Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale: Fluid overload is a common complication in children who are admitted to the pediatric intensive care for mechanical ventilation. Acute lung infection is a frequent cause for admission to the PICU and forms an uniform group with a single organ failure. In these critically ill children, fluid overload is associated with adverse outcome. Restricting the volume of fluids already in an early stage of ICU admission may prevent fluid overload during mechanical ventilation and thus improve clinical outcome. However, at the same time fluid restriction may interfere with appropriate energy and macronutrient intake that is needed for recovery.
Objective: The main goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of a restrictive fluid management protocol and investigate its effect on the occurrence of fluid overload in mechanically ventilated children with acute infectious lung disease.
Study design: Single-center prospective randomized feasibility and pilot study in preparation of a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Study population: Mechanically ventilated children with (suspicion of) acute infectious lung disease admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Intervention: Patients receive either liberal (control group) or a restrictive (experimental group) fluid treatment, while ensuring appropriate caloric intake.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcomes are cumulative fluid balance and body weight during the first week of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes (in preparation of the larger multi-center RCT) include: mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and oxygenation indices. To determine the feasibility, in- and exclusion rate, adherence to treatment arms, need for fluid bolus, need for diuretics and hemodynamic indices as well as energy and protein intake are studied.
Both fluid management protocols reflect a variant of current clinical practice, hence will not provide extra burden or risk to patients included in the study. Patients will be randomized to either of the fluid protocol arms on admission to the PICU (at start of mechanical ventilation). Patients included in the restrictive fluid treatment arm might have direct benefit from the study if indeed fluid overload is less common in this group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restrictive fluid treatment | Experimental | Restrictive fluid regimen |
|
| Liberal fluid treatment | Active Comparator | This is seen as current standard clinical treatment, wherein patients will receive a more liberal fluid regimen. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restrictive fluid regimen | Other | In this treatment arm, patients will receive a maximal daily fluid intake of 70% of normal requirements (for a healthy child). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative fluid balance | First week of mechanical ventilation | |
| Body weight | First week of mechanical ventilation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of mechanical ventilation | Through study completion, an average of 1 week | |
| Oxygenation indices | Through study completion, an average of 1 week | |
| Mortality |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In- and exclusion rate | Through study completion, an average of 1 week | |
| Adherence to treatment arms | Through study completion, an average of 1 week | |
| Need for fluid bolus |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job BM van Woensel, Professor | Contact | 0031-20-5665769 | ic.kinderen@amc.nl | |
| Sarah A Ingelse, MD | Contact | 0031-20-5665675 | s.a.ingelse@amc.nl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Medical Center | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31921715 | Derived | Ingelse SA, Geukers VG, Dijsselhof ME, Lemson J, Bem RA, van Woensel JB. Less Is More?-A Feasibility Study of Fluid Strategy in Critically Ill Children With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection. Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 10;7:496. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00496. eCollection 2019. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D004487 | Edema |
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Liberal fluid regimen | Other | This is considered current standard clinical treatment, wherein patients will receive a fluid regimen of >85% of normal fluid recommendations (for a healthy child). |
|
| Up to 90 days after admission |
| Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Need for diuretics | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Need for vasopressors or inotropic drugs | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Energy and protein intake | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Gastrointestinal complaints | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Hemodynamic indices | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| Occurrence of electrolyte imbalances | Through study completion, an average of 1 week |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |