| 23720038 | Background | Scheuber S, Bosshardt D, Bragger U, von Arx T. [Implant therapy following trauma of the anterior teeth - a new method for alveolar ridge preservation after post-traumatic ankylosis and external root resorption]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(5):417-39. French, German. |
| 15877745 | Background | Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Unsal B, Cetiner D, Haytac C, Lang NP. New formation of periodontal tissues around titanium implants in a novel dentin chamber model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Jun;16(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01123.x. |
| 19604282 | Background | Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional implant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylosed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):851-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01653.x. |
| 18724850 | Background | Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):173-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x. |
| 18092446 | Background | Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):521-7. |
| 2614633 | Background | Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. J Periodontol. 1989 Dec;60(12):683-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.683. |
| 20712701 | Background | Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x. |
| 24660198 | Background | Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3. |